Not this particular thing, no, but the ACLU has always made a point of taking up one or two "conservative" causes so that gullible tweekos like Dogbert can prance around, chortling about how the ACLU isn't really leftist.
Noticeably, their idea of a "conservative cause" generally involves people behaving in a nasty and uncivilized fashion.
Well aren't we glad to have phony psychics like you who can determine when the ACLU is really sincere or just trying to save their image.
It doesn't require psychic powers, dumbass. It just requires the ability to read.
Stephen Baldwin, laying down ACLU policy (and if you have to ask me who Stephen Baldwin is, you should just shut the hell up right now): "If I aid the reactionaries to get free speech now and then, if I go outside the class struggle to fight against censorship, it is only because those liberties help to create a more hospitable atmosphere for working class liberties." In other words, as paraphrased by biographer William Donohue, who conducted extensive interviews with Baldwin before his death, "The occasional defense of right-wing extremists opens up the courts, thereby making it easier for the ACLU to defend its ideological kinfolk on the left."
What? You thought the ACLU was all about lofty, altruistic ideals?