After Raising Bail For Rioters, Now DEI Hire Kamala Harris Claims She’s Tough On Crime

[Rawley]

Except she did have a pretty tough record on crime.

Meanwhile, Trump wants to give immunity to that thug cop who shot a woman in the face.

ANd Kamala gave immunity to a cop killer. Let's see who people prefer.

Flashback - Sen. Feinstein Slams then D.A. Kamala Harris for Opposing the Death Penalty for Cop Killer: ‘If I Had Known … I Never Would Have Supported Her’

‘I think this district attorney made a very big mistake’

grabien.com

 

[JoeB131]

J6 was about a rigged election.

Keep spinning

Nope. Trump lost because he ratfucked the economy and covid response.

Nobody wanted him in 2016
Nobody wanted him in 2020
And now that he's got an opponent with a pulse, no one wants him in 2024.

 

[JoeB131]

ANd Kamala gave immunity to a cop killer. Let's see who people prefer.

Flashback - Sen. Feinstein Slams then D.A. Kamala Harris for Opposing the Death Penalty for Cop Killer: ‘If I Had Known … I Never Would Have Supported Her’

‘I think this district attorney made a very big mistake’

grabien.com

She didn't give him immunity, she just didn't go for the Death Penalty.

California hasn't executed anyone in 18 years.

 

[Rawley]

She didn't give him immunity, she just didn't go for the Death Penalty.

California hasn't executed anyone in 18 years.

??? Immunity from the death penalty. She actually did it. Feinstein excoriated her for it. You're whining about some hypothetical about Trump you've made up.

 

[Care4all]

The non profit organization that puts up bail money for those who can not afford the bondsman/bail fees..... is a good cause!

The organization has nothing at all to do with which crimes a Judge requires bail money in order to be released, or how much a judge decides is appropriate as bail for the alleged criminal....

Those decisions are up to the protocol, laws, and a Judge....not the non profit.

What the non profit does is, if the law and judge determines a bail requirement is appropriate for the alleged crime, and a rich Perp can get out of jail awaiting trial with the money for bail costs, then a poor person under the same crime allegation and bail requirements who doesn't easily have those bond fees and bail money cash on hand or available, can apply to this non profit, for them.

I support the cause.

What cause is that?

Bailing looters and arsonists and violent criminals out of jail?

I explained it already, no need to baby step you through it...

 

[Weatherman2020]

Nope. Trump lost because he ratfucked the economy and covid response.

Nobody wanted him in 2016
Nobody wanted him in 2020
And now that he's got an opponent with a pulse, no one wants him in 2024.

Harris has never won a single primary in her life.

And as expected you justify violent riots.

 

[Independent thinker]

How’d that defund the police thingy work out for ya’ll?

Birds fly.

Fish swim.

Water is wet.

Democrats blatantly lie to get elected.

After Raising Bail For Rioters, Harris Claims She's Tough On Crime

Though Kamala Harris is trying to present herself as tough on crime, her record shows that she is only tough when it's politically expedient.

thefederalist.com

She is tough on crime. She wants Trump in jail and only Trump, even for bogus charges. Everyone else can be set free.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Kamala is FULL of SH*T! Just what comes out of her mouth every day.

 

[Weatherman2020]

She is tough on crime. She wants Trump in jail and only Trump, even for bogus charges. Everyone else can be set free.

Democracy must be saved.
So let’s charge political opponents with crimes no one has ever been charged with and violate the US Constitution by keeping opponents off voting ballots.

 

[Weatherman2020]

She didn't give him immunity, she just didn't go for the Death Penalty.

California hasn't executed anyone in 18 years.

Tough on crime Harris gets murderers off death row.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Harris raised bail for non-violent protesters while Trump promises to pardon violent thugs. Please make that a campaign point! I dare ya.

Other than $500 million in property damage, an attempted murder of a LEO and assault on another, it was a peaceful protest!

Watch Minnesota give Trump their electoral votes.

 

[citygator]

Other than $500 million in property damage, an attempted murder of a LEO and assault on another, it was a peaceful protest!

Watch Minnesota give Trump their electoral votes.

Anything is possible but Trump is down by almost 10 there.

KSTP/SurveyUSA poll: Harris takes lead over Trump in first Minnesota poll

Vice President Kamala Harris has a significant lead over former Republican President Donald Trump in Minnesota, 50% to 40%, according to our new KSTP/SurveyUSA poll.

kstp.com

 

[Independent thinker]

Democracy must be saved.
So let’s charge political opponents with crimes no one has ever been charged with and violate the US Constitution by keeping opponents off voting ballots.

I hope Trump & Co don't blow this and Kamala and the dems have at least four more years to further destroy our country and any values we have left. I fear if Kamala wins, it will all be over. The coup of the government will be completed. So, I totally agree with Biden, this election is about the future of our country and democracy is literally at stake. The election is Trump's to lose and I'm afraid he may be capable of doing it.

 

[JoeB131]

??? Immunity from the death penalty. She actually did it. Feinstein excoriated her for it. You're whining about some hypothetical about Trump you've made up.

No, immunity would mean she didn't prosecute at all.
Not seeking the DP in a state that hasn't executed anyone in 18 years seems like a no-brainer.

 

[JoeB131]

Tough on crime Harris gets murderers off death row.

Again, no executions in 18 years. I'm glad she saved money not litigating something that will never happen.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Republicans need to get their story straight

Either Harris is soft on crime or too tough

I guess that would depend on what day of the week it is, Winger! Kamala will pretend to be whatever she thinks will get her votes. Her campaign will tell you to ignore her record because they know that record is WAY too far left to ever get her elected in a nationwide race! What you're seeing right now is someone trying to reinvent themselves because they KNOW that the person they've been is not the person that most Americans want leading their country!

 

[Rawley]

No, immunity would mean she didn't prosecute at all.
Not seeking the DP in a state that hasn't executed anyone in 18 years seems like a no-brainer.

Feinstein disagreed.

 

[JoeB131]

Feinstein disagreed.

So what? Given the fact that CA and most of the country have moved on from Capital Punishment (it is only practiced in the most backward states in the union), it seems Kamala was right and Feinstein was wrong.

 

[Man With A Plan]

So what? Given the fact that CA and most of the country have moved on from Capital Punishment (it is only practiced in the most backward states in the union), it seems Kamala was right and Feinstein was wrong.

So keeping Charles Manson in a cage for decades makes sense to you, Joey? We shouldn't have executed Jeffrey Dahmer and Ted Bundy? That's "backward" thinking to you?

 

[JoeB131]

So keeping Charles Manson in a cage for decades makes sense to you, Joey? We shouldn't have executed Jeffrey Dahmer and Ted Bundy? That's "backward" thinking to you?

Jeff Dahmner wasn't executed, Wisconsin doesn't have a death penalty. He was killed by a fellow inmate.

Manson died a bitter old man in a prison. I'm fine with that.

The problem isn't bundy, it's Cameron Todd Willingham who was innocent, but executed because of faulty evidence and dishonest prosecutors.