Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 14,975
- 3,031
- 290
Nope. Straight up legal fact. No way around it.No, it's your interpretation, what matters is the courts interpretation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope. Straight up legal fact. No way around it.No, it's your interpretation, what matters is the courts interpretation.
The UN and ICJ disagree with what you're saying though, so you are clearly wrong and that flawed reasoning likely extends to many other things you claim are true here.Nope. Straight up legal fact. No way around it.
That's disparaging right there, as disparaging as people arguing that the Jews are responsible for the millions exterminated in WW2, that they brought it on themselves, that if there hadn't been a Warsaw uprising hundreds of lives would never have been lost, that if the Jews hadn't manipulated the banking system etc etc.
You haven't been paying attention, then. The deaths of 20,000 civilians is horrific and terrible. I just place the blame where it correctly belongs -- with Hamas and Hamas supporters.
The ICJ has never been asked to opine on the legal status of the territory. To claim that it has is disingenuous.The UN and ICJ disagree with what you're saying though, so you are clearly wrong and that flawed reasoning likely extends to many other things you claim are true here.
Mostly because it was a silly argument. It is not at all disparaging to say that Hamas and those who actively support Hamas activity are responsible for the easily anticipated outcome of their hideous attack on Israeli citizens. Unless you mean that it is disparaging of Hamas. Well, yeah.Why did you ignore the refutation I posted:
I argue that that is disparaging to Jew in the same way your claim is disparaging to Palestinians in Gaza
Mostly because it was a silly argument. It is not at all disparaging to say that Hamas and those who actively support Hamas activity are responsible for the easily anticipated outcome of their hideous attack on Israeli citizens. Unless you mean that it is disparaging of Hamas. Well, yeah.
Did I say "wholly attributable"? No, I did not. I said the responsibility lies with Hamas and those who worked to support Hamas. I'm not blaming the civilians for being killed, which you seem to be accusing me of. They are certainly not responsible for their own deaths.It is disparaging to argue that the deaths of 41,000 people and the destruction of schools and hospitals is wholly attributable to Hamas and supporters.
It is disparaging to argue that the deaths of six million Jews and the destruction of Jewish culture in Europe is wholly attributable to prominent Jews who betrayed Germany after WW1 and the Spartacist uprising that represented a threat of a Jew dominated communist dictatorship.
YOU are arguing the former
NAZIS argued the latter
Each is disparaging for the same reasons - they are lies.
That's odd because I blame Israel for Hamas even launching their attack, for Hamas even existing, for two million people being imprisoned in Gaza in the first place.Did I say "wholly attributable"? No, I did not. I said the responsibility lies with Hamas and those who worked to support Hamas. I'm not blaming the civilians for being killed, which you seem to be accusing me of. They are certainly not responsible for their own deaths.
I'm blaming Hamas. I'm blaming those who committed the atrocities in Israel. I'm blaming those who abducted Israeli citizens. I'm blaming those who held hostages in their homes, cooked them meals, or in any other way contributed to their captivity. I'm blaming those who permitted a tunnel to be built under their child's bedroom. I'm blaming those who fired rockets from mosques, and schools, and hospitals. In other words, I am placing the responsibility on the combatants.
Sigh. Such weak, ridiculous arguments. Israel is in no way obligated to receive enemies they are actively at war with into their State.That's odd because I blame Israel for Hamas even launching their attack, for Hamas even existing, for two million people being imprisoned in Gaza in the first place.
What do you mean "weak"? seeking justice after your home has been stolen is a weak justification for fighting back?Sigh. Such weak, ridiculous arguments. Israel is in no way obligated to receive enemies they are actively at war with into their State.
Israel enters Gaza and the West Bank as it sees fit, any time it wants, it attacked and killed people and destroyed homes in Gaza many times before Oct 7th, for years.States have boundaries. Borders. The citizens of one State (or autonomous, self-governed semi-states) do not have a RIGHT to enter the territory of another State without that State's permission. The fact that an American needs Canada's permission to enter Canada (Yes, even to travel from Alaska to Washington) does not make Alaska a prison.
Some in Gaza originated in the villages around Gaza that were ethnically cleansed, here listen to a Jew:Some borders are quite heavily protected and some are quite porous and open. The reasons for the differences are often due to the presence of or lack of security threats. Entry requirements often vary due to citizenship.
