All planets in solar system are warming up?

[Olde Europe]

www.space.news? Really.

And, can you detect why the OP likes the source? Ah, make that "source".

Their is no doubt that human activity is impacting climate change.​

 

[mamooth]

Pay no attention to the warming of every planet in the solar system.

I won't, because it's a fictional story. It's just another one of the mandated idiot beliefs of your loopy crank political cult.

Remember, you're not talking to your paste-eating cult brethren. You're talking to normal people. We know the facts, hence we know with 100% certainty that you're peddling a lie.

There’s no funding to study such foolishness. There is only funding for science that is useful for governments to raise taxes.

Sucks to be you. All the hard data contradicts your cult beliefs, so you're forced to invent weepy conspiracy theories to explain away that inconvenient fact.

 

[Crick]

A good discussion of the supposed system-wide warming of the planets: Hot times in the Solar System : Nature News

I see from this a comment I made earlier here concerning Pluto was incorrect. Mea culpa.

 

[Billy_Bob]

LOL..

If the other planets are warming at the same rate as the earth, which the paper clearly states it is, then the warming is not caused by what we are doing. It is being caused by a COMMON EXTERNAL FORCE called THE SUN...

There are going to be some mighty upset warmers in here real soon...

Two of the items that no current GCM takes into account are changes in the earths atmospheric depth and another is the changes in the spectral output of the down-welling solar radiation. A recent paper looks at this very question.

Abstract:

"We have identified a sample of 33 Sun-like stars observed by the International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE) with the short-wavelength spectrographs that have ground-based detections of chromospheric Ca ii H+K activity. Our objective is to determine if these observations can provide an estimate of the decrease in ultraviolet (UV) surface flux associated with a transition from a normal stellar cycle to a grand-minimum state. The activity detections, corrected to solar metallicity, span the range $-5.16\lt \mathrm{log}{R}_{{HK}}^{{\prime} }\lt -4.26$, and eight stars have log ${R}_{{HK}}^{{\prime} }\lt -5.00$. The IUE-observed flux spectra are integrated over the wavelength range 1250–1910 Å, transformed to surface fluxes, and then normalized to solar B − V. These normalized surface fluxes show a strong linear relationship with activity ${R}_{{HK}}^{{\prime} }$ (R 2 = 0.857 after three outliers are omitted). From this linear regression we estimate a range in UV flux of 9.3% over solar cycle 22 and a reduction of 6.9% below solar cycle minimum under a grand minimum. The 95% confidence interval in this grand-minimum estimate is 5.5%–8.4%. An alternative estimate is provided by the IUE observations of τ Cet (HD 10700), a star having strong evidence of being in a grand-minimum state, and this star's normalized surface flux is 23.0 ± 5.7% lower than solar cycle minimum."

source

As you can see, a UV decrease of almost 9% is expected and will last 60-90 years. This will cause massive cooling of the oceans all by itself. If the solar wind stays low, the increased equatorial atmosphere will cause further loss of energy to the oceans. We could see upwards of a 12-14% drop in the UV spectrum, at sea level, from our sun for a prolonged period of time. The loss net effect of 4.1-6.8 W/m^2.

We are in for some serious cooling. Let us hope that the sun doesn't go to sleep and stay asleep for 90,000 years before it becomes active again. We still don't know the primary causes of our Glacial Cycles but this could very well be the cause.

The current warming of our solar system will be short lived as this reduced output state is going to last a long while.

many scientist believe that we are do for another ice age ! they believe that before each ice age there in slight warming before the temps plummet .

In every instance prior to settling into a glacial phase, there is a warming spike of about 1-2 deg C and then rapid cooling. This is what we are seeing today. No one however, really knows if this is it, with all of the unkowns. But if you look at physical indicators, of the last 450 thousand years those glacial cycles are predictable and very closely the same.

 

[Billy_Bob]

www.space.news? Really.

And, can you detect why the OP likes the source? Ah, make that "source".

Their is no doubt that human activity is impacting climate change.​

Please define what man is responsible for and how you removed Natural Variation..

 

[Billy_Bob]

I see the usual idiots have no clue what it is we are observing. Lets bring out the crayons for the idiots..

Down-welling UV (0.2um-1.4um), a narrow band width of energy from the sun that the atmosphere does very little to stop and penetrates the oceans to some 700 meters in depth. This is the primary region and cause of ocean warming. A 4-6% loss of energy in this band will cause glaciation and has caused past glaciations, even at levels of CO2 above 7,000ppm.

CO2 does very little in our atmosphere and is a bit player. Those who claim it has magical powers and that its "back-radiation" of 12um-16um warm the planet can not do the math as this band of energy, can not even penetrate the skin of the oceans.

Rapid changes are already occurring on earth due to this UV fallout of energy. Its really sad that these people have their heads so far up their asses and computer models they cant see the forest through the trees.. The ocean buffer is at or near being expended. It wont take much more time before cooling is fully global. This winter alone the Northern Hemisphere average temperature has cooled 0.8 deg C.

 

[Billy_Bob]

I'm not addressing the nonsense of the OP, just his claim that it was a bad thing that a jet to France and back should use as much fuel as an SUV burned in a year.

You're ignoring the OP because it falsified your "settled science"

Anything that can clearly disprove the "man made" claim is ignored and scoffed at. It is also the very thing that will kill millions because we failed to prepare for it.

Its a sad day that science is ignored for power gain.

 

[Crick]

Billy, do you believe every planet in the solar system is warming and that it is because of some change in the sun?

Obviously, your statements indicate that you do. Why don't you show us some "science" that supports that contention?

 

[ding]

Pay no attention to the warming of every planet in the solar system.

I won't, because it's a fictional story. It's just another one of the mandated idiot beliefs of your loopy crank political cult.

Remember, you're not talking to your paste-eating cult brethren. You're talking to normal people. We know the facts, hence we know with 100% certainty that you're peddling a lie.

There’s no funding to study such foolishness. There is only funding for science that is useful for governments to raise taxes.

Sucks to be you. All the hard data contradicts your cult beliefs, so you're forced to invent weepy conspiracy theories to explain away that inconvenient fact.

The hard data that no one refuted is that we are still in the normal range for an interglacial cycle. We still have another 2C before we are outside of the norm.