it’s like how Democommies see the Constitution as a “ Living Breathing Document “ lol
The constitution was designed to change and adapt to the will of the citizens.........its called Amending the Constitution. Under the terms thereof.... it takes a supermajority of .75% 3/4 of the states/representatives and they must come to an agreement. A simple majority causes friction and division. We live in a Republic, not a democracy, with the people guaranteed republican forms of government at all levels (Article 4, Section 4, Clause 1)....i.e, rule through majority representation.
The US Constitution is the only document that provides a negative format...........the Constitution was written not to place limits upon the PEOPLE/STATES but to limit the power and scope of the Federal Government.......the constiution defines what the feds can and cannot do void of state representation by a super majority ratifcation vote.
Liberalism.........attempts to use the Constitution to place limits upon the STATES, using it as a catch all hammer to hit the states over the head and bring them into submission.
The most important amendment makes it clear that SCOTUS has no authority to change one word of the Constitution.....as any language not found actually written in the Constitution belongs to the STATES/PEOPLE, not to SCOTUS to change the constitution void of REPRESENTATION. Of course its amendment 10. SCOTUS' duty is to arbitrate law, not dictate law from the bench, leaving THE PEOPLE out of the loop.
SCOTUS got one right when it rescinded Roe. v. Wade as it was law that came about void of state representation....its up to each state to regulate such law as its not addressed in the Constitution. The same applies to marriage ....etc.., as marriage is never addressed in the Constitution, thus it's up to the states to write laws that represent the citizens of their states.