ACLU asks judge to force the Trump administration to state under oath if it violated his court order

Apparently he speaks for the a larger number of voters than you. LOL
Not anymore. The buyer's remorse among Trump voters has started and is already leading to a revolt.
Check out Republican town hall meetings all over the country.
Trump and his boss Elon have already lost whatever "mandate" they thought they had.
 
Not anymore. The buyer's remorse among Trump voters has started
Keep telling yourself that. Reality says your wrong.
Check out Republican town hall meetings all over the country.
Yeah, the loudmouthed, paid democrat shills are showing their butts. That is for sure. But the American electorate is smarter than that and they've already been dealt with in my AO. One female democrat loudmouth ran it until she was forcibly removed in north ID, another in a solid blue eastern WA republican townhall showed her stupidity for the world to see on the evening news. You folks lose voters every time you act like petulant children. Democrats have pushed the envelope and they are on their last legs and that is coming from a 40 year democrat that realized the democrats are not Americans. They have become a globalist party and I AM AN AMERICAN.
 
"Plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed to halt deportations under a rarely-used 18th century wartime law invoked by President Donald Trump asked a federal judge Monday to force officials to explain under oath whether they violated his court order by removing more than 200 people from the country after it was issued and celebrating it on social media.

The motion marks another escalation in the battle over Trump’s aggressive opening moves in his second term, several of which have been temporarily halted by judges. Trump’s allies have raged over the holds and suggested he does not have to obey them, and some plaintiffs have said it appears the administration is flouting court orders.

On Saturday night, District Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the administration not to deport anyone in its custody over the newly-invoked Alien Enemies Act, which has only been used three times before in U.S. history, all during congressionally-declared wars. Trump issued a proclamation that the 1798 law was newly in effect due to what he claimed was an invasion by the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua.

Trump’s invocation of the act could allow him to deport any noncitizen he says is associated with the gang, without offering proof or even publicly identifying them. The plaintiffs filed their suit on behalf of several Venezuelans in U.S. custody who feared they’d be falsely accused of being Tren de Aragua members and improperly removed from the country.'


The only way to confront tyranny is with facts and the truth.
The judge has no jurisdiction so fuck him. That's like a New York judge presiding over a gun case in North Carolina.
 
The judge has no jurisdiction so fuck him. That's like a New York judge presiding over a gun case in North Carolina.
Wrong. Federal judges have jurisdiction over any federal matter. Their "jurisdiction" is in effect the entire nation.
 
"Plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed to halt deportations under a rarely-used 18th century wartime law invoked by President Donald Trump asked a federal judge Monday to force officials to explain under oath whether they violated his court order by removing more than 200 people from the country after it was issued and celebrating it on social media.

The motion marks another escalation in the battle over Trump’s aggressive opening moves in his second term, several of which have been temporarily halted by judges. Trump’s allies have raged over the holds and suggested he does not have to obey them, and some plaintiffs have said it appears the administration is flouting court orders.

On Saturday night, District Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the administration not to deport anyone in its custody over the newly-invoked Alien Enemies Act, which has only been used three times before in U.S. history, all during congressionally-declared wars. Trump issued a proclamation that the 1798 law was newly in effect due to what he claimed was an invasion by the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua.

Trump’s invocation of the act could allow him to deport any noncitizen he says is associated with the gang, without offering proof or even publicly identifying them. The plaintiffs filed their suit on behalf of several Venezuelans in U.S. custody who feared they’d be falsely accused of being Tren de Aragua members and improperly removed from the country.'


The only way to confront tyranny is with facts and the truth.
Judges cannot order the President from exercising his executive powers.

Go pound sand, commie.
 
Judges cannot order the President from exercising his executive powers.

Go pound sand, commie.
Actually in Communist systems there are no checks and balances on power in government.
It appears you oppose the idea of another COEQUAL branch of our government doing its duty and serving as a (constitutionally appointed) CHECK AND BALANCE on Trump's executive power.
That would make you uh......more of a "commie" than a U.S. patriot.
Vlad Putin would be proud of you.
He's a commie too and just like you he doesn't believe anybody should be allowed to check his power either.

 
Actually in Communist systems there are no checks and balances on power in government.
It appears you oppose the idea of another COEQUAL branch of our government doing its duty and serving as a (constitutionally appointed) CHECK AND BALANCE on Trump's executive power.
That would make you uh......more of a "commie" than a U.S. patriot.
Vlad Putin would be proud of you.
He's a commie too and just like you he doesn't believe anybody should be allowed to check his power either.
District courts have no constitutional authority, they rule in their districts.
Only the Supreme Court has co-equal authority for checks & balance
The supremes told the district judge to file in the right district and not to infringe on presidential authority.
 
Actually in Communist systems there are no checks and balances on power in government.
It appears you oppose the idea of another COEQUAL branch of our government doing its duty and serving as a (constitutionally appointed) CHECK AND BALANCE on Trump's executive power.
That would make you uh......more of a "commie" than a U.S. patriot.
Vlad Putin would be proud of you.
He's a commie too and just like you he doesn't believe anybody should be allowed to check his power either.


The check was the American people electing him.

If he was doing something illegal, then yes the courts can stop it.

Like when the courts ruled Biden’s Vax mandate was illegal.

Deporting illegals is what the executive branch is supposed to do.
 
The check was the American people electing him.
Better re read your U.S. Constitution......because what you've just said isn't anywhere in there simp.
If he was doing something illegal, then yes the courts can stop it.
He HAS done something illegal, which yes, is why the court stopped him.
Like when the courts ruled Biden’s Vax mandate was illegal.
Not even germaine to this conversation.
Irrelevant as fuck.
Deporting illegals is what the executive branch is supposed to do.
Actually upholding his oath of office is what the POTUS and all the rest of The Executive Branch is supposed to do.
Habeus Corpus and due process rights (for ALL PEOPLE, "legal" and "illegal" alike. FULL STOP. No caveats) are enshrined in that document.
Once Trump wipes his ass with that document, then appeals a lower federal court ruling to The SCOTUS and gets shot down 9-0.....then throws the bird to even that ruling......he has blatantly violated his oath of office and is DARING everyone to do something about it.
In short he is definitely NOT "doing what he is supposed to do.
At this point either The 25th Amendment or impeachment in The House followed by conviction in The Senate are the only remedies
 
Better re read your U.S. Constitution......because what you've just said isn't anywhere in there simp.

He HAS done something illegal, which yes, is why the court stopped him.

Not even germaine to this conversation.
Irrelevant as fuck.

Actually upholding his oath of office is what the POTUS and all the rest of The Executive Branch is supposed to do.
Habeus Corpus and due process rights (for ALL PEOPLE, "legal" and "illegal" alike. FULL STOP. No caveats) are enshrined in that document.
Once Trump wipes his ass with that document, then appeals a lower federal court ruling to The SCOTUS and gets shot down 9-0.....then throws the bird to even that ruling......he has blatantly violated his oath of office and is DARING everyone to do something about it.
In short he is definitely NOT "doing what he is supposed to do.
At this point either The 25th Amendment or impeachment in The House followed by conviction in The Senate are the only remedies
SCOTUS did not rule 9-0 to bring the criminal back.

Learn to read.
 
The SCOTUS ruled 9-0 ordering Trump to facilitate the mans return.
Which means nothing. If he is returned, he’d be “facilitated” by being arrested again, and deported again.
 
Back
Top Bottom