Wasn’t Kutcher the guy who replaced Charlie Sheen on two and a half men? I never read anything about him eating dogs.maybe the claim is that they served dogs at Kutsher's in New York
![]()
Kutsher's Hotel - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wasn’t Kutcher the guy who replaced Charlie Sheen on two and a half men? I never read anything about him eating dogs.maybe the claim is that they served dogs at Kutsher's in New York
![]()
Kutsher's Hotel - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
good point. But Mila Kunis is Jewish so maybe she is bewitching him.Wasn’t Kutcher the guy who replaced Charlie Sheen on two and a half men? I never read anything about him eating dogs.
First, you got his name wrong, second, you know very little about him and third, you clearly don't know what he actually said.
Kushner
"Gaza's waterfront property could be very valuable. The thing that I would try to do if I were Israel right now, is I would just bulldoze something in the Negev. I would try to move people in there."
Interviewer
"Are people in Israel seriously talking about that possibility? About hosting Gazan refugees in what is considered "Israel proper"?
Kushner
"I don't know"
Interviewer
"But that would be something you would try to work on?"
Kushner
"I'm sitting in Miami Beach right now. I would say how do we deal with the terror threat that's there so that it cannot be a threat to Israel or to Egypt, right? I think that both sides are spending a fortune on military. I think neither side really wants to have a terrorist organization enclave, right between them. And Gaza's waterfront property, it could be very valuable to - er - if people would focus on kind of building up, you know, livelihoods, you think about all the money that's gone into this tunnel network and into all the munitions that would have gone into education or innovation, what could have been done. And so I think that it's a little bit of an unfortunate situation there. But I think from Israel's perspective, I would do my best to move the people out and then clean it up."
Antisemitism is about hating someone because they are Jewish. There is nothing Jewish about Israeli foreign policy.Any criticism of Israel is anti semitic. That's the starting point in every conversation with the racist Lisa.
If you paid attention you would understand that he was talking about the land being valuable to the Arabs living there. Try to pay attention.Here's what he actually said in that interview, emphasis mine:
Which is a long winded way of saying lets ethnically cleanse Gaza, put the two million people into a new concentration camp nowhere near the coast, steal all the real estate and make lots of money.
The problem is that this is met with applause by Zionists, none of them here express outrage at the forced displacement of two million people with a view to commercial exploitation of said stolen property.
In short - as is typical - the Zionists openly discuss this (a war crime) in a matter of fact way, much as the Nazis did and that's because, like the Nazis, these large inconvenient populations are not fellow humans but vermin.
Yes, we need a Zionist to always tell us what these people "really mean".If you paid attention you would understand that he was talking about the land being valuable to the Arabs living there. Try to pay attention.
You need a teacher who can help you develop basic comprehension skills. The discussion starts about bull dozing the Negev. There is no mention of who the "them" is there. No mention of displacing a population. Then there is an edit point (at 17 seconds). The next question is about hosting Gaza refugees. He says he doesn't know. Then he makes the point that all the money that is going to terrorist infrastructure (he mentions moey spent on tunnels) should be used to build up Gaza (he mentions education and the waterfront property) (1:04).Yes, we need a Zionist to always tell us what these people "really mean".
Please share the transcript/video though, that substantiates your claim and I note you have no reservations about the relocation of an entire population, that didn't even register on your mind.
A Zionist teacher no doubt!You need a teacher who can help you develop basic comprehension skills. The discussion starts about bull dozing the Negev. There is no mention of who the "them" is there. No mention of displacing a population. Then there is an edit point17). The next question is about hosting Gaza refugees. He says he doesn't know. Then he makes the point that all the money that is going to terrirts infrastructure (he mentions moey spent on tunnels) should be used to build up Gaza (he mentions education and the waterfront property) (1:04).
You could have just quoted his actual words but I understand the value obfuscation has to Zionist arguments.Then he talks about moving people so that Gaza can be cleaned. Unless you think he is talking about providing janitorial services, you might understand that he wants Gaza cleansed of terrorists so that the people who move out (he doesn't say anything about moving the whole population) will return to a clean Gaza in which they can build up properly. If you even listened to it and paid attention then you have no real comprehension skills.
And so I think that it's a little bit of an unfortunate situation there. But I think from Israel's perspective, I would do my best to move the people out and then clean it up."
Their deaths are on the hands of the adult palestinians and arabs that put those children in harms way. When you use a child as a human shield, prepare for that child to be shot full of holes.I'm sure the 17,000 Children the Zionist Pigfuckers have murdered didn't threaten to repeat Oct. 7th every day.
