Alito votes to block trump sentencing after totally unrelated private phone call the day before.

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
54,284
Reaction score
24,576
Points
2,300
Location
Y Cae Ras

Even the handmaid judge thought this was a step too far. Alito should have recused himself from the process.
But he has no honour. Of course Thomas sided with trump as did the drunken rapist.
This is how the cancer spreads through all of society.
The US experiment in democracy is over.
 
Alito does not give a shit about his personal integrity

Discussing an upcoming case hours before it is filed with one of the litigants is unethical

The claim that they only discussed the hiring of an obscure aid is laughable. Trump has staff that can follow up on the resume of a potential hire.
To think that Trump himself would call a Supreme Court Justice and not discuss the case shows how stupid they think the public is
 

Even the handmaid judge thought this was a step too far. Alito should have recused himself from the process.
But he has no honour. Of course Thomas sided with trump as did the drunken rapist.
This is how the cancer spreads through all of society.
The US experiment in democracy is over.
Don't worry. We still have John Roberts who so desperately wants to be liked by the nutso left.
But as for you criticizing the American experiment, I would advise you to attend to your own over-the-hill irrelevant 2nd-world country.
 
Alito does not give a shit about his personal integrity

Discussing an upcoming case hours before it is filed with one of the litigants is unethical

The claim that they only discussed the hiring of an obscure aid is laughable. Trump has staff that can follow up on the resume of a potential hire.
To think that Trump himself would call a Supreme Court Justice and not discuss the case shows how stupid they think the public is
Gah, I wish I could just make shit up and actually believe it. What it would be like to be a child again ;P
 
Gah, I wish I could just make shit up and actually believe it. What it would be like to be a child again ;P
Alito just doesn’t give a shit about his credibility as a Justice.

It was well known that Trump would be appealing to the Supreme Court. To even accept a call from Trump is inappropriate

Then to make up such a shallow lie to explain it shows how little respect he has for the Court and the American people
 
Don't worry. We still have John Roberts who so desperately wants to be liked by the nutso left.

This is Robert’s Court and Robert’s legacy.

He understands the perception that this court is partisan to Trump……To once again jump in to save him would seal the deal
 
Alito does not give a shit about his personal integrity

Discussing an upcoming case hours before it is filed with one of the litigants is unethical

The claim that they only discussed the hiring of an obscure aid is laughable. Trump has staff that can follow up on the resume of a potential hire.
To think that Trump himself would call a Supreme Court Justice and not discuss the case shows how stupid they think the public is
I guess it shows us who is te most corript person on the SC, Trump didnt even need to call Thomas. Clarence knows what to do without even needing to be told.
 
Don't worry. We still have John Roberts who so desperately wants to be liked by the nutso left.
But as for you criticizing the American experiment, I would advise you to attend to your own over-the-hill irrelevant 2nd-world country.
What about the thread topic. Corruption in the highest US court ?
 
Alito just doesn’t give a shit about his credibility as a Justice.

It was well known that Trump would be appealing to the Supreme Court. To even accept a call from Trump is inappropriate

Then to make up such a shallow lie to explain it shows how little respect he has for the Court and the American people
Lol
You people are so fucking disingenuous
 

Opinion by Brett Tolman
Lawfare doesn’t begin to describe the legal circus we’re witnessing this week as a state judge and prosecutor thumb their noses at our U.S. Supreme Court. Despite the Justices’ easy-to-understand immunity ruling months ago, Judge Juan Merchan’s petulant ego threatens to undermine our entire constitution by refusing to concede that People v. Trump is legally and procedurally flawed and should be dismissed.
As a nation committed to justice and the rule of law, this criminal case poses a grave threat to judicial impartiality and the public's faith in our criminal justice system. A judiciary that disproportionately defers prosecutorial authority undermines its constitutional role as a check on government power.

From its inception, this case has been marred by political overtones. The charges against Trump—34 counts of falsifying business records—may hold technical validity, but there’s no hiding that the broader context serves ulterior motives. Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan District Attorney, pursued this case not in the "interest of justice," as required by the U.S. Supreme Court, but in a politically charged atmosphere that undermines public trust.
 

Opinion by Brett Tolman
Lawfare doesn’t begin to describe the legal circus we’re witnessing this week as a state judge and prosecutor thumb their noses at our U.S. Supreme Court. Despite the Justices’ easy-to-understand immunity ruling months ago, Judge Juan Merchan’s petulant ego threatens to undermine our entire constitution by refusing to concede that People v. Trump is legally and procedurally flawed and should be dismissed.
As a nation committed to justice and the rule of law, this criminal case poses a grave threat to judicial impartiality and the public's faith in our criminal justice system. A judiciary that disproportionately defers prosecutorial authority undermines its constitutional role as a check on government power.

From its inception, this case has been marred by political overtones. The charges against Trump—34 counts of falsifying business records—may hold technical validity, but there’s no hiding that the broader context serves ulterior motives. Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan District Attorney, pursued this case not in the "interest of justice," as required by the U.S. Supreme Court, but in a politically charged atmosphere that undermines public trust.
Immunity does not apply to actions before you were president
 
But kudos to ABC for breaking the story and risking the wrath of trump.
One part of american life still survives in its free press.
I suspect they will pay for this crime.

Oh, please the all that was discussed on the call was golf and grandkids...

hqdefault.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom