About Those Racist Cops and Justice Systems

[John T. Ford]

No, that's what you are showing yourself to be. Every day in this forum we see thousands of straight up overt white racist opinions. In 2021. So shut the fuck up.

Your weak minded uninformed posting of your Hatred, Intolerance, and Racism will NEVER be anything more than just that.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

National Review doesn't like change..........imagine that.

Leftists have been promising change in the inner cities for over 60 years and things have gotten progressively worse. Imagine that.

 

[pknopp]

National Review doesn't like change..........imagine that.

WTF does that have to do with the fact Democrats created and own all the problems they claim to have?

The problems are slowly getting addressed. That you can only see this in political terms is sad.

Police corruption is part of the problem. Black culture is the other part. Addressing the latter can only be resolved through change within that community, but even mentioning this issue is apparently "racist."

It has to start at the top. We are one of the most violent countries in the world and we wonder why the people are also violent.

We're not one of the most violent countries in the world overall, but we are one of the most violent in the First World. The reasons for this are many, but some of those reasons aren't politically correct to mention. Until we are comfortable with admitting the politically incorrect ones, we won't ever really progress past them.

The most peaceful societies in the world are culturally homogeneous, so a certain amount of conflict is inevitable in a multicultural society. And certain cultures are more violent than others.

It has to start at the top.

 

[Utilitarian]

National Review doesn't like change..........imagine that.

WTF does that have to do with the fact Democrats created and own all the problems they claim to have?

The problems are slowly getting addressed. That you can only see this in political terms is sad.

Police corruption is part of the problem. Black culture is the other part. Addressing the latter can only be resolved through change within that community, but even mentioning this issue is apparently "racist."

It has to start at the top. We are one of the most violent countries in the world and we wonder why the people are also violent.

We're not one of the most violent countries in the world overall, but we are one of the most violent in the First World. The reasons for this are many, but some of those reasons aren't politically correct to mention. Until we are comfortable with admitting the politically incorrect ones, we won't ever really progress past them.

The most peaceful societies in the world are culturally homogeneous, so a certain amount of conflict is inevitable in a multicultural society. And certain cultures are more violent than others.

It has to start at the top.

To an extent. Although that would involve more than just police reform. It would also involve certain immigration controls, border security, voting reforms, etc. All of these things tie into the same problems.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Dem problem in Dem cities in Dem states. Dem businesses looted and burned. Dem neighborhood riots. Dems assaulting Dems. I'm detecting a pattern here.

Meanwhile in my church going conservative town city officials have hung the local high school team spirit banners up on main street and everyone is waiting for the farmers markets to open.

A lie. I live in a republican state and the same problems exist. This is an American bi-partisan problem.

Cool. Please list the state and the party affiliations of the major cities within from mayor on down. We will wait.

 

[IM2]

National Review doesn't like change..........imagine that.

WTF does that have to do with the fact Democrats created and own all the problems they claim to have?

The problems are slowly getting addressed. That you can only see this in political terms is sad.

Police corruption is part of the problem. Black culture is the other part. Addressing the latter can only be resolved through change within that community, but even mentioning this issue is apparently "racist."

It has to start at the top. We are one of the most violent countries in the world and we wonder why the people are also violent.

We're not one of the most violent countries in the world overall, but we are one of the most violent in the First World. The reasons for this are many, but some of those reasons aren't politically correct to mention. Until we are comfortable with admitting the politically incorrect ones, we won't ever really progress past them.

The most peaceful societies in the world are culturally homogeneous, so a certain amount of conflict is inevitable in a multicultural society. And certain cultures are more violent than others.

We are the most violent country and so let's talk about politically incorrect.

This cannot be a homogeneous land unless whites take their asses back to Europe, pay our relocation costs back to Africa, and do the same for Asians. When you talk that violent culture shit look in the mirror white man. Because when you do that, you are looking at a member of what has been proven to be the most violent culture on earth.

 

[John T. Ford]

Leftists have been promising change in the inner cities for over 60 years and things have gotten progressively worse. Imagine that.

 

[John T. Ford]

Chicago Black Activists: "Voting Democrat is Black on Black Crime"!--" Government's War On Family"

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Dem problem in Dem cities in Dem states. Dem businesses looted and burned. Dem neighborhood riots. Dems assaulting Dems. I'm detecting a pattern here.

