ACLU asks judge to force the Trump administration to state under oath if it violated his court order

[Zincwarrior]

Yes, non-citizens in the United States, including undocumented immigrants, are entitled to due process rights, meaning they cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• Constitutional Protections:
  The U.S. Constitution's protections, including due process and equal protection, apply to all individuals, regardless of their immigration status.
  
  
• Due Process Clause:
  The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments contain the Due Process Clause, which states that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
  
  
• • Examples of Due Process Rights:
    • • Notice of Charges: Non-citizens have the right to be informed of the charges against them.
      • Right to a Hearing: They have the right to a fair hearing before an immigration judge, with some exceptions for expedited removal proceedings.
      • Right to Counsel: They have the right to an attorney to represent them.
      • Right to Present Evidence: They have the right to present evidence in their defense.
  • Expedited Removal:
    While certain situations may allow for expedited removal without a formal hearing, asylum seekers, for example, must still be given a chance to present their case before an immigration judge.
  • Legal Status Doesn't Matter:
    A person's lack of legal status does not preclude them from filing suit or defending themselves and their property without due process of the law.

I foresee the MAGA Admin will now ignore and judges it doesn't like. History will remember when we crossed the Rubicon.

 

[jotathought]

Americans to the ACLU: Go. Fuck. Yourself.

More like Why don't you go outside and play hide and go fuck yourself?

 

[Zincwarrior]

More like Why don't you go outside and play hide and go fuck yourself?

If this admin can ignore the courts the next can as well.

 

[jotathought]

If this admin can ignore the courts the next can as well.

Such as the last admin?

 

[Moonglow]

I foresee the MAGA Admin will now ignore and judges it doesn't like. History will remember when we crossed the Rubicon.

Andrew Jackson did the same thing and taunted the judges by claiming they would not force him to do it by their hand.

 

[excalibur]

 

[Moonglow]

Such as the last admin?

Did you agree with Biden and the EPA?

 

[Moonglow]

President do not have line item veto power and funds allocated by Congress are by law to be used as intended.

 

[jotathought]

Did you agree with Biden and the EPA?

I don't agree with most of Biden .. or Harris

 

[WorldWatcher]

Such as the last admin?

Do you have an example from the last admin?

Psst the student loan process isn’t one as the Biden administration stopped using the program where the SCOTUS said they exceeded their authority.

The SCOTUS decision was about that law, not other authorized processes, such as PSLF.

WW

 

[Zincwarrior]

Such as the last admin?

Each new wrong is added to the balance until the scale is broken.

 

[Moonglow]

I don't agree with most of Biden .. or Harris

Then you don't agree with Trump doing it also. Harris was not the president.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

"Plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed to halt deportations under a rarely-used 18th century wartime law invoked by President Donald Trump asked a federal judge Monday to force officials to explain under oath whether they violated his court order by removing more than 200 people from the country after it was issued and celebrating it on social media.

The motion marks another escalation in the battle over Trump’s aggressive opening moves in his second term, several of which have been temporarily halted by judges. Trump’s allies have raged over the holds and suggested he does not have to obey them, and some plaintiffs have said it appears the administration is flouting court orders.

On Saturday night, District Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the administration not to deport anyone in its custody over the newly-invoked Alien Enemies Act, which has only been used three times before in U.S. history, all during congressionally-declared wars. Trump issued a proclamation that the 1798 law was newly in effect due to what he claimed was an invasion by the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua.

Trump’s invocation of the act could allow him to deport any noncitizen he says is associated with the gang, without offering proof or even publicly identifying them. The plaintiffs filed their suit on behalf of several Venezuelans in U.S. custody who feared they’d be falsely accused of being Tren de Aragua members and improperly removed from the country.'

Judge questions Trump administration on whether it ignored order to turn around deportation flights

A federal judge on Monday was incredulous at the contention by the Trump administration that his directive to turn around deportation flights wasn't binding because it was made verbally.

apnews.com

The only way to confront tyranny is with facts and the truth.

The sad part is, you don't have a clue why the judge cannot do that...lol

 

[Cougarbear]

Yes, non-citizens in the United States, including undocumented immigrants, are entitled to due process rights, meaning they cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• Constitutional Protections:
  The U.S. Constitution's protections, including due process and equal protection, apply to all individuals, regardless of their immigration status.
  
  
• Due Process Clause:
  The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments contain the Due Process Clause, which states that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
  
  
• • Examples of Due Process Rights:
    • • Notice of Charges: Non-citizens have the right to be informed of the charges against them.
      • Right to a Hearing: They have the right to a fair hearing before an immigration judge, with some exceptions for expedited removal proceedings.
      • Right to Counsel: They have the right to an attorney to represent them.
      • Right to Present Evidence: They have the right to present evidence in their defense.
  • Expedited Removal:
    While certain situations may allow for expedited removal without a formal hearing, asylum seekers, for example, must still be given a chance to present their case before an immigration judge.
  • Legal Status Doesn't Matter:
    A person's lack of legal status does not preclude them from filing suit or defending themselves and their property without due process of the law.

• Right to a Hearing: They have the right to a fair hearing before an immigration judge, with some exceptions for expedited removal proceedings.
• Expedited Removal:
  While certain situations may allow for expedited removal without a formal hearing, asylum seekers, for example, must still be given a chance to present their case before an immigration judge.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

I foresee the MAGA Admin will now ignore and judges it doesn't like. History will remember when we crossed the Rubicon.

Judges aren't kings. They cannot rule by decree.

 

[toobfreak]

Too funny.

Who saw Clayhead Jonesy becoming such a whiny bad loser?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Judges aren't kings. They cannot rule by decree.

Neither can Trump.

 

[BackAgain]

Due process is more American than Elon Musk.

Literal definition of “due process” is that process which is due.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Do you have an example from the last admin?

Psst the student loan process isn’t one as the Biden administration stopped using the program where the SCOTUS said they exceeded their authority.

The SCOTUS decision was about that law, not other authorized processes, such as PSLF.

WW

That ain't what Biden said...

The Supreme Court blocked it, but that didn’t stop me.” - Joe Biden

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Neither can Trump.

He isn't. He exercising his power as president. Deporting illegal aliens is one of those powers.