Alexandria.Never Brings Up All Of The Climate Predictions Of The 70's & 80's.Why Not?

Donkey Face Sandy Cortez claimed she had braces as a teen in her home town in expensive Westchester County New York. Curious as who the orthodontist was and why he did not extract those extra teeth.
 
Last edited:
And to this day, has anyone ever asked the princess questions regarding all of those doom and gloom predictions of the last 40 to 50 years?
Wasn't Los Angeles and Florida supposed to be under water by 2000/2010?
What about New York and London? Not sure, but weren't they supposed to be under water at some point after 1990/2000?
And what about the coming of the next ice age?
What about the genius Al Gore? what did he predict? Eventually polar bears will be living on sheets of ice,,and that our children will never see snow?
Has any reporter ever brought up these predictions to Princess Alexandria?
And now she is making similar predictions?
:iyfyus.jpg: :CryingCow:
She could be as clueless about them as other areas where her ignorance shines.
 
She talks and gestures like a high school cheerleader practicing the routine
 
And to this day, has anyone ever asked the princess questions regarding all of those doom and gloom predictions of the last 40 to 50 years?
Wasn't Los Angeles and Florida supposed to be under water by 2000/2010?
What about New York and London? Not sure, but weren't they supposed to be under water at some point after 1990/2000?
And what about the coming of the next ice age?
What about the genius Al Gore? what did he predict? Eventually polar bears will be living on sheets of ice,,and that our children will never see snow?
Has any reporter ever brought up these predictions to Princess Alexandria?
And now she is making similar predictions?
:iyfyus.jpg: :CryingCow:
Bump
 
regarding all of those doom and gloom predictions of the last 40 to 50 years?
Wasn't Los Angeles and Florida supposed to be under water by 2000/2010?
What about New York and London? Not sure, but weren't they supposed to be under water at some point after 1990/2000?
And what about the coming of the next ice age?
What about the genius Al Gore? what did he predict?

Well, what did Conservatives predict 40-50 years ago?

That there was no such thing as climate change, that it is all a hoax that we do not have to do anything
 
Well, what did Conservatives predict 40-50 years ago?

That there was no such thing as climate change, that it is all a hoax that we do not have to do anything
There is very little we can do about it as it is nature. There is the option of conquering it the best we can by building/repairing real infrastructure. A lot of what we see is of our own making where we build. Barrier islands and flood plains are a good portion of it. We know what weather was in the past. But compared to the last century ago, it is primitive. So we get all excited and out of joint by the architects of fear who make a lot of money on us in all ways. Like now.
 
Well, what did Conservatives predict 40-50 years ago?

That there was no such thing as climate change, that it is all a hoax that we do not have to do anything
Am I the only one who heard "There is no such thing as man made climate change, because God is in charge, and he will never let us do anything to harm nature" It was a common sermon in Southern Baptist churches.
 
What did liberals predict about Climate a change 40-50 years ago?
Maybe they thought it would accelerate faster than it did, but they were right about the affects of Climate Change…..Glaciers in Greenland and Alaska melting, more frequent and severe hurricanes, forest fires, droughts

How did Conservatives blocking action against Climate Change work out for us?
 
What did liberals predict about Climate a change 40-50 years ago?
Maybe they thought it would accelerate faster than it did, but they were right about the affects of Climate Change…..Glaciers in Greenland and Alaska melting, more frequent and severe hurricanes, forest fires, droughts

How did Conservatives blocking action against Climate Change work out for us?
7 inches of rain in one hour, events.... Too.
 
More data has been found since then. Only a fool would refuse to go by the most recent and complete data. If new discoveries are found, the prevailing scientific beliefs will change to match that as well. That's how science works, dumb ass.

But science based on climate has constantly been changing.

In the 50s atomic energy was going to mutate life and they knew it for absolute certainty without a doubt. In the 70s we knew for absolute certainty without a doubt nuclear energy was sending us into an ice age. In the 80 it was all about we knew for absolute certainty without a doubt the ozone layer would be destroyed and the planet baked. Now we're certain beyond a shadow of a doubt c02 levels will kill us all.

So it isn't that we that the data is new, it's all together seperate contructs of our demise. They every so often changes what will kill us and how and just completely forget about what was going to kill us before.

Atomic energy, nuclear energy, ozone, c02, politicians always manage to have a new "scientific Boogeyman" exactly what they need it that average people can't see, or prove, or understand completely on their own and we have to just trust them.

And calling people names is also really low and pretty much makes you not worth even considering.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: DBA
But science based on climate has constantly been changing.

In the 50s atomic energy was going to mutate life and they knew it for absolute certainty without a doubt. In the 70s we knew for absolute certainty without a doubt nuclear energy was sending us into an ice age. In the 80 it was all about we knew for absolute certainty without a doubt the ozone layer would be destroyed and the planet baked. Now we're certain beyond a shadow of a doubt c02 levels will kill us all.

So it isn't that we that the data is new, it's all together seperate contructs of our demise. They every so often changes what will kill us and how and just completely forget about what was going to kill us before.

Atomic energy, nuclear energy, ozone, c02, politicians always manage to have a new "scientific Boogeyman" exactly what they need it that average people can't see, or prove, or understand completely on their own and we have to just trust them.

And calling people names is also really low and pretty much makes you not worth even considering.

Climate change is like worrying about a large meteor that is on the path to destroy the earth in 10 years. Granted, there are many variables that could change the trajectory of such a meteor but that wouldn't stop some entrepreneurs and governments from taking full advantage of those that run around with their pants on fire on a daily basis. Five years later when science has determined that the meteor hit another planet and has been eliminated, we are left with some rich entrepreneurs, richer countries, and poorer common folk with less freedom.
 

Forum List

Back
Top