Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 26,583
- 12,512
- 973
This is the same kind of excuse a child would make.They were just doing what the dem's had done previously....and IAW the COTUS.
Trump’s supporters are hypocrites.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This is the same kind of excuse a child would make.They were just doing what the dem's had done previously....and IAW the COTUS.
The inaccurately labeled insurrection lasted several hours, achieved no effect on established government, was run by citizens, and was a spontaneous rag tag affairThey were just doing what the dem's had done previously....and IAW the COTUS.
If Trump wins the election, that theory goes, Democrats might attempt to disqualify him before electoral votes are counted in January 2025 during the same once-perfunctory process that pro-Trump rioters interrupted when they attacked the US Capitol in 2021.
___________________
“The opinion is unclear on what happens after the election if Trump wins,” said Gerard Magliocca, law professor at Indiana University and one of the nation’s top experts on the ban and who supported Trump’s disqualification.
“At best, it’s unclear,” he said. “And therefore, if Trump wins, people are going to try these things. And it just makes the presidential transition – if Trump wins – more complicated, unpleasant and problematic than it needed to be.”
No excuse......reality.This is the same kind of excuse a child would make.
Trump’s supporters are hypocrites.
An ineffectual insurrection by a bunch of delusional cuckolds is still an insurrection. You don't get a mulligan for trying to rob the bank just because you're shit at it and brought your minivan as the getaway vehicle.The inaccurately labeled insurrection lasted several hours, achieved no effect on established government, was run by citizens, and was a spontaneous rag tag affair
Sorry Snowflake but the Supreme Court just ruled that Congress has the authority to disqualify insurrectionist Trump.Here liberals are suggesting one year in advance that the government be employed against its voting citizens and use government agencies to make it so and not a losely organized handful of citizens
The declaration of that planning is in fact declaratory Insurrection.
Youre making an excuse to avoid the reality of the hypocrisy.No excuse......reality.
Circular talkYoure making an excuse to avoid the reality of the hypocrisy.
Every accusation is a confession.
Scurried Scroat banging the pervert drum againAn ineffectual insurrection by a bunch of delusional cuckolds is still an insurrection. You don't get a mulligan for trying to rob the bank just because you're shit at it and brought your minivan as the getaway vehicle.
Sorry Snowflake but the Supreme Court just ruled that Congress has the authority to disqualify insurrectionist Trump.
Ah, more hypocrisy. Asking me to explain my post when you attack me for doing the same for your posts.Circular talk
Illustrate the details of “reality of hypocrisy”
Other than “they were wrong” what does 9-0 tell you?Ah, more hypocrisy. Asking me to explain my post when you attack me for doing the same for your posts.
I would happily have done so if not for your past behavior.
This has absolutely nothing to do with what I was discussing.Other than “they were wrong” what does 9-0 tell you?
Not if no one has been indicted and/or charged...........or an insurrection has been officially declared by congress and the president.An ineffectual insurrection by a bunch of delusional cuckolds is still an insurrection. You don't get a mulligan for trying to rob the bank just because you're shit at it and brought your minivan as the getaway vehicle.
Sorry Snowflake but the Supreme Court just ruled that Congress has the authority to disqualify insurrectionist Trump.
Other than “they were wrong” what does 9-0 tell you?
The hypocrisy that congressional members were following COTUS guidelines as had been done previously?Youre making an excuse to avoid the reality of the hypocrisy.
It has been by multiple State courts.Not if no one has been indicted and/or charged...........or an insurrection has been officially declared by congress and the president.
Lacking a criminal charge isn't the same as arguing no legal body has determined whether Jan 6th was an insurrection and whether Trump engaged in it because several have.Not by declaring an insurrection 3 1/2 years ago.......without an official charge either.
The guidelines for objecting are part of federal law, not the constitution.The hypocrisy that congressional members were following COTUS guidelines as had been done previously?
OkThis has absolutely nothing to do with what I was discussing.
And I believe 9-0 said states have no business bringing federal charges.It has been by multiple State courts.
Hearsay charges aren't constitutional. Indictments and due process are.Lacking a criminal charge isn't the same as arguing no legal body has determined whether Jan 6th was an insurrection and whether Trump engaged in it because several have.
He referenced it as a mental insurrection or intent of suchNot if no one has been indicted and/or charged...........or an insurrection has been officially declared by congress and the president.
Not by declaring an insurrection 3 1/2 years ago.......without an official charge either.
The guidelines for objecting are part of federal law, not the constitution.
It’s hypocritical for a conservative to be attacking Raskin for wanting to set up a procedure to enforce the 14th amendment, which has been done for and consistent with guidelines from the constitution.
Huh? How so?You're so radicalized, you're far to the left of even the most extremist justices like Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson.