AG Barr's investigation about the IG report (Video)

[AzogtheDefiler]

unny as the Mueller Report didn’t find anything criminal and you stated otherwise.

Yes, it did. It found a lot of criminality from Trump associates and where Trump himself had obstructed justice. This is why Barr had to lie about what was in it. Mueller left the issue of impeachment up to Congress... which it chose not to do anything about because Trump would never be stupid enough to try something like that again.... oh, wait. He totally did.

List the “criminal activity” he found.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You guys love you some process crimes. Accuse somone of anything and then hope they do virtually anything to defend themselves or protect their privacy so you can get them on obstruction. Innocent until proven guilty is the Democrats way Remember Pelosi wanted to impeach Trump supposedly PRIOR to having any information from the whistleblower. Frankly, Democratic voters are so stupid, the Democratic policiticans can get away with virtually anything without raising the eyebrows of their minions.

Uh, guy, after Ken Starr spent 70 million dollars persecuting everyone Clinton knew for "Process" crimes only to admit the only thing he found Clinton to be guilty of is lying about a blow job, you really have no business to talk.

The fact is, Pelosi was reluctant to impeach... until Trump got caught red handed trying to shake down the Ukraine.

That is not what happened. Why do you keep lying?

 

[SweetTea]

Well worth a watch.

If I were a Democrat, I'd think about not making too many more statement's they'll have to eat.

Again, if he or Durham drag anyone into court, that person can point to Horowitz's report and say, "See, no political bias, no illegal survellience".

Done.

Oh, yeah, and any trial would take place in Washington DC, where they voted 96% of Hillary. Good luck finding a jury willing to buy Durham's bullshit.

Just thought I would point out just how wrong you were about Horowitz;s conclusion re. political bias. He NEVER reached the conclusion that there was none. That was another farce by the MSM and you lapped it up because you wanted it so much to be true. The MSM LIED....for the thousandth time. Go figure.

FBI -- Michael Horowitz Pushes Back on Claim that He Exonerated FBI of Political Bias | National Review

 

[MAGAman]

The FISA Court just DESTROYED your parroted lies and false narratives. The evidence is undeniable, to the point where the FISA Court came out and released an un-precedented rebuke of Obama's DOJ & FBI for historic levels of crime by committing FISA Court abuses that have consisted of committing crimes, violating the Constitution, and trampling citizens' rights..

Ho-hum.... you guys had no problem with FISA doing this when it was doing it to brown people.

Carter Page was NOT 'double-dealing'. What some idiots, like you it seems, still don't know / understand Page was an official INTELLIGENCE SOURCE, which means the DEEP STATE INTEL COMMUNITY already knew Page was having contact with Russians and was providing information on that contract.

Um... yeah, and pretty clearly they didn't trust him, which is why they wanted a wiretap.

I'm not sure why you are soooooo concerned about the rights of a supposed double agent who was willing to sell this country out.

Oh, that's right. Because he's pals with Cheeto Jesus.

This wa never done to brown people.

The FISA Court just DESTROYED your parroted lies and false narratives. The evidence is undeniable, to the point where the FISA Court came out and released an un-precedented rebuke of Obama's DOJ & FBI for historic levels of crime by committing FISA Court abuses that have consisted of committing crimes, violating the Constitution, and trampling citizens' rights..

Ho-hum.... you guys had no problem with FISA doing this when it was doing it to brown people.

Carter Page was NOT 'double-dealing'. What some idiots, like you it seems, still don't know / understand Page was an official INTELLIGENCE SOURCE, which means the DEEP STATE INTEL COMMUNITY already knew Page was having contact with Russians and was providing information on that contract.

Um... yeah, and pretty clearly they didn't trust him, which is why they wanted a wiretap.

I'm not sure why you are soooooo concerned about the rights of a supposed double agent who was willing to sell this country out.

Oh, that's right. Because he's pals with Cheeto Jesus.

Stupid people play the race card when they're desperate

Page was a CIA asset. A Patriot. That's why the Obama FBI fabricated false evidence against him to get an illegal warrant.

 

[MAGAman]

Uh, guy, when you are desperate for aid, you aren't being "asked", you are being extorted.

Trump had no business holding up that aid.

Uhhh. Guy/Gal/Whatever... Obama held that same aid up for 8 years.

Trump agreed to the aid weeks ahead of the legislation's due date.


I must say your unwavering support of government corruption is spectacular. I'm sure you'll get a Scooby Snack for your efforts.

