All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[Shusha]

P F Tinmore

Also, when you have a moment, please discuss the Lausanne Peace Treat VI. Convention Concerning the Exchange of Greek and Turkish Populations, as it pertains to CIL of the time and the present discussion.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Link?

Oh please. There is absolutely no right in international law for a person to have a right of return to a State of which they are not a national.

You need to read up.

Link?

And for the love of everything, please don't post that stupid video again.

Indeed, it goes right over your head.

You haven't posted anything. How can it go over my head.

If you think you have some sort of international law prior to 1948 which guarantees the right of return to countries of which the individual is not a national .... by all means, please post it.

False question.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Toddsterpatriot, et al,

The character of an organization is a reflection of its membership. Violent organization is violent because the constituents of the organization have violent characteristics.

Hamas is a creature of conflict. When there is no more conflict there will be no more Hamas.

Islam is a creature of conflict. When there are no more Muslims there will be no more conflict.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians exhibit an extreme lack of conscience in dealing with the Jewish people and a range of actions including murderous activities directed at the Israeli.

◈ If you remove the sociopathic behavior of the Arab Palestinians, the intensity of the conflict will be disipated significantly.

◈ If you remove the persistent antisocial behavior of the Arab Palestinian, the magnitude of the conflict diminishes.

◈ If you remove the lack empathy and the lack of regret for the criminal activity committed by the Arab Palestinians against the Israeli → it will minimize the conflict.​

◈ If you remove the Arab Palestinian hostilities, the purpose of such which is to intimidate the Israeli population, it would marginalize the state and extinguish the condition of conflict.​

I find it odd that the Arab Palestinians are so tied-up in themselves and believe so hard that it is all about them, that they have absolutely no regard for the lives of anyone else (especially the innocent). They have absolutely no understanding of the Customary and International Humanitarian Laws (IHL). The Arab Palestinians have no moral qualms, although they pretend to (some right here in this discussion group). And that is the scary part; they are the great pretenders. And while we, on this side of the great blue pond, may have difficulty seeing it - because they make it appear that something is the case when in fact it is not, the people in the region have no trouble at all because they are up close and on the receiving end of their deception.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

An interrogative (question) can neither be true or false. That is because it is neither an answer or statement of fact.

Interrogatives can is flawed, but this is not an example of one.

If you think you have some sort of international law prior to 1948 which guarantees the right of return to countries of which the individual is not a national .... by all means, please post it.

False question.

(COMMENT)

The interrogative is in the form of a "Request for Information;" or a "Conditional Challenge" (put your money where your mouth is). They are generally know to be in the family of "either/or questions."

SO! Do you have a response? Do you have an applicable International Law prior to 1948 which guarantees the right of return?

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

An interrogative (question) can neither be true or false. That is because it is neither an answer or statement of fact.

Interrogatives can is flawed, but this is not an example of one.

If you think you have some sort of international law prior to 1948 which guarantees the right of return to countries of which the individual is not a national .... by all means, please post it.

False question.

(COMMENT)

The interrogative is in the form of a "Request for Information;" or a "Conditional Challenge" (put your money where your mouth is). They are generally know to be in the family of "either/or questions."

SO! Do you have a response? Do you have an applicable International Law prior to 1948 which guarantees the right of return?

Most Respectfully,
R

Do you still beat your wife?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Toddsterpatriot, et al,

The character of an organization is a reflection of its membership. Violent organization is violent because the constituents of the organization have violent characteristics.

Hamas is a creature of conflict. When there is no more conflict there will be no more Hamas.

Islam is a creature of conflict. When there are no more Muslims there will be no more conflict.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians exhibit an extreme lack of conscience in dealing with the Jewish people and a range of actions including murderous activities directed at the Israeli.

◈ If you remove the sociopathic behavior of the Arab Palestinians, the intensity of the conflict will be disipated significantly.

◈ If you remove the persistent antisocial behavior of the Arab Palestinian, the magnitude of the conflict diminishes.

◈ If you remove the lack empathy and the lack of regret for the criminal activity committed by the Arab Palestinians against the Israeli → it will minimize the conflict.​

◈ If you remove the Arab Palestinian hostilities, the purpose of such which is to intimidate the Israeli population, it would marginalize the state and extinguish the condition of conflict.​

I find it odd that the Arab Palestinians are so tied-up in themselves and believe so hard that it is all about them, that they have absolutely no regard for the lives of anyone else (especially the innocent). They have absolutely no understanding of the Customary and International Humanitarian Laws (IHL). The Arab Palestinians have no moral qualms, although they pretend to (some right here in this discussion group). And that is the scary part; they are the great pretenders. And while we, on this side of the great blue pond, may have difficulty seeing it - because they make it appear that something is the case when in fact it is not, the people in the region have no trouble at all because they are up close and on the receiving end of their deception.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Arab Palestinians exhibit an extreme lack of conscience in dealing with the Jewish people and a range of actions including murderous activities directed at the Israeli.

