ACLU asks judge to force the Trump administration to state under oath if it violated his court order

[Moonglow]

Literal definition of “due process” is that process which is due.

Even a tuna sandwich has a done did due process.

 

[Zincwarrior]

He isn't. He exercising his power as president. Deporting illegal aliens is one of those powers.

Yet he must follow established criminal rights. I wonder if this will be appealed upwards.

 

[BackAgain]

Even a tuna sandwich has a done did due process.

Actually, no. It doesn’t.

 

[Leo123]

"Plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed to halt deportations under a rarely-used 18th century wartime law invoked by President Donald Trump asked a federal judge Monday to force officials to explain under oath whether they violated his court order by removing more than 200 people from the country after it was issued and celebrating it on social media.

The motion marks another escalation in the battle over Trump’s aggressive opening moves in his second term, several of which have been temporarily halted by judges. Trump’s allies have raged over the holds and suggested he does not have to obey them, and some plaintiffs have said it appears the administration is flouting court orders.

On Saturday night, District Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the administration not to deport anyone in its custody over the newly-invoked Alien Enemies Act, which has only been used three times before in U.S. history, all during congressionally-declared wars. Trump issued a proclamation that the 1798 law was newly in effect due to what he claimed was an invasion by the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua.

Trump’s invocation of the act could allow him to deport any noncitizen he says is associated with the gang, without offering proof or even publicly identifying them. The plaintiffs filed their suit on behalf of several Venezuelans in U.S. custody who feared they’d be falsely accused of being Tren de Aragua members and improperly removed from the country.'

Judge questions Trump administration on whether it ignored order to turn around deportation flights

A federal judge on Monday was incredulous at the contention by the Trump administration that his directive to turn around deportation flights wasn't binding because it was made verbally.

apnews.com

The only way to confront tyranny is with facts and the truth.

You posted:
"Plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed to halt deportations under a rarely-used 18th century wartime law"

You mean like Democrats did invoking the centuries old Espionage Act they used on Trump? Payback is a bitch isn't it?

 

[Rambunctious]

"Plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed to halt deportations under a rarely-used 18th century wartime law invoked by President Donald Trump asked a federal judge Monday to force officials to explain under oath whether they violated his court order by removing more than 200 people from the country after it was issued and celebrating it on social media.

The motion marks another escalation in the battle over Trump’s aggressive opening moves in his second term, several of which have been temporarily halted by judges. Trump’s allies have raged over the holds and suggested he does not have to obey them, and some plaintiffs have said it appears the administration is flouting court orders.

On Saturday night, District Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the administration not to deport anyone in its custody over the newly-invoked Alien Enemies Act, which has only been used three times before in U.S. history, all during congressionally-declared wars. Trump issued a proclamation that the 1798 law was newly in effect due to what he claimed was an invasion by the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua.

Trump’s invocation of the act could allow him to deport any noncitizen he says is associated with the gang, without offering proof or even publicly identifying them. The plaintiffs filed their suit on behalf of several Venezuelans in U.S. custody who feared they’d be falsely accused of being Tren de Aragua members and improperly removed from the country.'

Judge questions Trump administration on whether it ignored order to turn around deportation flights

A federal judge on Monday was incredulous at the contention by the Trump administration that his directive to turn around deportation flights wasn't binding because it was made verbally.

apnews.com

The only way to confront tyranny is with facts and the truth.

The demand that the deportees be returned was not in writing in the order... he gave a verbal order after he learned the planes took off.... so too bad fo da judge....
And now we will impeach his ass....

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Yet he must follow established criminal rights. I wonder if this will be appealed upwards.

What rights have been violated?

 

[Crepitus]

when I didn't commit one.

Except that they did.

 

[Crepitus]

What rights have been violated?

Due process.

DERP!!!

 

[Crepitus]

This sort of stuff just keeps causing the voting public to hate Democrats even more. 90% of the people want these South American gangs out of the United States or at Guantanamo Bay. Yet, here are Democrats siding with the gangs. Tells you a lot about the belief system of Democrats that they are cultists who love death and destruction over a civil society. Trump is fighting this and he will win.

Prove those people were from a gang.

I'll wait.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Due process.

DERP!!!

Due process only applies when someone is being deprived of life, liberty and property. Illegal aliens aren't being imprisoned, they're being sent home.

 

[Crepitus]

Due process is more American than Elon Musk.

By FAR.

 

[Zincwarrior]

What rights have been violated?

I don't have a clue. The judge did.

 

[Crepitus]

does any of this apply to non-citizens

yes.

 

[Crepitus]

I foresee the MAGA Admin will now ignore and judges it doesn't like. History will remember when we crossed the Rubicon.

Yeah, wherever the historians live after the USA falls.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Due process only applies when someone is being deprived of life, liberty and property. Illegal aliens aren't being imprisoned, they're being sent home.

All persons in US territory have due process rights. Even you.

Thats why Gitmo was opened: not US territory.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

I don't have a clue. The judge did.

No rights were violated. The judge is trying to legislate from the bench.

 

[Crepitus]

If this admin can ignore the courts the next can as well.

But they won't. How much did Joe use his unlimited power granted by SC(r)OTUS?

 

[Crepitus]

Such as the last admin?

That did not happen.

 

[Zincwarrior]

No rights were violated. The judge is trying to legislate from the bench.

Yes you are definitely saying that. Thats why the admin would have had to appeal it.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

All persons in US territory have due process rights. Even you.

Thats why Gitmo was opened: not US territory.

Anyone that's being prosecuted for a crime and is facing prison time, yes. Illegal aliens aren't going to prison. They're being sent home. They have no right to come to The United States.