All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[Sixties Fan]

 

[Sixties Fan]

The Post exhibits similar selectivity elsewhere. For example, the paper has referred to the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) and the Gaza Strip as “Palestinian territories (for example, see “A daily commute through Israel’s checkpoints,” May 29, 2017).” Yet, as CAMERA has informed Post staff—and as the paper acknowledged in a Sept. 5, 2014 correction that it disregards at will—“the status of the territories is disputed and no Palestinian state has ever existed.” Nonetheless, the paper has shown a proclivity for, at times, inaccurately labeling the territories as “Palestinian” instead of “disputed.” It has even defended doing so on the grounds that while it might not be accurate, its use is frequent (“The Washington Post: We Print ‘Commonly Used’ Falsehoods,” CAMERA, June 12, 2017).

(full article online)

CAMERA Snapshots: <I>The Washington Post’s</I> Selective Language on Israel

 

[Sixties Fan]

As regular readers will be aware, since the beginning of this year there have been five separate incidents in which missiles were launched into Israel from the Sinai peninsula and nine additional missile attacks from the Gaza Strip.

The BBC’s English language services have not reported any of those fourteen attacks.

Fortunately – and not least because Israeli civilians are well-drilled in taking appropriate precautions when such incidents take place – none of those attacks resulted in serious injuries or fatalities.

(full article online)

BBC coverage of missile attacks in two ME locations

 

[MJB12741]

Long live the BDS movement!

http://www.israelhayom.com/2017/07/...on-as-one-of-the-worlds-strongest-currencies/

 

[Sixties Fan]

You can learn a lot from Arab satire ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[Sixties Fan]

Israeli min welcomes Saudi mufti's anti-Hamas remarks

 

[Sixties Fan]

Three completely different articles from wildly different Arab and Muslim sources all agree that Israel is behind everything.

(full article online)

Arab and Muslim paranoia about Israel continues ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[Sixties Fan]

The International Committee of the Red Cross, self-appointed guardian of the laws of war, has embarked on an exciting new online project: destroying the very laws it ostensibly seeks to protect. Of course, the ICRC would put it differently; it would say it’s teaching the laws of war. The problem is that the “laws” it teaches aren’t the actual laws of war, as codified in international treaties, but a made-up version that effectively denies countries any right of self-defense against enemies that fight from positions inside civilian populations. And it is thereby teaching anyone unwilling to concede the right of self-defense that the laws of war should simply be ignored.

(full article online)

The Red Cross Destroys the Laws of War

 

[Sixties Fan]

"The conference is aimed at highlighting the suffering of the Palestinian children in view of Israel's violations of the international conventions of the rights of the child.The cynicism of pretending to care about Palestinian children in order to provide a photo op to bash Israel is obvious."

Anyone who truly cares about Palestinian children would insist that they not be taught to throw rocks at Jews. They should not be told on TV shows that murderers are heroes. They should not be taught in schools that martyrdom is their ultimate aspiration for them. They would complain about Hamas' use of children as human shields, about their building tunnels under schools, about their shooting rockets from playgrounds

Arabs saying that they care about Palestinian children is as convincing as...Arabs saying they care about Palestinians.

Certainly no one in the West would be this stupid to believe this transparent ploy of politicizing "children" as a means to attack Israel.

Oh, wait:

" Congresswoman Betty McCollum (DFL-Minn.) today introduced legislation— the Promoting Human Rights by Ending Israeli Military Detention of Palestinian Children Act — to prevent United States tax dollars from supporting the Israeli military’s ongoing detention and mistreatment of Palestinian children."

(full article online)

Let's cynically pretend to care about Palestinian children to attack Israel ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[Sixties Fan]

http://www.jewishpress.com/news/mid...uth-syria-opens-on-israeli-border/2017/11/15/

 

[P F Tinmore]

The International Committee of the Red Cross, self-appointed guardian of the laws of war, has embarked on an exciting new online project: destroying the very laws it ostensibly seeks to protect. Of course, the ICRC would put it differently; it would say it’s teaching the laws of war. The problem is that the “laws” it teaches aren’t the actual laws of war, as codified in international treaties, but a made-up version that effectively denies countries any right of self-defense against enemies that fight from positions inside civilian populations. And it is thereby teaching anyone unwilling to concede the right of self-defense that the laws of war should simply be ignored.

(full article online)

The Red Cross Destroys the Laws of War

Israel believes that it is OK to level entire neighborhoods or villages to get a few fighters.