And for no reason, of course.

Bulldozing Peace

 

[Hollie]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Toddsterpatriot, et al,

The character of an organization is a reflection of its membership. Violent organization is violent because the constituents of the organization have violent characteristics.

Hamas is a creature of conflict. When there is no more conflict there will be no more Hamas.

Islam is a creature of conflict. When there are no more Muslims there will be no more conflict.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians exhibit an extreme lack of conscience in dealing with the Jewish people and a range of actions including murderous activities directed at the Israeli.

◈ If you remove the sociopathic behavior of the Arab Palestinians, the intensity of the conflict will be disipated significantly.

◈ If you remove the persistent antisocial behavior of the Arab Palestinian, the magnitude of the conflict diminishes.

◈ If you remove the lack empathy and the lack of regret for the criminal activity committed by the Arab Palestinians against the Israeli → it will minimize the conflict.​

◈ If you remove the Arab Palestinian hostilities, the purpose of such which is to intimidate the Israeli population, it would marginalize the state and extinguish the condition of conflict.​

I find it odd that the Arab Palestinians are so tied-up in themselves and believe so hard that it is all about them, that they have absolutely no regard for the lives of anyone else (especially the innocent). They have absolutely no understanding of the Customary and International Humanitarian Laws (IHL). The Arab Palestinians have no moral qualms, although they pretend to (some right here in this discussion group). And that is the scary part; they are the great pretenders. And while we, on this side of the great blue pond, may have difficulty seeing it - because they make it appear that something is the case when in fact it is not, the people in the region have no trouble at all because they are up close and on the receiving end of their deception.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Arab Palestinians exhibit an extreme lack of conscience in dealing with the Jewish people and a range of actions including murderous activities directed at the Israeli.

And for no reason, of course.

Bulldozing Peace

Your habit of spamming threads with YouTube videos as a means to deflect has been addressed previously.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Toddsterpatriot, et al,

The character of an organization is a reflection of its membership. Violent organization is violent because the constituents of the organization have violent characteristics.

Hamas is a creature of conflict. When there is no more conflict there will be no more Hamas.

Islam is a creature of conflict. When there are no more Muslims there will be no more conflict.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians exhibit an extreme lack of conscience in dealing with the Jewish people and a range of actions including murderous activities directed at the Israeli.

◈ If you remove the sociopathic behavior of the Arab Palestinians, the intensity of the conflict will be disipated significantly.

◈ If you remove the persistent antisocial behavior of the Arab Palestinian, the magnitude of the conflict diminishes.

◈ If you remove the lack empathy and the lack of regret for the criminal activity committed by the Arab Palestinians against the Israeli → it will minimize the conflict.​

◈ If you remove the Arab Palestinian hostilities, the purpose of such which is to intimidate the Israeli population, it would marginalize the state and extinguish the condition of conflict.​

I find it odd that the Arab Palestinians are so tied-up in themselves and believe so hard that it is all about them, that they have absolutely no regard for the lives of anyone else (especially the innocent). They have absolutely no understanding of the Customary and International Humanitarian Laws (IHL). The Arab Palestinians have no moral qualms, although they pretend to (some right here in this discussion group). And that is the scary part; they are the great pretenders. And while we, on this side of the great blue pond, may have difficulty seeing it - because they make it appear that something is the case when in fact it is not, the people in the region have no trouble at all because they are up close and on the receiving end of their deception.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Arab Palestinians exhibit an extreme lack of conscience in dealing with the Jewish people and a range of actions including murderous activities directed at the Israeli.

And for no reason, of course.

Bulldozing Peace

Your habit of spamming threads with YouTube videos as a means to deflect has been addressed previously.

All relevant, of course.

 

[Hollie]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Toddsterpatriot, et al,

The character of an organization is a reflection of its membership. Violent organization is violent because the constituents of the organization have violent characteristics.

Hamas is a creature of conflict. When there is no more conflict there will be no more Hamas.

Islam is a creature of conflict. When there are no more Muslims there will be no more conflict.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians exhibit an extreme lack of conscience in dealing with the Jewish people and a range of actions including murderous activities directed at the Israeli.