 

[JoeB131]

Yes he did. It is perfectly ok for a President to withold aid. Biden and Obama explicitly said they were going to do it if Ukraine didn't do what they asked.

Biden and Obama said they would hold up the aid if a corrupt prosecutor wasn't removed. Kind of sensible, given that this prosecutor was robbing the country blind.

Trump was extorting the country for his personal gain.

 

[JoeB131]

Just thought I would point out just how wrong you were about Horowitz;s conclusion re. political bias. He NEVER reached the conclusion that there was none. That was another farce by the MSM and you lapped it up because you wanted it so much to be true. The MSM LIED....for the thousandth time. Go figure.

He said he couldn't know what was in anyone's mind... not quite the same thing.

Uhhh. Guy/Gal/Whatever... Obama held that same aid up for 8 years.

How could this be? Ukraine and Russia didn't go to war until 2014, so how could Obama have held up aid for 8 years?

Is this more of that Conservative Math?

 

[SweetTea]

Yes he did. It is perfectly ok for a President to withold aid. Biden and Obama explicitly said they were going to do it if Ukraine didn't do what they asked.

Biden and Obama said they would hold up the aid if a corrupt prosecutor wasn't removed. Kind of sensible, given that this prosecutor was robbing the country blind.

Trump was extorting the country for his personal gain.

So Biden's son didn't benefit from the firing of the prosecuter, right? Oh ok.

 

[SweetTea]

Just thought I would point out just how wrong you were about Horowitz;s conclusion re. political bias. He NEVER reached the conclusion that there was none. That was another farce by the MSM and you lapped it up because you wanted it so much to be true. The MSM LIED....for the thousandth time. Go figure.

He said he couldn't know what was in anyone's mind... not quite the same thing.

Uhhh. Guy/Gal/Whatever... Obama held that same aid up for 8 years.

How could this be? Ukraine and Russia didn't go to war until 2014, so how could Obama have held up aid for 8 years?

Is this more of that Conservative Math?

Right, Horowitz said he couldn't read somone's mind. The evidence clearly points towards political bias, but he can't say that is why all the mis-steps occurred. Why did the MSM report that Horowitz said there was no political bias? That is a an intential mis-reporting of the facts to trick you lemmings.

 

[JoeB131]

Right, Horowitz said he couldn't read somone's mind. The evidence clearly points towards political bias, but he can't say that is why all the mis-steps occurred. Why did the MSM report that Horowitz said there was no political bias? That is a an intential mis-reporting of the facts to trick you lemmings.

The evidence clearly points to these guys having a legitimate concern... hence- no criminal referals.

So Biden's son didn't benefit from the firing of the prosecuter, right? Oh ok.

The prosecutor wasn't investigating Bursima at all, and the criminal activity happened before Hunter was hired.

So how did he benefit from the firing again?

 

[SweetTea]

Right, Horowitz said he couldn't read somone's mind. The evidence clearly points towards political bias, but he can't say that is why all the mis-steps occurred. Why did the MSM report that Horowitz said there was no political bias? That is a an intential mis-reporting of the facts to trick you lemmings.

The evidence clearly points to these guys having a legitimate concern... hence- no criminal referals.

So Biden's son didn't benefit from the firing of the prosecuter, right? Oh ok.

The prosecutor wasn't investigating Bursima at all, and the criminal activity happened before Hunter was hired.

So how did he benefit from the firing again?

Some of the evidence was tampered with much left out. Sorry.

As usual, you are confused. Burisma was investigated for tax evasion in both 2014 and 2016. Hunter was hired in April of 2014. Try again.

 

[kyzr]

Right, Horowitz said he couldn't read somone's mind. The evidence clearly points towards political bias, but he can't say that is why all the mis-steps occurred. Why did the MSM report that Horowitz said there was no political bias? That is a an intential mis-reporting of the facts to trick you lemmings.

The evidence clearly points to these guys having a legitimate concern... hence- no criminal referals.

So Biden's son didn't benefit from the firing of the prosecuter, right? Oh ok.

The prosecutor wasn't investigating Bursima at all, and the criminal activity happened before Hunter was hired.

So how did he benefit from the firing again?

Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show
Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show

 

[SweetTea]

Right, Horowitz said he couldn't read somone's mind. The evidence clearly points towards political bias, but he can't say that is why all the mis-steps occurred. Why did the MSM report that Horowitz said there was no political bias? That is a an intential mis-reporting of the facts to trick you lemmings.

The evidence clearly points to these guys having a legitimate concern... hence- no criminal referals.