Meanwhile in my church going conservative town city officials have hung the local high school team spirit banners up on main street and everyone is waiting for the farmers markets to open.

A lie. I live in a republican state and the same problems exist. This is an American bi-partisan problem.

The major crime spree in my rural Republican region that has no smog, you can drink from the streams, wild animals roam free region in 2020 was a woman writing bad checks.

There was destruction of property and Federal crimes committed on Halloween in our Republican TRUMP county. By that I mean kids threw a pumpkin at my neighbors mailbox destroying it.

You trump supporters are delusional.

Trump has nothing to do with the 57 mass shootings in Democrat cities since Biden was installed. Neither does Trump have anything to do with Democrat run cities hiring, as you put it, racist cops who murder blacks.

100% owned by you Democrats.

Yes trump does. There are really no democrat or republican cities. Republicans live in so called democratic cities. They mayor of a city can be democrat and the majority of the city council can be republican. You right wing pricks don't want to take responsibility for your violence. Police tend to be republican and the police department hires police. There was a record number of shootings last year during a republican presidency. The years of trump there were increases in mass shootings. The problem is bi partisan and the FBI states that the greatest threat of domestic violence comes from the right.

Own that, right winger.

The inner city hell holes the leftists have created over the past 60 years are more violent than most third world countries. Own that leftist.

 

[IM2]

Dem problem in Dem cities in Dem states. Dem businesses looted and burned. Dem neighborhood riots. Dems assaulting Dems. I'm detecting a pattern here.

Meanwhile in my church going conservative town city officials have hung the local high school team spirit banners up on main street and everyone is waiting for the farmers markets to open.

A lie. I live in a republican state and the same problems exist. This is an American bi-partisan problem.

Cool. Please list the state and the party affiliations of the major cities within from mayor on down. We will wait.

No. Because democrats and republicans live in these cities, run city agencies and make up city councils and various community goards. Failed republican national policy as well as failures of republican state policy in something like 37 republican controlled states is what you want to avoid.

Our states economy was ruined by a republican governor and a republican majority in the legislature. Because of that policy, this state did not have the funds for eduvation or essential services. Rural hospitals were forced to close, killing thousands of jobs. Our state bond rating was reduced several times. So just face the truth, because republican policy failed this nation during GW Bush and we paid a very high price due to republican failure during trump.

 

[Utilitarian]

National Review doesn't like change..........imagine that.

WTF does that have to do with the fact Democrats created and own all the problems they claim to have?

The problems are slowly getting addressed. That you can only see this in political terms is sad.

Police corruption is part of the problem. Black culture is the other part. Addressing the latter can only be resolved through change within that community, but even mentioning this issue is apparently "racist."

It has to start at the top. We are one of the most violent countries in the world and we wonder why the people are also violent.

We're not one of the most violent countries in the world overall, but we are one of the most violent in the First World. The reasons for this are many, but some of those reasons aren't politically correct to mention. Until we are comfortable with admitting the politically incorrect ones, we won't ever really progress past them.

The most peaceful societies in the world are culturally homogeneous, so a certain amount of conflict is inevitable in a multicultural society. And certain cultures are more violent than others.

We are the most violent country and so let's talk about politically incorrect.

This cannot be a homogeneous land unless whites take their asses back to Europe, pay our relocation costs back to Africa, and do the same for Asians. When you talk that violent culture shit look in the mirror white man. Because when you do that, you are looking at a member of what has been proven to be the most violent culture on earth.

Anyone who thinks Europeans are the most violent cultures should brush up on history. While it is true that Europeans were the most effective at colonizing the world, the violence employed was comparatively less than that of the Muslims or various Asian cultures. What stands out as different about the conquests of Europeans is the timing and technology. The only reason Europeans dominated so much of the world from the 1600s onward is due to the advancement of technology. With better weapons and better transport, it's easier to conquer a larger amount of area and more cultures.

If the Mongols had developed firearms first and had a culture more focused on global trade, Europe would likely be populated by mostly people of Mongolian descent and would speak Mongolian or some derivative of it.

Your focus on white colonialism is relevant in terms of recent history, but your lack of seeing the big picture keeps you from realizing that whites aren't that different from any other race. They just advanced at the right time for dominance. Europeans are slowly fading away in terms of the percentage of the world's population, and practically every white majority nation is determined to be more diverse, while very few non-white majority countries have this focus. If anything, whites overall have become a lot more submissive now than they were a few centuries ago. I guess that's part of what enables militant mindsets like your own.