◈ If you remove the sociopathic behavior of the Arab Palestinians, the intensity of the conflict will be disipated significantly.

◈ If you remove the persistent antisocial behavior of the Arab Palestinian, the magnitude of the conflict diminishes.

◈ If you remove the lack empathy and the lack of regret for the criminal activity committed by the Arab Palestinians against the Israeli → it will minimize the conflict.​

◈ If you remove the Arab Palestinian hostilities, the purpose of such which is to intimidate the Israeli population, it would marginalize the state and extinguish the condition of conflict.​

I find it odd that the Arab Palestinians are so tied-up in themselves and believe so hard that it is all about them, that they have absolutely no regard for the lives of anyone else (especially the innocent). They have absolutely no understanding of the Customary and International Humanitarian Laws (IHL). The Arab Palestinians have no moral qualms, although they pretend to (some right here in this discussion group). And that is the scary part; they are the great pretenders. And while we, on this side of the great blue pond, may have difficulty seeing it - because they make it appear that something is the case when in fact it is not, the people in the region have no trouble at all because they are up close and on the receiving end of their deception.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Arab Palestinians exhibit an extreme lack of conscience in dealing with the Jewish people and a range of actions including murderous activities directed at the Israeli.

And for no reason, of course.

Bulldozing Peace

Your habit of spamming threads with YouTube videos as a means to deflect has been addressed previously.

All relevant, of course.

Spamming suggests otherwise.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Toddsterpatriot, et al,

The character of an organization is a reflection of its membership. Violent organization is violent because the constituents of the organization have violent characteristics.

Islam is a creature of conflict. When there are no more Muslims there will be no more conflict.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians exhibit an extreme lack of conscience in dealing with the Jewish people and a range of actions including murderous activities directed at the Israeli.

◈ If you remove the sociopathic behavior of the Arab Palestinians, the intensity of the conflict will be disipated significantly.

◈ If you remove the persistent antisocial behavior of the Arab Palestinian, the magnitude of the conflict diminishes.

◈ If you remove the lack empathy and the lack of regret for the criminal activity committed by the Arab Palestinians against the Israeli → it will minimize the conflict.​

◈ If you remove the Arab Palestinian hostilities, the purpose of such which is to intimidate the Israeli population, it would marginalize the state and extinguish the condition of conflict.​

I find it odd that the Arab Palestinians are so tied-up in themselves and believe so hard that it is all about them, that they have absolutely no regard for the lives of anyone else (especially the innocent). They have absolutely no understanding of the Customary and International Humanitarian Laws (IHL). The Arab Palestinians have no moral qualms, although they pretend to (some right here in this discussion group). And that is the scary part; they are the great pretenders. And while we, on this side of the great blue pond, may have difficulty seeing it - because they make it appear that something is the case when in fact it is not, the people in the region have no trouble at all because they are up close and on the receiving end of their deception.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Arab Palestinians exhibit an extreme lack of conscience in dealing with the Jewish people and a range of actions including murderous activities directed at the Israeli.

And for no reason, of course.

Bulldozing Peace

Your habit of spamming threads with YouTube videos as a means to deflect has been addressed previously.

All relevant, of course.

Spamming suggests otherwise.

Spamming? I have not posted this video before.

 

[Hollie]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Toddsterpatriot, et al,

The character of an organization is a reflection of its membership. Violent organization is violent because the constituents of the organization have violent characteristics.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians exhibit an extreme lack of conscience in dealing with the Jewish people and a range of actions including murderous activities directed at the Israeli.

◈ If you remove the sociopathic behavior of the Arab Palestinians, the intensity of the conflict will be disipated significantly.

◈ If you remove the persistent antisocial behavior of the Arab Palestinian, the magnitude of the conflict diminishes.

◈ If you remove the lack empathy and the lack of regret for the criminal activity committed by the Arab Palestinians against the Israeli → it will minimize the conflict.​

◈ If you remove the Arab Palestinian hostilities, the purpose of such which is to intimidate the Israeli population, it would marginalize the state and extinguish the condition of conflict.​

I find it odd that the Arab Palestinians are so tied-up in themselves and believe so hard that it is all about them, that they have absolutely no regard for the lives of anyone else (especially the innocent). They have absolutely no understanding of the Customary and International Humanitarian Laws (IHL). The Arab Palestinians have no moral qualms, although they pretend to (some right here in this discussion group). And that is the scary part; they are the great pretenders. And while we, on this side of the great blue pond, may have difficulty seeing it - because they make it appear that something is the case when in fact it is not, the people in the region have no trouble at all because they are up close and on the receiving end of their deception.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Arab Palestinians exhibit an extreme lack of conscience in dealing with the Jewish people and a range of actions including murderous activities directed at the Israeli.