So Biden's son didn't benefit from the firing of the prosecuter, right? Oh ok.

The prosecutor wasn't investigating Bursima at all, and the criminal activity happened before Hunter was hired.

So how did he benefit from the firing again?

Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show
Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show

Democrats like JoeB are incapble of seeing the truth about Biden or Schiff, etc.

 

[MAGAman]

Biden and Obama said they would hold up the aid if a corrupt prosecutor wasn't removed. Kind of sensible, given that this prosecutor was robbing the country blind.

Trump was extorting the country for his personal gain.

No.. Obama and his pet Biden said they'd hold up blankets until the guy looking into Biden's corrupt company's corruption was fired.

Just when did you think America was supposed to fire prosecutors in other countries?

 

[kyzr]

Right, Horowitz said he couldn't read somone's mind. The evidence clearly points towards political bias, but he can't say that is why all the mis-steps occurred. Why did the MSM report that Horowitz said there was no political bias? That is a an intential mis-reporting of the facts to trick you lemmings.

The evidence clearly points to these guys having a legitimate concern... hence- no criminal referals.

So Biden's son didn't benefit from the firing of the prosecuter, right? Oh ok.

The prosecutor wasn't investigating Bursima at all, and the criminal activity happened before Hunter was hired.

So how did he benefit from the firing again?

Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show
Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show

Democrats like JoeB are incapable of seeing the truth about Biden or Schiff, etc.

Sure they see the truth, but they keep making up lies because the truth shows the democrats what they really are.

 

[JoeB131]

Some of the evidence was tampered with much left out. Sorry.

As usual, you are confused. Burisma was investigated for tax evasion in both 2014 and 2016. Hunter was hired in April of 2014. Try again.

Nope, you need to stop listening to hate radio. Investigations were closed by the time he got there. Not that he had anything to do with that part of the business.

Not sure how the workings of a foreign company half a decade ago suddenly became an issue of national interests. but fine. let's look at Bursima, and at the same time, open a full investigation of all the Trump Organizations dealings in Russia, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

 

[SweetTea]

Some of the evidence was tampered with much left out. Sorry.

As usual, you are confused. Burisma was investigated for tax evasion in both 2014 and 2016. Hunter was hired in April of 2014. Try again.

Nope, you need to stop listening to hate radio. Investigations were closed by the time he got there. Not that he had anything to do with that part of the business.

Not sure how the workings of a foreign company half a decade ago suddenly became an issue of national interests. but fine. let's look at Bursima, and at the same time, open a full investigation of all the Trump Organizations dealings in Russia, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

You are just flat out wrong. The investigatiions were NOT closed. We all know why Hunter Biden was hired. We also all know whey his daddy didn't want any further investigations into the company that was WAY overpaying his son, probably hoping to fund that huge paycheck with some American taxpayer aid.

 

[JoeB131]

You are just flat out wrong. The investigatiions were NOT closed. We all know why Hunter Biden was hired. We also all know whey his daddy didn't want any further investigations into the company that was WAY overpaying his son, probably hoping to fund that huge paycheck with some American taxpayer aid.

Okay, you guys live in your own reality.

The reality that actually exists.
Shokin wasn't investigating anyone.
The EU, IMF and US Government wanted him removed because his prosecutors were caught taking bribes.
Bursima sells natural gas to Europe... they weren't going to run out of money anytime soon.

 

[kyzr]

You are just flat out wrong. The investigatiions were NOT closed. We all know why Hunter Biden was hired. We also all know whey his daddy didn't want any further investigations into the company that was WAY overpaying his son, probably hoping to fund that huge paycheck with some American taxpayer aid.

Okay, you guys live in your own reality.

The reality that actually exists.
Shokin wasn't investigating anyone.
The EU, IMF and US Government wanted him removed because his prosecutors were caught taking bribes.
Bursima sells natural gas to Europe... they weren't going to run out of money anytime soon.

Your phony alibi falls on its face when you look at Lutensko, the prosecutor after Shokin, he didn't prosecute or investigate anyone, especially Burisma.

 

[JoeB131]

Your phony alibi falls on its face when you look at Lutensko, the prosecutor after Shokin, he didn't prosecute or investigate anyone, especially Burisma.

There was nothing to investigate. What Lutsenko did was cover for Manafort and Klimek, Trump's buddies.

In fact, Trump wanted to get Lutensko back in the office to investigate Biden... it was part of the transcript you claim exonerated Trump from wrongdoing.

Yuriy Lutsenko - Wikipedia