 

[Sixties Fan]

The International Committee of the Red Cross, self-appointed guardian of the laws of war, has embarked on an exciting new online project: destroying the very laws it ostensibly seeks to protect. Of course, the ICRC would put it differently; it would say it’s teaching the laws of war. The problem is that the “laws” it teaches aren’t the actual laws of war, as codified in international treaties, but a made-up version that effectively denies countries any right of self-defense against enemies that fight from positions inside civilian populations. And it is thereby teaching anyone unwilling to concede the right of self-defense that the laws of war should simply be ignored.

(full article online)

The Red Cross Destroys the Laws of War

Israel believes that it is OK to level entire neighborhoods or villages to get a few fighters.

Shall I get videos and articles as to what the USA, Russia and others have done in certain areas of the world in order to get "some fighters" ?

And without the Roof Knocking Israel bothers to do.

But of course, if some people would just stop firing rockets from civilian areas, or making their civilians believe that they are going to become Martyrs or brides for those Martyrs.....


Guess what would happen !!!

 

[Sixties Fan]

The Line Between Criticism and Demonization of Israel (Daled Amos) ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[P F Tinmore]

The International Committee of the Red Cross, self-appointed guardian of the laws of war, has embarked on an exciting new online project: destroying the very laws it ostensibly seeks to protect. Of course, the ICRC would put it differently; it would say it’s teaching the laws of war. The problem is that the “laws” it teaches aren’t the actual laws of war, as codified in international treaties, but a made-up version that effectively denies countries any right of self-defense against enemies that fight from positions inside civilian populations. And it is thereby teaching anyone unwilling to concede the right of self-defense that the laws of war should simply be ignored.

(full article online)

The Red Cross Destroys the Laws of War

Israel believes that it is OK to level entire neighborhoods or villages to get a few fighters.

Shall I get videos and articles as to what the USA, Russia and others have done in certain areas of the world in order to get "some fighters" ?

And without the Roof Knocking Israel bothers to do.

But of course, if some people would just stop firing rockets from civilian areas, or making their civilians believe that they are going to become Martyrs or brides for those Martyrs.....


Guess what would happen !!!

The siege would continue. That is a daily act of war against the Palestinians.

 

[Sixties Fan]

The International Committee of the Red Cross, self-appointed guardian of the laws of war, has embarked on an exciting new online project: destroying the very laws it ostensibly seeks to protect. Of course, the ICRC would put it differently; it would say it’s teaching the laws of war. The problem is that the “laws” it teaches aren’t the actual laws of war, as codified in international treaties, but a made-up version that effectively denies countries any right of self-defense against enemies that fight from positions inside civilian populations. And it is thereby teaching anyone unwilling to concede the right of self-defense that the laws of war should simply be ignored.

(full article online)

The Red Cross Destroys the Laws of War

Israel believes that it is OK to level entire neighborhoods or villages to get a few fighters.

Shall I get videos and articles as to what the USA, Russia and others have done in certain areas of the world in order to get "some fighters" ?

And without the Roof Knocking Israel bothers to do.

But of course, if some people would just stop firing rockets from civilian areas, or making their civilians believe that they are going to become Martyrs or brides for those Martyrs.....


Guess what would happen !!!

The siege would continue. That is a daily act of war against the Palestinians.

Started by Al-Husseini with the 1920 Riots against the Jews.
And then 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939, 1948, 1956, 1967, 1973.......

The WAR was the Muslims against the Jews over the Jewish ancient homeland.

Who are the ones who have the right to defend themselves against Muslim aggression?

Uhmmmmmm

 

[P F Tinmore]

The International Committee of the Red Cross, self-appointed guardian of the laws of war, has embarked on an exciting new online project: destroying the very laws it ostensibly seeks to protect. Of course, the ICRC would put it differently; it would say it’s teaching the laws of war. The problem is that the “laws” it teaches aren’t the actual laws of war, as codified in international treaties, but a made-up version that effectively denies countries any right of self-defense against enemies that fight from positions inside civilian populations. And it is thereby teaching anyone unwilling to concede the right of self-defense that the laws of war should simply be ignored.

(full article online)

The Red Cross Destroys the Laws of War

Israel believes that it is OK to level entire neighborhoods or villages to get a few fighters.

Shall I get videos and articles as to what the USA, Russia and others have done in certain areas of the world in order to get "some fighters" ?

And without the Roof Knocking Israel bothers to do.

But of course, if some people would just stop firing rockets from civilian areas, or making their civilians believe that they are going to become Martyrs or brides for those Martyrs.....