Not according to the ICJ and ICC, there are laws, Israel is BOUND by laws and it is breaking those laws.Their deaths are on the hands of the adult palestinians and arabs that put those children in harms way.
Given that Israel routinely kills civilians and children and bombs schools, shelters and hospitals, why do you think the presence of children affords any protection to a terrorist?When you use a child as a human shield, prepare for that child to be shot full of holes.
Everything in your post is deliberate speculation designed to demonize Israel by creating false narratives about the death toll. It is intended that people have in their minds that Israel "really" killed or is going to kill a 1,000,000 people. You want those numbers to stick in people's heads, instead of the true number which is around 37,000 identified bodies, of which at least half are combatants.
The prediction of future deaths is utter nonsense, as anyone with half a brain would know if they had actually read the original research on this subject.
Re: The prediction of future deaths is utter nonsense, as anyone with half a brain would know if they had actually read the original research on this subject.
Those are antisemitic, anti-Israel organizations, and the rest of your post is more antisemitic lies and propoganda.Not according to the ICJ and ICC, there are laws, Israel is BOUND by laws and it is breaking those laws.
Given that Israel routinely kills civilians and children and bombs schools, shelters and hospitals, why do you think the presence of children affords any protection to a terrorist?
You islamic terrorist huggers are a sorry joke.I'm sure the 17,000 Children the Zionist Pigfuckers have murdered didn't threaten to repeat Oct. 7th every day.
Your islamic terrorist heroes have a long history of using civilians and civilian infrastructure such as schools and hospitals as places to wage gee-had from.Not according to the ICJ and ICC, there are laws, Israel is BOUND by laws and it is breaking those laws.
Given that Israel routinely kills civilians and children and bombs schools, shelters and hospitals, why do you think the presence of children affords any protection to a terrorist?
No, an English teacher.A Zionist teacher no doubt!
You do know that words exist in a conversational context and just quoting them without the context changes their meaning, right? No, you don't because you never had an English teacher.You could have just quoted his actual words but I understand the value obfuscation has to Zionist arguments.
which poeple? Does he say? No. Next.Here's his words that pertain to this:
He said prior to that that if he were Israel he would " just bulldoze something in the Negev" so that's where "the people" are to be moved.
Well, he talks about being cleaned so I guess you DO think Israel will provide janitorial services. And when the discussion earlier was about Gaza refugees, I guess you would prefer that they not be housed. No mention of any other segment of any population. But good wishful thinkiing on your part.I see no mention of "cleansed of terrorists" or "will return to a clean Gaza" yet you seem confident that's what he was "really" speaking about.
Since he says "the people" maybe he is talking about the entire population of Israel, right? He is clearly being asked about "refugees from Gaza".The term "the people" is not "some of the people", as stated by him it's the collective term for the population of the Gaza strip, if you really believe he means some subset of the people then what subset?
all you have done is demonstrated your lack of basic comprehension skills. Sad, really.You are struggling to convince people here that he said something he didn't, why would you do that?
All you've done is make up a contrived interpretation of his words and then insisted this is the correct interpretation, the only good thing about this is that it reveals your desperation as you hastily polish another turd.
This is hysteria again. Other countries and individuals have been charged and convicted of EXACTLY the same crimes, therefore there's no basis to the claim of antisemitism, nobody is exempt from the laws be they African, Arab or Jew.Those are antisemitic, anti-Israel organizations, and the rest of your post is more antisemitic lies and propoganda.
Such a liar. The UN has issued more sanctions against Israel than against Syria, Iran, Iraq, and every other horrible Arab or Muslim state COMBINED.This is hysteria again. Other countries and individuals have been charged and convicted of EXACTLY the same crimes, therefore there's no basis to the claim of antisemitism, nobody is exempt from the laws be they African, Arab or Israeli.
Not according to the ICJ and ICC, there are laws, Israel is BOUND by laws and it is breaking those laws.
Given that Israel routinely kills civilians and children and bombs schools, shelters and hospitals, why do you think the presence of children affords any protection to a terrorist
Lecture us on the "the laws" that don't apply to Hamas for their Oc. 7 declaration of war.This is hysteria again. Other countries and individuals have been charged and convicted of EXACTLY the same crimes, therefore there's no basis to the claim of antisemitism, nobody is exempt from the laws be they African or Israeli.
Shhhhh…..he doesn’t like people to remember what the Muslim savages did to innocent Jews because it doesn’t fit his agenda.Lecture us on the "the laws" that don't apply to Hamas for their Oc. 7 declaration of war.