ACLU asks judge to force the Trump administration to state under oath if it violated his court order

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed to halt deportations under a rarely-used 18th century wartime law invoked by President Donald Trump asked a federal judge Monday to force officials to explain under oath whether they violated his court order by removing more than 200 people from the country after it was issued and celebrating it on social media.

The motion marks another escalation in the battle over Trump’s aggressive opening moves in his second term, several of which have been temporarily halted by judges. Trump’s allies have raged over the holds and suggested he does not have to obey them, and some plaintiffs have said it appears the administration is flouting court orders.

On Saturday night, District Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the administration not to deport anyone in its custody over the newly-invoked Alien Enemies Act, which has only been used three times before in U.S. history, all during congressionally-declared wars. Trump issued a proclamation that the 1798 law was newly in effect due to what he claimed was an invasion by the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua.

Trump’s invocation of the act could allow him to deport any noncitizen he says is associated with the gang, without offering proof or even publicly identifying them. The plaintiffs filed their suit on behalf of several Venezuelans in U.S. custody who feared they’d be falsely accused of being Tren de Aragua members and improperly removed from the country.'

Judge questions Trump administration on whether it ignored order to turn around deportation flights

A federal judge on Monday was incredulous at the contention by the Trump administration that his directive to turn around deportation flights wasn't binding because it was made verbally.

apnews.com

The only way to confront tyranny is with facts and the truth.

 

[excalibur]

Too funny.

 

[WEATHER53]

More one leaf on the branch of a tree pretending it’s the whole branch and boss of the entire tree

 

[Orangecat]

Americans to the ACLU: Go. Fuck. Yourself.

 

[Darkwind]

So, Trump administration.

Under oath? yeah, let Me cop to a crime under oath even when I didn't commit one.

The ACLU has been overrun by the insane.

 

[WEATHER53]

It’s ALL non competitive sore losers

 

[Cougarbear]

"Plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed to halt deportations under a rarely-used 18th century wartime law invoked by President Donald Trump asked a federal judge Monday to force officials to explain under oath whether they violated his court order by removing more than 200 people from the country after it was issued and celebrating it on social media.

The motion marks another escalation in the battle over Trump’s aggressive opening moves in his second term, several of which have been temporarily halted by judges. Trump’s allies have raged over the holds and suggested he does not have to obey them, and some plaintiffs have said it appears the administration is flouting court orders.

On Saturday night, District Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the administration not to deport anyone in its custody over the newly-invoked Alien Enemies Act, which has only been used three times before in U.S. history, all during congressionally-declared wars. Trump issued a proclamation that the 1798 law was newly in effect due to what he claimed was an invasion by the Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua.

Trump’s invocation of the act could allow him to deport any noncitizen he says is associated with the gang, without offering proof or even publicly identifying them. The plaintiffs filed their suit on behalf of several Venezuelans in U.S. custody who feared they’d be falsely accused of being Tren de Aragua members and improperly removed from the country.'

Judge questions Trump administration on whether it ignored order to turn around deportation flights

A federal judge on Monday was incredulous at the contention by the Trump administration that his directive to turn around deportation flights wasn't binding because it was made verbally.

apnews.com

The only way to confront tyranny is with facts and the truth.

This sort of stuff just keeps causing the voting public to hate Democrats even more. 90% of the people want these South American gangs out of the United States or at Guantanamo Bay. Yet, here are Democrats siding with the gangs. Tells you a lot about the belief system of Democrats that they are cultists who love death and destruction over a civil society. Trump is fighting this and he will win.

 

[Moonglow]

Too funny.

You forgot to laugh..again...

 

[1srelluc]

Please dems, never change.

We have you teetering on the edge and the funny part is you are gonna push yourselves over it.

 

[Moonglow]

This sort of stuff just keeps causing the voting public to hate Democrats even more. 90% of the people want these South American gangs out of the United States or at Guantanamo Bay. Yet, here are Democrats siding with the gangs. Tells you a lot about the belief system of Democrats that they are cultists who love death and destruction over a civil society. Trump is fighting this and he will win.

Due process is more American than Elon Musk.

 

[Moonglow]

Please dems, never change.

We have you teetering on the edge and the funny part is you are gonna push yourselves over it.

I can tell you love lawless law, until it's shoved up yer arse.

 

[Invisibleflash]

I can tell you love lawless law, until it's shoved up yer arse.

 

[Cougarbear]

Due process is more American than Elon Musk.

What does one have to do with the other? Laws are written and then given to the various departments of the Executive branch to exercise them out. In other words, make the regulations that coincided with the law including the penalties for violations of the regulations. Musk is simply applying the laws already on the books to reduce the size and spending of Government. Obama gave Biden the job during Obama's administration. The DOGE of Obama. Did the size and spending decrease? NOPE! Dems are just mad that Trump is succeeding where they failed. The people obviously want this as the popularity of Democrats is at an all time low while Trump is at an all time high.

