After jay jones, democrats have no room to talk.

You mean the Closet Maoist Bisexual ( BHO) and the If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor lie ?
Here's your chance to prove you're smart:

Show us anywhere in the ACA where it makes you change your doctor.


It doesn't. That was something that insurance companies did after the ACA was passed. President Obama did not lie.
 
I love making you all look like the fools that you are.


1762455890785.webp
 
Is it because they're all a bunch of snowflakes?



1762455931975.webp
 
No, not at all!

Simple message of, Dirty tricks, don't always turn out, as planned....

If Rs had released the emails they had and were holding on to during the primary, Jones would not have been the candidate....the Rs could have stopped a candidate who made awful threats like that....

But the threats were obviously not their main concern...

Their main concern was dropping this info they held in their hands, at the last minute, in October, so to give their R candidate a win, at the last minute, by not having enough time for the Democratic party to do anything about it....

That backfired. End of story.

In the old days, October Surprises usually worked....but I think in today's era...October surprises are TOO LATE to impact the vote as they once did because we have a very wide window of Early voting now in October and some states beginning in September....and many votes are already cast before the Surprise, is known by voters.
So Trump’s “***** grab” comment was a National Emergency and disqualifying, but “2 bullets in the head” is acceptable??
 
So Trump’s “***** grab” comment was a National Emergency and disqualifying, but “2 bullets in the head” is acceptable??

Trump actually did it and was convicted over it.
 
Obama knew that people weren't going to be able to keep their doctors. It was built into Obamacare.

Of course, if the plan doesn't meet the requirements. Those were called Junk Policies. Those people would have to leave their junk policy and get an actual ACA-approved policy.

1762466534353.webp



As for the main issue, he didn't say those policies would stay at the same price. He said they could keep them. And they could.

1762466710488.webp



Your link. And BTW, why are you posting from Fake News sites?
 
So Trump’s “***** grab” comment was a National Emergency and disqualifying, but “2 bullets in the head” is acceptable??
It's acceptable in today's Republican Party. I've posted plenty of examples in this thread which show that Republicans don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to condemning violent rhetoric.
 
He wasn't convicted, the jury found in favor of Carroll in a civil suit, based on naught but hearsay and Trump's ignorance of who Carroll was, confusing her with his ex.


But you know that he is guilty of raping E. Jean Carroll. Just like you know he's guilty of all the other sexual assaults he's been accused of. Just like you know he raped young teen girls at Epstein's Manhattan townhouse.
 
15th post
Of course, if the plan doesn't meet the requirements. Those were called Junk Policies. Those people would have to leave their junk policy and get an actual ACA-approved policy.

View attachment 1181587


As for the main issue, he didn't say those policies would stay at the same price. He said they could keep them. And they could.

View attachment 1181588


Your link. And BTW, why are you posting from Fake News sites?


NBC? LOL. What happened in 2010? Democrats got crushed over Obamacare and it's failures.
 
NBC? LOL. What happened in 2010? Democrats got crushed over Obamacare and it's failures.
And this has to do with the contents of the ACA...how?

So obvious whenever you wingnuts lose an argument. You fly off in other directions. I don't get deflected, dude. You're not going to distract me from the facts or the point by waving your arms and shouting "but people hate it!". It's irrelevant to the facts of the bill.

If wingnuts are going to call the Mainstream Media "Fake News" then you cannot use the Fake News to make your points in arguments. Pick a position and stick to it, lest you look like an imbecile.
 
It's acceptable in today's Republican Party. I've posted plenty of examples in this thread which show that Republicans don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to condemning violent rhetoric.
You have any Republicans politicians calling for the execution of their rival?
 
Hold those you disagree with to the same standards as those you do if you didn’t feel this man’s tweets were disqualifying to be elected as the AG fine just apply that same standard when it’s someone you don’t support making such comments. If you only condemn violent rhetoric when it comes from those you disagree with then your showing it’s not the rhetoric you have an issue just who it’s coming from.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom