ACA Risk Pools Less Risky in 2015, CMS Says

Arianrhod

Gold Member
Jul 24, 2015
11,060
1,076
255
Since the major lament in this forum from the RWNJs is about "My money, MY MONEY, MY MONEEEEEEE!" one would think an article like this (less risk = less money spent) would be met with enthusiasm.

Nevertheless, I predict it will be either ignored or dismissed as a lie or, well, some other RW fantasy.

Cited in its entirety because the site is membership only:

Medscape: Medscape Access


ACA Risk Pools Less Risky in 2015, CMS Says

Robert Lowes
August 12, 2016

Mostly abandoned by the nation's largest insurer and threatened by big rate hikes from others, the individual insurance markets, or exchanges, under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) received some good news from the federal government. Spending per enrollee essentially remained the same from 2014 to 2015, decreasing by a mere 0.1%.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), which announced the results yesterday, said they suggest that the ACA state-by-state risk pools are becoming less risky, or less costly to insure, owing to "a broader, healthier risk pool."

"These data are very encouraging for the long-term health and stability of the marketplace," the agency said in a news release. "They suggest that the individual market evolved as would have been expected in 2015, with moderate but real progress toward a broader risk pool as marketplace enrollment grew."

That interpretation appears to fly in the face of health insurers retreating from the ACA exchanges because they view the risk pools as having too many older, sicker enrollees to make a profit on. Exhibit number one here is UnitedHealthcare, which is pulling out of 31 of the 34 states where it had offered exchange plans after losing $475 million on them in 2015.

Other insurers remaining in the exchanges cite higher-than-expected costs for the risk pools as they seek permission from state regulators to increase their premiums next year. Requested rate increases top 10% in all but four states and exceed 30% in six, according to the healthcare consulting firm Leavitt Partners. In contrast, the National Business Group on Health estimates that large employers will see their healthcare costs go up 6% next year and will raise employee premiums on average by 5%.

State regulators will whittle down some of the rates proposed by insurers in the ACA exchanges, but if they whittle too much, more insurers are likely to walk away, said Austin Bordelon, a manager at Leavitt Partners.

Bordeon told Medscape Medical News that he was surprised by the cost findings that CMS released, which were expressed as per member per month (PMPM) paid claims.

"We have not seen the medical (cost) trend as flat as they have," he said. Using data from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Leavitt Partners puts the growth of incurred claims as opposed to paid claims at 10% in 2015. Even allowing that paid claims represent a more accurate cost measure, "we're still surprised," Bordelon said.

Enrollee Costs Rose More in the Broader Insurance Market

The CMS numbers are based on claims data that insurers submit to the agency through dedicated "EDGE" servers. Included are claims from ACA-compliant individual plans that private insurers offer outside of the exchanges. Their insurees are in the ACA risk pool but make up only a small portion of it, said Bordelon.

The agency adjusted the comparison of PMPM paid clams in 2014 and 2015 by eliminating the estimated effect of "cross-year" claims paid in 2015 for services rendered in 2014. There no were comparable claims in 2014 for prior year services because the exchanges debuted in 2014. Cross-year claims constituted an estimated 4% of total claims cost, according to CMS. In another tweak, CMS excluded a small number of insurers that submitted inaccurate claims data.

Although PMPM paid claims fell 0.1% across ACA exchanges as a whole, they tended to fall further in states with the most growth in ACA enrollment in 2015, expressed as the number of months that members were covered, according to CMS. PMPM paid claims decreased on average by 3% in 27 states where member months grew by 50% to 100%, and by 5% in 10 states with 100% growth. Across all exchanges, member months rose by 66%.

CMS said the exchanges outperformed the rest of the overall insurance market (including Medicare), where per-enrollee costs grew between 3% and 6% from 2014 to 2015. That's reflected, for example, in premiums for employer-based family coverage increasing by 4%.

Exchange risk pools ought to improve even more on account of ACA reforms taken in 2016, CMS said. These include reducing the number of enrollees who lose coverage or a premium subsidy because of computer foul-ups and tightening sometimes abused special enrollment periods.