The Atlantic Slave Trade was a terrible practice, but it's not exactly unique in history. Slavery has been around for a long time and in practically every major culture. It was certainly not an alien practice for most Africans, and even today, there is a large slave trade in Libya. Arabs were the first to capitalize on the slave trade in Africa, and Europeans just expanded on it.

 

[IM2]

Chicago Black Activists: "Voting Democrat is Black on Black Crime"!--" Government's War On Family"

Lol! He we go with the white boy using a sellout thinking that by doing so, his argument has merit.

Chicago is not the whole nation and:

Study Details Clout of Wealthy, White Donors in Chicago Politics

The report, “How Chicago’s White Donor Class Distorts City Policy,” was released by Common Cause, Demos, Reclaim Chicago and People’s Action. It examines the city’s hotly-contested 2015 mayoral race, concluding that more than 90 percent of the money raised by the two leading candidates came in donations of more than $1,000 and that just over half of the money was provided by out-of-town donors.

Nearly nine out of every 10 of those large-dollar donors were white and almost three-quarters of them make more than $100,000 per year, the report said. In contrast, just 39 percent of Chicagoans are white and only 15 percent earn $100,000 or more annually.

“These findings demonstrate how out-of-balance and out-of-touch with everyday Chicagoans our local government has become,” said Trevor Gervais, lead organizer for Common Cause Illinois. “By virtue of their ability to pour big money into the campaign chests of local leaders, a relative handful of wealthy white donors is able to drown out the voices of African-American, Latino and other residents and drive policy decisions by the mayor and aldermen.

Study Details Clout of Wealthy, White Donors in Chicago Politics (commoncause.org)


How Chicago's White Donor Class Distorts City Policy

Chicago’s 2015 mayoral race was one of the most expensive in the nation’s history, with big donors playing an outsized role in financing both candidates’ campaigns. In fact, over 90 percent of the money raised by the two major candidates came from donors giving more than $1,000, and more than half (52%) came from donors outside of the city.[1] Both the Chicago mayoral and council elections are primarily financed by white, male donors who don’t reflect the racial and class diversity of the city’s residents. The experience in Chicago is emblematic of national elections, where a small cadre of white major donors—.01 percent—accounted for over 40 percent of all campaign contributions.[2] New research provides disturbing evidence that the financing of our elections by a small group of big donors has very real consequences in terms of the public policies that get enacted.[3] In fact, when the preferences of the donor class diverge with those of the average voter, it is the donor class’s preferences that win. But donors and voters don’t always agree. For example, while 34% of non-donors living in Chicago support the Bowles-Simpson austerity plan, 62% of Chicago donors do. The preferences of the white, male and rich donor class diverge strongly from ordinary Chicagoans but it’s their agenda that’s being implemented.

How Chicago's White Donor Class Distorts City Policy | Demos

Rich, White Political Donors Have Been A Disaster For Chicago


“Chicago’s democracy is being distorted by an overwhelmingly, white, wealthy and male donor class,” reads the study. Thanks to money counting for much more influence in politics than actual votes, city policies reflect the wishes of the donors rather than residents or voters.

The study referenced a survey called the Survey of Economically Successful Americans, which compared the policy preferences of those with a median wealth of $7.5 million. The study showed that wealthy political donors are much less likely to believe that government has a role in caring for its citizens than the average person. While nearly three-quarters of the general public believes government should ensure citizens receive a college education, have a higher minimum wage, and that no one should go without adequate food, clothing or shelter, only about 40 percent of wealthy people do. While nearly 90 percent of average Americans believe government should spend whatever necessary to ensure all children get a decent public education, only 35 percent of the rich agree.

Rich, White Political Donors Have Been A Disaster For Chicago - The Chicagoist

These are conservative whites. Republicans.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

National Review doesn't like change..........imagine that.

WTF does that have to do with the fact Democrats created and own all the problems they claim to have?

The problems are slowly getting addressed. That you can only see this in political terms is sad.

Police corruption is part of the problem. Black culture is the other part. Addressing the latter can only be resolved through change within that community, but even mentioning this issue is apparently "racist."

It has to start at the top. We are one of the most violent countries in the world and we wonder why the people are also violent.

