After 9-0 SCOTUS rejection, Democrats devise Putinesque new plan to keep Trump off the ballot

[whitehall]

Democrats get a free ride for every idiotic treasonous plan that they come up with. In Maine the official state policy was to "suppress" votes for Trump. They actually used the word "suppress" and it didn't bother the media a bit.

 

[WEATHER53]

There was no "witch hunt". He was charged because he is corrupt. He brought all of it on himself..because he's corrupt.
If we were charged, there would have been no drawing this out....we'd be gone and awaiting trial. Not running for President.

0-9 and you guys think we are in denial about the certainty of the next upcoming Guaranteed Got Him Now
Cried wolf 50 times, no one paying attention other than your co-loons.

 

[MagicMike]

9-0

Donald Trump's Debt: Live Counter

Track Donald Trump's debt as it increases with interest with this second-by-second counter; monitored by an accountant to ensure accuracy.

trumpdebtcounter.com

 

[MagicMike]

Democrats get a free ride for every idiotic treasonous plan that they come up with. In Maine the official state policy was to "suppress" votes for Trump. They actually used the word "suppress" and it didn't bother the media a bit.

Suppressing the vote for a treasonous insurrectionist enemy of our nation is a very patriotic thing to do.
Why do you MAGAt snowflakes hate your country?

 

[Concerned American]

You didn’t pay attention. I’m accurate and you’re in denial.

LMAO, 9-0! It is clear who is in denial.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

0-9 and you guys think we are in denial about the certainty of the next upcoming Guaranteed Got Him Now
Cried wolf 50 times, no one paying attention other than your co-loons.

Honestly, who is 0 for 9?
No trial has started yet.
He's already relieved of almost 550 million dollars. Some of that may be reduced but he'll still have to pay a good share of that.

91 counts over 4 indictments. What is it that you aren't getting here. They got him. It's just a matter of how badly he's going to pay.
He isn't going to win in November, so that won't protect him. And he can't stall forever.

 

[Concerned American]

Suppressing the vote for a treasonous insurrectionist enemy of our nation is a very patriotic thing to do.
Why do you MAGAt snowflakes hate your country?

Nine to Nothing, BIPARTISAN decision by the SCOTUS. There was only an insurrection in your pin head.

 

[MagicMike]

Participation trophy pussies feel that’s a tie

Participation pussies are people who thought Trump should stay in office even though he got trounced in the election.

 

[Crepitus]

It doesn't sound like the DemoKKKrats are very confident in Poor Memory's ability to win this one without a whole lot of election interference...LOL

The court said congress had to do.

I thought you greed with their ruling?

 

[MagicMike]

Nine to Nothing, BIPARTISAN decision by the SCOTUS. There was only an insurrection in your pin head.

Wrong.
Absolving him of insurrection was not in SCOTUS' language yesterday.
Instead they left it up to Congress to determine it, and both houses of Congress already have.

 

[Independent thinker]

It doesn't sound like the DemoKKKrats are very confident in Poor Memory's ability to win this one without a whole lot of election interference...LOL

LOL. He means the Democratic House impeached Trump for insurrection. Guess he forgot the Senate did not convict.

 

[Concerned American]

Absolving him of insurrection

When was he ever charged with insurrection, moron? In order to be absolved, you must be charged with something. Glad I could clear that up for you. Insurrenction is a big word that has taken root in your little head.

 

[Concerned American]

both houses of Congress already have.

Please link to anything in the congressional record that has determined that an insurrection occurred. While you are at it, link to anyone who has been charged with insurrection.

 

[TheYellowKing]

The court said congress had to do.

I thought you greed with their ruling?

So now you all agree Congress is the only one that can charge him with an insurrection before it was nah they don't

Make up your loser minds

 

[Seymour Flops]

OK. My bad. I realize now that I have to be more specific for you less-than-bright members of Alt-Right Nation.
I will revise my question.

Is he currently sitting in jail or confined to Mar-A-Lago with his passports confiscated and wearing an ankle monitor awaiting his right to a speedy trial(s).
Because that's EXACTLY where you or I would be sitting if we were charged with the same counts....minus the cushy palace to be confined to house arrest.

Hint..he's not. He's walking around free to move his yap.....so, there;s that.

As you seem to acknowledge, you asked whether Donald Trump “has been arrested?” He has, whereas I for example, have not.

If you have another question about him being currently incarcerated, no he is not. Only because we still have due process in this country, however inconvenient you may find that.

 

[WEATHER53]

Honestly, who is 0 for 9?
No trial has started yet.
He's already relieved of almost 550 million dollars. Some of that may be reduced but he'll still have to pay a good share of that.

91 counts over 4 indictments. What is it that you aren't getting here. They got him. It's just a matter of how badly he's going to pay.
He isn't going to win in November, so that won't protect him. And he can't stall forever.

We thinkers know you non competing, always disqualification seeking lib loons don’t comprehend the distinction between 9-0 versus 0-9.

 

[Rawley]

Not exactly. The ruling says only the Congress can disqualify someone from running for Federal office.

McConnell was still correct in that the courts have to charge someone with the crime. That's what Jack Smith is trying to do.

The Congress is not vested with the power to charge criminal offenses. If Trump is convicted of insurrection, the Congress can disqualify him or reinstate him under 14-3

The way I read it, if Trump was charged and convicted under 18 U. S. C. §2383 for insurrection, states could remove him from the ballot. Congress acted under section 5 and provided the enforcement mechanism in the form of the criminal statute.

 

[marvin martian]

Please link to anything in the congressional record that has determined that an insurrection occurred. While you are at it, link to anyone who has been charged with insurrection.

Way to get rid of him! Thanks!

 

[para bellum]

The way I read it, if Trump was charged and convicted under 18 U. S. C. §2383 for insurrection, states could remove him from the ballot. Congress acted under section 5 and provided the enforcement mechanism in the form of the criminal statute.

Yes. The States have no power to enforce 14-3. None.

18 USC 2383 bars someone who is convicted from holding any office.

States do not need to rely on 14-3, the statute gives them the all authority they need.

 

[Flash]

It doesn't sound like the DemoKKKrats are very confident in Poor Memory's ability to win this one without a whole lot of election interference...LOL

Democrats are the scum of America