ACB absolutely wrecked KBJ

Missouri_Mike

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2012
Messages
29,642
Reaction score
23,497
Points
2,405
Man scroll down to her addressing Jackson’s dissent. It’s brutal. She doesn’t even treat her like she’s a judge at all.


I don’t think the rest of the SC thinks much of Jackson. She’s in so far over her head the rest of the court doesn’t even take the time to debate her position.

Name calling and inflammatory language removed
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The judicial coup is over.

Applause.gif
 
I don’t think the rest of the SC thinks much of Jackson. She’s in so far over her head the rest of the court doesn’t even take the time to debate her position. They just basically said this stupid ***** is too dumb to even acknowledge.

That is about it. I read somewhere by someone who would know that before issuing a decision by the court, each judge writes their opinion and passes it around for the others to read as it may influence their decision as well, and that Amy Coney Barrett would not have written her dis of Jackson had the other members of the court thought anything well of her as an actual justice.

But then, remember, this is the woman who when asked, could not say what a woman was.
 
That is about it. I read somewhere by someone who would know that before issuing a decision by the court, each judge writes their opinion and passes it around for the others to read as it may influence their decision as well, and that Amy Coney Barrett would not have written her dis of Jackson had the other members of the court thought anything well of her as an actual justice.

But then, remember, this is the woman who when asked, could not say what a woman was.
That would make sense so I have to wonder who picked her dissenting opinion to be the one that gets published. Are the three lib judges saying yes that’s our strongest opinion we present that one? Or did ACB get to pick that one to summarily dismiss because it was so ******* stupid and easy?

I’m not sure how they decide those things.
 
They updated the headlines, now it's Barrett Eviscerates Jackson, oh man that's gonna leave a mark. :auiqs.jpg: Jackson must have talked some shit about Barrett for the claws to come out like that.
I think it’s more like they all know she’s not qualified and is just an idiot. Even the fat Latina and the dyke know.

It’s the same as the time I had someone on a job site ask me where they could order AC batteries. You can’t you ******* idiot, batteries are DC.

When your college dismisses your opinion on a Constitutional matter only to reply you’re so ******* stupid you aren’t using any Constitutional arguments at all. You may be the dumbest person on the court.
 
Are any left wingers going to post anything saying Jackson isn’t the dumbest ******* judge on the court?

I guarantee if they do their post will be racism in some manner.
 
KBJ was in my HS graduating class.

Swear. She was class President as I recall. #29 in GPA.

1,2,3, and 29 went to Harvard.

Miami Palmetto 1988.

We did not interact. I do not think I had her in any classes. I was a jock, she was one of those involved in all the fruity shit.

But, she was well liked and respected as I recall.

We had some Venn diagram circle of friends that crossed over, but I dont think I ever said a word to her, the class was like 750 kids.

Kinda cool to have a SCOTUS classmate. I just wish she was one of the good guys!
 
Man scroll down to her addressing Jackson’s dissent. It’s brutal. She doesn’t even treat her like she’s a judge at all.


I don’t think the rest of the SC thinks much of Jackson. She’s in so far over her head the rest of the court doesn’t even take the time to debate her position. They just basically said this stupid ***** is too dumb to even acknowledge.
Dude, she's hitting a seriously easy target to try to save face for ruling the wrong way in the original case.

We wouldn't have gone through the last several months of total judicial bullshit, if she had made the correct ruling in the first place.
 
That would make sense so I have to wonder who picked her dissenting opinion to be the one that gets published. Are the three lib judges saying yes that’s our strongest opinion we present that one? Or did ACB get to pick that one to summarily dismiss because it was so ******* stupid and easy?

I’m not sure how they decide those things.
From my understanding they are assigned by the Chief Justice. Of course there is likely some "Volunteering" going on as well.
So....what we have is a "cat fight" going on between two female Justices. (Unsurprising)
But on grounds of Law that anyone who can tell the difference between a Law Book and a U-Line catalog would know.

This is basic government that even 3rd graders know.

Which is why Jerome Powell is packing up his office and getting ready to be fired. Looking forward to his new Job where he can make money somewhat legally for a while.

Pam Bondi fired a couple of lawyers today and a DOJ employee was fired for putting politics primarily over duty....one is going to jail and the others are looking for work.
 
She said TRUMP IS POWER HUNGRY AND LAWLESS?

WTF?

**** her.

Her dissent is obnoxious. So unprofessional!

Maybe she should become a ******* biologist and leave the bench.
 
Her dissent claims if a federal court interprets a law a certain way, EVERYONE must follow that judge’s interpretation of the law.

Wow.
 
15th post
From my understanding they are assigned by the Chief Justice. Of course there is likely some "Volunteering" going on as well.
So....what we have is a "cat fight" going on between two female Justices. (Unsurprising)
But on grounds of Law that anyone who can tell the difference between a Law Book and a U-Line catalog would know.

This is basic government that even 3rd graders know.

Which is why Jerome Powell is packing up his office and getting ready to be fired. Looking forward to his new Job where he can make money somewhat legally for a while.

Pam Bondi fired a couple of lawyers today and a DOJ employee was fired for putting politics primarily over duty....one is going to jail and the others are looking for work.
If it’s volunteering then the other two liberal justices had nothing better to offer and let that broad hang herself. It seems like voluntary judicial suicide was all they had left and Jackson was the one willing to do it.
 
That would make sense so I have to wonder who picked her dissenting opinion to be the one that gets published.

Good question. I don't imagine everyone writes a dissenting opinion so I would guess the chief justice PICKS one person to write her dissent among those who have one. It was the view of the person I read that because the other five justices agreed with the decision, that they in effect agreed with her dissent of Jackson as well otherwise they would not have signed off on it.
 
That would make sense so I have to wonder who picked her dissenting opinion to be the one that gets published. Are the three lib judges saying yes that’s our strongest opinion we present that one? Or did ACB get to pick that one to summarily dismiss because it was so ******* stupid and easy?

I’m not sure how they decide those things.
Anyone can write a Concurring or Dissenting Opinion. Sotomayor wrote one in this case. Kagan and Brown joined in that opinion (they agreed with the opinion). Neither Sotomayor nor Kagen joined in Brown's Dissent.
 
Back
Top Bottom