And for no reason, of course.

Bulldozing Peace

Your habit of spamming threads with YouTube videos as a means to deflect has been addressed previously.

All relevant, of course.

Spamming suggests otherwise.

Spamming? I have not posted this video before.

Are you depleting your stash of spam videos?

 

[Shusha]

Oh please. There is absolutely no right in international law for a person to have a right of return to a State of which they are not a national.

You need to read up.

Link?

And for the love of everything, please don't post that stupid video again.

Indeed, it goes right over your head.

You haven't posted anything. How can it go over my head.

If you think you have some sort of international law prior to 1948 which guarantees the right of return to countries of which the individual is not a national .... by all means, please post it.

False question.

Yawn. How dull. You used to at least TRY to address my points.

 

[Hollie]

You need to read up.

Link?

And for the love of everything, please don't post that stupid video again.

Indeed, it goes right over your head.

You haven't posted anything. How can it go over my head.

If you think you have some sort of international law prior to 1948 which guarantees the right of return to countries of which the individual is not a national .... by all means, please post it.

False question.

Yawn. How dull. You used to at least TRY to address my points.

Link?

 

[P F Tinmore]

You need to read up.

Link?

And for the love of everything, please don't post that stupid video again.

Indeed, it goes right over your head.

You haven't posted anything. How can it go over my head.

If you think you have some sort of international law prior to 1948 which guarantees the right of return to countries of which the individual is not a national .... by all means, please post it.

False question.

Yawn. How dull. You used to at least TRY to address my points.

I will when you post one.

 

[Shusha]

Link?

And for the love of everything, please don't post that stupid video again.

Indeed, it goes right over your head.

You haven't posted anything. How can it go over my head.

If you think you have some sort of international law prior to 1948 which guarantees the right of return to countries of which the individual is not a national .... by all means, please post it.

False question.

Yawn. How dull. You used to at least TRY to address my points.

I will when you post one.

No you won’t. You’ll just ignore it or dodge it like you always do.

The point on the table is addressing the legal ‘right of return’ for Arab non-nationals to Israel

 

[Shusha]

Link?

And for the love of everything, please don't post that stupid video again.

Indeed, it goes right over your head.

You haven't posted anything. How can it go over my head.

If you think you have some sort of international law prior to 1948 which guarantees the right of return to countries of which the individual is not a national .... by all means, please post it.

False question.

Yawn. How dull. You used to at least TRY to address my points.

Link?

You'd have to go back years.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Judge rules pro-Israel students cannot anonymously sue UMass Amherst over Palestine event

The case continues…for now

You may not be aware, but the lawsuit against the University of Massachusetts Amherst over its May event “Not Backing Down: Israel, Free Speech and the Battle for Palestinian Human Rights,” is still in play (sort of).

Last spring, UMass Amherst made headlines when three anonymous pro-Israel students tried — and failed — to get a court to bar a panel featuring Marc Lamont Hill, Linda Sarsour, Roger Waters, Dave Zirin, and moderator Vijay Prashad from taking place on campus.

A Boston judge denied the preliminary injunction and the panel, which was organized by the Media Education Foundation, along with Jewish Voice for Peace Western Mass and other groups proceeded as planned on May 4. Over 2,000 people attended the event.

While the court allowed the event to take place, the anonymous plaintiffs did not drop the lawsuit, and the question of whether UMass Amherst violated Massachusetts discrimination laws and breached its contract with the anonymous pro-Israeli students is still before the court. But that lawsuit is now in limbo.

In an unexpected footnote, the court also acknowledged that meritless legal complaints are often a strategy to harass university administrators into censoring speech. The judge cited current Trump Administration official and former pro-Israel lobbyist Kenneth Marcus, who wrote in 2013 that pro-Israel groups intend to "expose administrators to bad publicity" through bringing accusations of antisemitism against them for allowing pro-Palestinian activity on campus.

 

[Hollie]

Judge rules pro-Israel students cannot anonymously sue UMass Amherst over Palestine event

The case continues…for now

You may not be aware, but the lawsuit against the University of Massachusetts Amherst over its May event “Not Backing Down: Israel, Free Speech and the Battle for Palestinian Human Rights,” is still in play (sort of).