Guess what would happen !!!

The siege would continue. That is a daily act of war against the Palestinians.

Started by Al-Husseini with the 1920 Riots against the Jews.
And then 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939, 1948, 1956, 1967, 1973.......

The WAR was the Muslims against the Jews over the Jewish ancient homeland.

Who are the ones who have the right to defend themselves against Muslim aggression?

Uhmmmmmm

Zionuts, always starting history in the middle.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The International Committee of the Red Cross, self-appointed guardian of the laws of war, has embarked on an exciting new online project: destroying the very laws it ostensibly seeks to protect. Of course, the ICRC would put it differently; it would say it’s teaching the laws of war. The problem is that the “laws” it teaches aren’t the actual laws of war, as codified in international treaties, but a made-up version that effectively denies countries any right of self-defense against enemies that fight from positions inside civilian populations. And it is thereby teaching anyone unwilling to concede the right of self-defense that the laws of war should simply be ignored.

(full article online)

The Red Cross Destroys the Laws of War

Israel believes that it is OK to level entire neighborhoods or villages to get a few fighters.

Shall I get videos and articles as to what the USA, Russia and others have done in certain areas of the world in order to get "some fighters" ?

And without the Roof Knocking Israel bothers to do.

But of course, if some people would just stop firing rockets from civilian areas, or making their civilians believe that they are going to become Martyrs or brides for those Martyrs.....


Guess what would happen !!!

The siege would continue. That is a daily act of war against the Palestinians.

Started by Al-Husseini with the 1920 Riots against the Jews.
And then 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939, 1948, 1956, 1967, 1973.......

The WAR was the Muslims against the Jews over the Jewish ancient homeland.

Who are the ones who have the right to defend themselves against Muslim aggression?

Uhmmmmmm

Who are the ones who have the right to defend themselves against Muslim aggression?

Indeed, the Palestinians should have never gone to Europe and attack the Zionists.

 

[Hollie]

The International Committee of the Red Cross, self-appointed guardian of the laws of war, has embarked on an exciting new online project: destroying the very laws it ostensibly seeks to protect. Of course, the ICRC would put it differently; it would say it’s teaching the laws of war. The problem is that the “laws” it teaches aren’t the actual laws of war, as codified in international treaties, but a made-up version that effectively denies countries any right of self-defense against enemies that fight from positions inside civilian populations. And it is thereby teaching anyone unwilling to concede the right of self-defense that the laws of war should simply be ignored.

(full article online)

The Red Cross Destroys the Laws of War

Israel believes that it is OK to level entire neighborhoods or villages to get a few fighters.

Islamic terrorists believe it is OK to commit acts of Islamic terrorism using “Pal’istanians” as human shields knowing that Israel is obligated to respond to acts of war.

Why should anyone expect that Islamic terrorists are entitled to acts of Islamic terrorism without consequence?

 

[Hollie]

The International Committee of the Red Cross, self-appointed guardian of the laws of war, has embarked on an exciting new online project: destroying the very laws it ostensibly seeks to protect. Of course, the ICRC would put it differently; it would say it’s teaching the laws of war. The problem is that the “laws” it teaches aren’t the actual laws of war, as codified in international treaties, but a made-up version that effectively denies countries any right of self-defense against enemies that fight from positions inside civilian populations. And it is thereby teaching anyone unwilling to concede the right of self-defense that the laws of war should simply be ignored.

(full article online)

The Red Cross Destroys the Laws of War

Israel believes that it is OK to level entire neighborhoods or villages to get a few fighters.

Shall I get videos and articles as to what the USA, Russia and others have done in certain areas of the world in order to get "some fighters" ?

And without the Roof Knocking Israel bothers to do.

But of course, if some people would just stop firing rockets from civilian areas, or making their civilians believe that they are going to become Martyrs or brides for those Martyrs.....


Guess what would happen !!!

The siege would continue. That is a daily act of war against the Palestinians.

Started by Al-Husseini with the 1920 Riots against the Jews.
And then 1921, 1929, 1936 to 1939, 1948, 1956, 1967, 1973.......

The WAR was the Muslims against the Jews over the Jewish ancient homeland.

Who are the ones who have the right to defend themselves against Muslim aggression?

Uhmmmmmm

Who are the ones who have the right to defend themselves against Muslim aggression?

Indeed, the Palestinians should have never gone to Europe and attack the Zionists.

Indeed, Arabs-Moslems did go to Europe, albeit earlier, to attack The Zionists and everyone else. They were eventually defeated.

And Allah knows best.