Israel has been pumping drugs into Gaza, were you aware of this? before Oct 7th Israel was seeking to create an addicted society in Gaza, do you know anything about that?And no, before you say it, not having an international airport does not make a country a prison either.
IF the people of Gaza would like to be welcomed in Israel and have a less restricted and more porous border with Israel (or with Egypt), hey, just a suggestion, but committing an atrocity and slaughtering and abducting hundreds of citizens is not the solution. Violence leads away from the direction you want to go. It's not like Israel is saying, hey the more violence you commit, the more welcome you are in our country.
(Let's not forget that Israel had issued 20,000 permits to people of Gaza. They used those travel permits to provide intelligence that facilitated the atrocities.)
A senior Palestinian police officer has accused the Israeli occupation authorities of intentionally facilitating the entry of drugs in the besieged Gaza Strip, Al-Resalah has reported.
According to Colonel Anwar Zo’rob on Wednesday, the drugs not only destroy addicts but also the social fabric of the Palestinians in the enclave.
"90 per cent of the drugs seized inside the Gaza Strip come from Israel through the Kerem Shalom crossing," Anwar Zo'rob, an official at Anti-Narcotics Police Department, said to The New Arab.
"Israel prevents the importation of advanced screening devices into Gaza under the pretext of dual [civilian and military] use, which forces us to rely on traditional tools, mainly manual inspection with the help of police dogs to examine and search goods coming from Kerem Shalom once they enter the enclave," he added.
"Israel insists on flooding our region with drugs to destroy our youths and contribute to spreading the crimes among the population," Zo'rob opined.
Thanks for taking him on. He’s on another thread lying about “ethnic cleansing” and whatnot, and I’ve run out of patience. But I’ll be reading along.Sigh. Such weak, ridiculous arguments. Israel is in no way obligated to receive enemies they are actively at war with into their State.
States have boundaries. Borders. The citizens of one State (or autonomous, self-governed semi-states) do not have a RIGHT to enter the territory of another State without that State's permission. The fact that an American needs Canada's permission to enter Canada (Yes, even to travel from Alaska to Washington) does not make Alaska a prison.
Some borders are quite heavily protected and some are quite porous and open. The reasons for the differences are often due to the presence of or lack of security threats. Entry requirements often vary due to citizenship.
And no, before you say it, not having an international airport does not make a country a prison either.
IF the people of Gaza would like to be welcomed in Israel and have a less restricted and more porous border with Israel (or with Egypt), hey, just a suggestion, but committing an atrocity and slaughtering and abducting hundreds of citizens is not the solution. Violence leads away from the direction you want to go. It's not like Israel is saying, hey the more violence you commit, the more welcome you are in our country.
(Let's not forget that Israel had issued 20,000 permits to people of Gaza. They used those travel permits to provide intelligence that facilitated the atrocities.)
YOUR argument is weak.What do you mean "weak"? seeking justice after your home has been stolen is a weak justification for fighting back?
Since when does that metric matter to a MAGA and insurrection supporter? you now saying that vote count does matter?your killin me, you don't even know how many votes Trump got in your own country !
FFS so lets have "early Nazism" and "political Nazism" and "early modern Nazism" hey? or shall we all just act like adults and just say "Nazism", this is all part of the turd polishing, the desire to control terminology so as to prevent the ideology from being spoken of in honest terms.
Re: .....the desire to control terminology so as to prevent the ideology from being spoken of in honest terms.
YeahVery well said.
I've noticed the importance of obfuscation to individuals who still attempt to excuse Israel's aggression, provocations and criminality.
Thanks,
Why did Trump walk away from the fight? If I REALLY BELIEVED I had been elected president and my opponent was part of a conspiracy to seize power, then it would be MY DUTY as president to protect the nation and refuse to give up power.He was democratically elected, so show me the number of votes he and his rival got.
Unless it's a lie?
The words "culture" and "Israel" should never be used in the same sentence.Yeah![]()
…is that because the Palestinians and other garden variety of Islamic animals never commit any aggression or criminality in their behavior?!
And of course they wrap themselves among civilians, including their own women and children to make sure they die first, instead of giving them access to the tunnels they only access to themselves. Such “brave” people!
While on the other side, Israel sounds air raid sirens and instructs its population to go to the nearest underground bomb shelter.
Notice the difference between the two people and their cultures? Yup. It’s a clear example of good vs evil.