Last spring, UMass Amherst made headlines when three anonymous pro-Israel students tried — and failed — to get a court to bar a panel featuring Marc Lamont Hill, Linda Sarsour, Roger Waters, Dave Zirin, and moderator Vijay Prashad from taking place on campus.

A Boston judge denied the preliminary injunction and the panel, which was organized by the Media Education Foundation, along with Jewish Voice for Peace Western Mass and other groups proceeded as planned on May 4. Over 2,000 people attended the event.

While the court allowed the event to take place, the anonymous plaintiffs did not drop the lawsuit, and the question of whether UMass Amherst violated Massachusetts discrimination laws and breached its contract with the anonymous pro-Israeli students is still before the court. But that lawsuit is now in limbo.

In an unexpected footnote, the court also acknowledged that meritless legal complaints are often a strategy to harass university administrators into censoring speech. The judge cited current Trump Administration official and former pro-Israel lobbyist Kenneth Marcus, who wrote in 2013 that pro-Israel groups intend to "expose administrators to bad publicity" through bringing accusations of antisemitism against them for allowing pro-Palestinian activity on campus.

Looks like a roll call of Jew hating attention seekers. Your kinda’ crowd.

Are you going to attend? You can bring your Pom Poms and lead the “Death to Jews” chants.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Judge rules pro-Israel students cannot anonymously sue UMass Amherst over Palestine event

The case continues…for now

You may not be aware, but the lawsuit against the University of Massachusetts Amherst over its May event “Not Backing Down: Israel, Free Speech and the Battle for Palestinian Human Rights,” is still in play (sort of).

Last spring, UMass Amherst made headlines when three anonymous pro-Israel students tried — and failed — to get a court to bar a panel featuring Marc Lamont Hill, Linda Sarsour, Roger Waters, Dave Zirin, and moderator Vijay Prashad from taking place on campus.

A Boston judge denied the preliminary injunction and the panel, which was organized by the Media Education Foundation, along with Jewish Voice for Peace Western Mass and other groups proceeded as planned on May 4. Over 2,000 people attended the event.

While the court allowed the event to take place, the anonymous plaintiffs did not drop the lawsuit, and the question of whether UMass Amherst violated Massachusetts discrimination laws and breached its contract with the anonymous pro-Israeli students is still before the court. But that lawsuit is now in limbo.

In an unexpected footnote, the court also acknowledged that meritless legal complaints are often a strategy to harass university administrators into censoring speech. The judge cited current Trump Administration official and former pro-Israel lobbyist Kenneth Marcus, who wrote in 2013 that pro-Israel groups intend to "expose administrators to bad publicity" through bringing accusations of antisemitism against them for allowing pro-Palestinian activity on campus.

Looks like a roll call of Jew hating attention seekers. Your kinda’ crowd.

Are you going to attend? You can bring your Pom Poms and lead the “Death to Jews” chants.

Already took place.

Palestine Today

 

[Hollie]

Judge rules pro-Israel students cannot anonymously sue UMass Amherst over Palestine event

The case continues…for now

You may not be aware, but the lawsuit against the University of Massachusetts Amherst over its May event “Not Backing Down: Israel, Free Speech and the Battle for Palestinian Human Rights,” is still in play (sort of).

Last spring, UMass Amherst made headlines when three anonymous pro-Israel students tried — and failed — to get a court to bar a panel featuring Marc Lamont Hill, Linda Sarsour, Roger Waters, Dave Zirin, and moderator Vijay Prashad from taking place on campus.

A Boston judge denied the preliminary injunction and the panel, which was organized by the Media Education Foundation, along with Jewish Voice for Peace Western Mass and other groups proceeded as planned on May 4. Over 2,000 people attended the event.

While the court allowed the event to take place, the anonymous plaintiffs did not drop the lawsuit, and the question of whether UMass Amherst violated Massachusetts discrimination laws and breached its contract with the anonymous pro-Israeli students is still before the court. But that lawsuit is now in limbo.

In an unexpected footnote, the court also acknowledged that meritless legal complaints are often a strategy to harass university administrators into censoring speech. The judge cited current Trump Administration official and former pro-Israel lobbyist Kenneth Marcus, who wrote in 2013 that pro-Israel groups intend to "expose administrators to bad publicity" through bringing accusations of antisemitism against them for allowing pro-Palestinian activity on campus.

Looks like a roll call of Jew hating attention seekers. Your kinda’ crowd.

Are you going to attend? You can bring your Pom Poms and lead the “Death to Jews” chants.

Already took place.

Palestine Today

Did you lead the "Death to Jews", chant?