We're not one of the most violent countries in the world overall, but we are one of the most violent in the First World. The reasons for this are many, but some of those reasons aren't politically correct to mention. Until we are comfortable with admitting the politically incorrect ones, we won't ever really progress past them.

The most peaceful societies in the world are culturally homogeneous, so a certain amount of conflict is inevitable in a multicultural society. And certain cultures are more violent than others.

We are the most violent country and so let's talk about politically incorrect.

This cannot be a homogeneous land unless whites take their asses back to Europe, pay our relocation costs back to Africa, and do the same for Asians. When you talk that violent culture shit look in the mirror white man. Because when you do that, you are looking at a member of what has been proven to be the most violent culture on earth.

Out of the three races you posted which is the most violent in the US?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Chicago Black Activists: "Voting Democrat is Black on Black Crime"!--" Government's War On Family"

Lol! He we go with the white boy using a sellout thinking that by doing so, his argument has merit.

Chicago is not the whole nation and:

Study Details Clout of Wealthy, White Donors in Chicago Politics

The report, “How Chicago’s White Donor Class Distorts City Policy,” was released by Common Cause, Demos, Reclaim Chicago and People’s Action. It examines the city’s hotly-contested 2015 mayoral race, concluding that more than 90 percent of the money raised by the two leading candidates came in donations of more than $1,000 and that just over half of the money was provided by out-of-town donors.

Nearly nine out of every 10 of those large-dollar donors were white and almost three-quarters of them make more than $100,000 per year, the report said. In contrast, just 39 percent of Chicagoans are white and only 15 percent earn $100,000 or more annually.

“These findings demonstrate how out-of-balance and out-of-touch with everyday Chicagoans our local government has become,” said Trevor Gervais, lead organizer for Common Cause Illinois. “By virtue of their ability to pour big money into the campaign chests of local leaders, a relative handful of wealthy white donors is able to drown out the voices of African-American, Latino and other residents and drive policy decisions by the mayor and aldermen.

Study Details Clout of Wealthy, White Donors in Chicago Politics (commoncause.org)


How Chicago's White Donor Class Distorts City Policy

Chicago’s 2015 mayoral race was one of the most expensive in the nation’s history, with big donors playing an outsized role in financing both candidates’ campaigns. In fact, over 90 percent of the money raised by the two major candidates came from donors giving more than $1,000, and more than half (52%) came from donors outside of the city.[1] Both the Chicago mayoral and council elections are primarily financed by white, male donors who don’t reflect the racial and class diversity of the city’s residents. The experience in Chicago is emblematic of national elections, where a small cadre of white major donors—.01 percent—accounted for over 40 percent of all campaign contributions.[2] New research provides disturbing evidence that the financing of our elections by a small group of big donors has very real consequences in terms of the public policies that get enacted.[3] In fact, when the preferences of the donor class diverge with those of the average voter, it is the donor class’s preferences that win. But donors and voters don’t always agree. For example, while 34% of non-donors living in Chicago support the Bowles-Simpson austerity plan, 62% of Chicago donors do. The preferences of the white, male and rich donor class diverge strongly from ordinary Chicagoans but it’s their agenda that’s being implemented.

How Chicago's White Donor Class Distorts City Policy | Demos

Rich, White Political Donors Have Been A Disaster For Chicago


“Chicago’s democracy is being distorted by an overwhelmingly, white, wealthy and male donor class,” reads the study. Thanks to money counting for much more influence in politics than actual votes, city policies reflect the wishes of the donors rather than residents or voters.

The study referenced a survey called the Survey of Economically Successful Americans, which compared the policy preferences of those with a median wealth of $7.5 million. The study showed that wealthy political donors are much less likely to believe that government has a role in caring for its citizens than the average person. While nearly three-quarters of the general public believes government should ensure citizens receive a college education, have a higher minimum wage, and that no one should go without adequate food, clothing or shelter, only about 40 percent of wealthy people do. While nearly 90 percent of average Americans believe government should spend whatever necessary to ensure all children get a decent public education, only 35 percent of the rich agree.

Rich, White Political Donors Have Been A Disaster For Chicago - The Chicagoist

These are conservative whites. Republicans.

Hahahaaha

 

[IM2]

National Review doesn't like change..........imagine that.

WTF does that have to do with the fact Democrats created and own all the problems they claim to have?

The problems are slowly getting addressed. That you can only see this in political terms is sad.