 

[Moonglow]

View attachment 1090529

I stand up to fascist trash.

 

[Moonglow]

What does one have to do with the other? Laws are written and then given to the various departments of the Executive branch to exercise them out. In other words, make the regulations that coincided with the law including the penalties for violations of the regulations. Musk is simply applying the laws already on the books to reduce the size and spending of Government. Obama gave Biden the job during Obama's administration. The DOGE of Obama. Did the size and spending decrease? NOPE! Dems are just mad that Trump is succeeding where they failed. The people obviously want this as the popularity of Democrats is at an all time low while Trump is at an all time high.

You missed the point my dear, the law says that one must have due process in the USA,

Yes, the U.S. Constitution guarantees that no one can be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, as stated in both the Fifth Amendment (regarding the federal government) and the Fourteenth Amendment (regarding state governments).

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• Due Process Clause:
  The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments contain a "Due Process Clause" that states, "nor shall any person... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law".
  
  
• Federal vs. State:
  The Fifth Amendment applies to the federal government, while the Fourteenth Amendment applies to the states.
  
  
• Procedural Due Process:
  This aspect of due process ensures that government actions that could deprive someone of life, liberty, or property must be carried out fairly and according to established procedures.
  
  
• Substantive Due Process:
  This aspect protects certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if fair procedures are followed.
  • Right to be heard: Individuals have the right to present their case and be heard before being deprived of life, liberty, or property.
    
    
  • Notice of charges: Individuals must be informed of the charges against them.
    
    
  • Right to counsel: Individuals have the right to legal representation.
    
    
  • Right to a fair trial: Individuals have the right to a fair and impartial trial.
• Importance of Due Process:
  Due process is a cornerstone of the American legal system, ensuring that the government acts fairly and justly.

 

[Moonglow]

Elon Musk is just a piece of shit.

 

[WEATHER53]

The USA has its policies that confer snd benefit US citizens . We are not The International PR Agency for the planet.

 

[Cougarbear]

You missed the point my dear, the law says that one must have due process in the USA,

Yes, the U.S. Constitution guarantees that no one can be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, as stated in both the Fifth Amendment (regarding the federal government) and the Fourteenth Amendment (regarding state governments).

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• Due Process Clause:
  The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments contain a "Due Process Clause" that states, "nor shall any person... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law".
  
  
• Federal vs. State:
  The Fifth Amendment applies to the federal government, while the Fourteenth Amendment applies to the states.
  
  
• Procedural Due Process:
  This aspect of due process ensures that government actions that could deprive someone of life, liberty, or property must be carried out fairly and according to established procedures.
  
  
• Substantive Due Process:
  This aspect protects certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if fair procedures are followed.
  • Right to be heard: Individuals have the right to present their case and be heard before being deprived of life, liberty, or property.
    
    
  • Notice of charges: Individuals must be informed of the charges against them.
    
    
  • Right to counsel: Individuals have the right to legal representation.
    
    
  • Right to a fair trial: Individuals have the right to a fair and impartial trial.
• Importance of Due Process:
  Due process is a cornerstone of the American legal system, ensuring that the government acts fairly and justly.

The question is, does any of this apply to non-citizens or those aliens who have had their green cards taken from them? It's hillarious how you defend gangs that kill, torture and traffic women and children. The law says that those who violate their green card agreements can have their legal status revoked. It doesn't take a court hearing to do that and is constitutional. Ruthless gangs that came here illegally to start with do not have the rights you are stating here.

 

[Moonglow]

The question is, does any of this apply to non-citizens or those aliens who have had their green cards taken from them? It's hillarious how you defend gangs that kill, torture and traffic women and children. The law says that those who violate their green card agreements can have their legal status revoked. It doesn't take a court hearing to do that and is constitutional. Ruthless gangs that came here illegally to start with do not have the rights you are stating here.

Yes, non-citizens in the United States, including undocumented immigrants, are entitled to due process rights, meaning they cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• Constitutional Protections:
  The U.S. Constitution's protections, including due process and equal protection, apply to all individuals, regardless of their immigration status.
  
  
• Due Process Clause:
  The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments contain the Due Process Clause, which states that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
  
  
• • Examples of Due Process Rights:
    • • Notice of Charges: Non-citizens have the right to be informed of the charges against them.
        
      • Right to a Hearing: They have the right to a fair hearing before an immigration judge, with some exceptions for expedited removal proceedings.
        
      • Right to Counsel: They have the right to an attorney to represent them.
        
      • Right to Present Evidence: They have the right to present evidence in their defense.
        
  • Expedited Removal:
    While certain situations may allow for expedited removal without a formal hearing, asylum seekers, for example, must still be given a chance to present their case before an immigration judge.
    
  • Legal Status Doesn't Matter:
    A person's lack of legal status does not preclude them from filing suit or defending themselves and their property without due process of the law.

 

[22lcidw]

I stand up to fascist trash.

You stand up to the other party you do not like. So, everything they do can be questioned.