The agency cautioned, however, that stronger risk pools do not necessarily translate into insurers making money as opposed to losing it. Many insurers in the exchanges underpriced their premiums in 2014, reflecting not only a desire to gain marketshare but also learning mistakes in a brand-new market, according to CMS. Exchange-plan premiums rose 2% in 2015, "which would have been sufficient, on average, to keep pace with claims costs." However, it wasn't enough to make up for premium lowballing in 2014 along with the partial phase-out of an ACA reinsurance program that helps insurers cover high-cost enrollees.

Bordelon agreed that insurers charged too little in the first 2 years of the exchanges. "Now they're catching up," he said, referring to the rate increases they want in 2017.

Leavitt Partners, he said, is digging into the CMS report on spending trends in the exchanges. "Methodologically, it make sense," he said. However, Leavitt is handicapped in digging too deep because it doesn't have access to the paid-claims data submitted to CMS through the EDGE servers, he said. "We'd love to get our hands on it."

Follow Robert Lowes on Twitter @LowesRobert


Medscape Medical News © 2016 WebMD, LLC

Send comments and news tips to [email protected].

Cite this article: ACA Risk Pools Less Risky in 2015, CMS Says. Medscape. Aug 12, 2016.
 
Who knows what garbage is posted here.

The OP makes a claim about risk poole.

So what ?

We still spend the same amount...the overall risk has not changed.
 
Who knows what garbage is posted here.

Clearly you don't. Or do you?

The OP makes a claim about risk poole.

That would be "pools." It's not a person.

So what ?

So you don't understand what it means? Maybe one of the adults can explain it to you.

We still spend the same amount...the overall risk has not changed.

So you know more than the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid. My goodness. You no doubt have plenty of contradictory data in your tiny hands that you'll be sharing with us any...minute...now...

Look, Sunny-boy, either ignore me or don't, but stop pretending you are when you aren't.
 
We currently spend 8,500 per person per year.

That hasn't changed.

Any claim about changes (in this case the OP claims lowering) to the risk pool only mean that some other cohort is now a higher risk.

Pretty simple.

Now sure what kind of crapp lies below the OP....not going to look.

But not leaving a stupid claim like this unchallenged.
 
We currently spend 8,500 per person per year.

That hasn't changed.

Any claim about changes (in this case the OP claims lowering) to the risk pool only mean that some other cohort is now a higher risk.

Pretty simple.

Now sure what kind of crapp lies below the OP....not going to look.

But not leaving a stupid claim like this unchallenged.

So IOW rather than actually read the OP, you're just going to keep spouting your talking points. Do you know what a foil is?
 
A good discussion on Risk Pools in general.

Just a little context for those who need to understand a little something about Risk Pools...

Health insurance and high-risk pools

Roughly 135,000 people enrolled in PCIP plans nationwide between 2010 and 2013. To qualify, people had to have been without health insurance for at least six months and must have a pre-existing health condition or have been denied coverage as a result of a health condition.

The PCIP program’s high cost has been attributed in part to the fact that the population served is disproportionately older. More than seven in 10 people enrolled are age 45 and above.

Nearly four in ten claims paid in 2012 were for one of four diagnoses: cancers, ischemic heart disease, degenerative bone diseases, and the follow-up medical care required after major surgery or cancer treatments. In 2012, the average cost per person was $32,108. However, just 4.4 percent of enrollees averaged costs of $225,000 accounting for more than half of all claims paid.

Now that PCIP enrollees have transitioned to the private marketplace (either on or off-exchange) or to Medicaid, their medical expenses are being pooled with a much larger group of people, including healthy insureds. This helps to spread the costs over a larger population and better manage the health care costs of the sicker individuals who were covered by PCIP policies between 2010 and 2014.
 
http://actuary.org/pdf/health/pool_july09.pdf

Pooling risks together allows the costs of
those at higher risk of high medical costs to be
subsidized by those at lower risk.

**********************

Bottom line...if the ACA Risk Pool has come down....things have changed....or low risk enrolees have been taken from another pool which is now going to have a higher risk.

Nothing changes if our spending stays the same.
 
http://actuary.org/pdf/health/pool_july09.pdf

Pooling risks together allows the costs of
those at higher risk of high medical costs to be
subsidized by those at lower risk.

**********************

Bottom line...if the ACA Risk Pool has come down....things have changed....or low risk enrolees have been taken from another pool which is now going to have a higher risk.

Nothing changes if our spending stays the same.

Your white paper is dated July 2009. Kindly prove that "nothing has changed" in seven years.
 

Forum List

Back
Top