al sharpton trying to get rid of no knock warrents

horselightning

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2013
14,671
7,928
1,928

the race batter strikes again
 
Instead of fixing black culture, he goes after what are not important issues = the problems continue
 
If cops believe you might have a gun nearby when they kick your door down with no warning, they are justifyed in killing you on the spot. Sure. What could go wrong with that?
 
BULLDOG don't be committing crimes or hanging out with criminals --how simple
So we can just forget about any kind of trial then, right? Just kill them and be done with it. Would we have to do away with the entire constitution for that, or just the parts you don't like?
 
No-Knock warrants are one way to tip the scales of Safety; which are typically overbalanced towards the Bad Guys (criminals); back towards the side of the Good Guys (police).

Until the criminals start playing fair/by the rules, we need to give the police every advantage possible.
 
BULLDOG the blacks always side with the criminals. No wonder their race is a failure. Blacks commit crime at much, much higher rates. Gee and they hate the police -! SHOCK
 
No-Knock warrants are one way to tip the scales of Safety; which are typically overbalanced towards the Bad Guys (criminals); back towards the side of the Good Guys (police).

Until the criminals start playing fair/by the rules, we need to give the police every advantage possible.
The ability to burst into a person's home without warning, and kill them on sight would certainly give the cops an advantage.
 
BULLDOG Police rarely kill anyone considering the tens of millions of arrests, traffic stops, and contacts. And when they do, it is usually justifiable. There will always be mistakes -they are human
 
The ability to burst into a person's home and kill them on sight would certainly give the cops an advantage.
Yes it would, and so long as the individual is already a convicted criminal, or the officers can prove they are a potential threat to officers, I’m all for that.

Of course those officers should not be exerting lethal force until the criminal either disobeys their commands or reaches for a weapon; but the moment they do, all bets should be off.
 
BULLDOG self defense is everybody's right. The criminal is in the wrong, not the police
Would everybody include the person who just unexpectedly had his door kicked in, and doesn't yet even know who did the kicking, or why?
 
BULLDOG
Hey, most of those shot by police are criminals. Those shootings are justified. Blacks murder 8 blacks every day. now, you tell me, what Sharpton should be trying to fix
 
How about "rent-a-riot" pays the $7 million he owes in federal income taxes... and then he can have a voice in this country, albeit race-baiting hysteria. Until then..... nothing.
 
BULLDOG the blacks always side with the criminals. No wonder their race is a failure. Blacks commit crime at much, much higher rates. Gee and they hate the police -! SHOCK
And police kill more unarmed blacks than whites at a 3 to 1 rate. Gee, I wonder why they hate the police.
 
No Knock Warrants can be problematic.

For one, the cops better make damn sure that they have the right place and don't go busting in on innocent people. Also, even if the cops identify themselves as police, it can be confusing to those being "invaded". How do people in the moment of a surprise of the cops busting in know that its really the cops and not criminal invaders lying about being cops. Many people will shoot first and ask questions later exercising their second amendment rights and the castle doctrine. And even criminals are to be presumed innocent until proven guilty and may be legally defending themselves at the time.
 
BULLDOG Police rarely kill anyone considering the tens of millions of arrests, traffic stops, and contacts. And when they do, it is usually justifiable. There will always be mistakes -they are human
3 to 1. Those odds really suck.
 

Forum List

Back
Top