Police corruption is part of the problem. Black culture is the other part. Addressing the latter can only be resolved through change within that community, but even mentioning this issue is apparently "racist."

It has to start at the top. We are one of the most violent countries in the world and we wonder why the people are also violent.

We're not one of the most violent countries in the world overall, but we are one of the most violent in the First World. The reasons for this are many, but some of those reasons aren't politically correct to mention. Until we are comfortable with admitting the politically incorrect ones, we won't ever really progress past them.

The most peaceful societies in the world are culturally homogeneous, so a certain amount of conflict is inevitable in a multicultural society. And certain cultures are more violent than others.

We are the most violent country and so let's talk about politically incorrect.

This cannot be a homogeneous land unless whites take their asses back to Europe, pay our relocation costs back to Africa, and do the same for Asians. When you talk that violent culture shit look in the mirror white man. Because when you do that, you are looking at a member of what has been proven to be the most violent culture on earth.

Anyone who thinks Europeans are the most violent cultures should brush up on history. While it is true that Europeans were the most effective at colonizing the world, the violence employed was comparatively less than that of the Muslims or various Asian cultures. What stands out as different about the conquests of Europeans is the timing and technology. The only reason Europeans dominated so much of the world from the 1600s onward is due to the advancement of technology. With better weapons and better transport, it's easier to conquer a larger amount of area and more cultures.

If the Mongols had developed firearms first and had a culture more focused on global trade, Europe would likely be populated by mostly people of Mongolian descent and would speak Mongolian or some derivative of it.

Your focus on white colonialism is relevant in terms of recent history, but your lack of seeing the big picture keeps you from realizing that whites aren't that different from any other race. They just advanced at the right time for dominance. Europeans are slowly fading away in terms of the percentage of the world's population, and practically every white majority nation is determined to be more diverse, while very few non-white majority countries have this focus. If anything, whites overall have become a lot more submissive now than they were a few centuries ago. I guess that's part of what enables militant mindsets like your own.

The Atlantic Slave Trade was a terrible practice, but it's not exactly unique in history. Slavery has been around for a long time and in practically every major culture. It was certainly not an alien practice for most Africans, and even today, there is a large slave trade in Libya. Arabs were the first to capitalize on the slave trade in Africa, and Europeans just expanded on it.

I have brushed up on history. The complete version. I don't listen to whites talking about ancient history who then want to tell me how talking about things that happened 100 years ago was too far back and how I should not be stuck in the past. Whites like you want to make excuses for whites. When you talk your so-called politically ijcorrect bullshit, you will be forced to face the truth. And that truth shows us that in MODERN times, including this very second, white culturr, if you want to make claims about cultures, has been the most violent.

 

[John T. Ford]

Chicago Black Activists: "Voting Democrat is Black on Black Crime"!--" Government's War On Family"

Lol! He we go with the white boy using a sellout thinking that by doing so, his argument has merit.

Chicago is not the whole nation and:

Study Details Clout of Wealthy, White Donors in Chicago Politics

The report, “How Chicago’s White Donor Class Distorts City Policy,” was released by Common Cause, Demos, Reclaim Chicago and People’s Action. It examines the city’s hotly-contested 2015 mayoral race, concluding that more than 90 percent of the money raised by the two leading candidates came in donations of more than $1,000 and that just over half of the money was provided by out-of-town donors.

Nearly nine out of every 10 of those large-dollar donors were white and almost three-quarters of them make more than $100,000 per year, the report said. In contrast, just 39 percent of Chicagoans are white and only 15 percent earn $100,000 or more annually.

“These findings demonstrate how out-of-balance and out-of-touch with everyday Chicagoans our local government has become,” said Trevor Gervais, lead organizer for Common Cause Illinois. “By virtue of their ability to pour big money into the campaign chests of local leaders, a relative handful of wealthy white donors is able to drown out the voices of African-American, Latino and other residents and drive policy decisions by the mayor and aldermen.

Study Details Clout of Wealthy, White Donors in Chicago Politics (commoncause.org)


How Chicago's White Donor Class Distorts City Policy

Chicago’s 2015 mayoral race was one of the most expensive in the nation’s history, with big donors playing an outsized role in financing both candidates’ campaigns. In fact, over 90 percent of the money raised by the two major candidates came from donors giving more than $1,000, and more than half (52%) came from donors outside of the city.[1] Both the Chicago mayoral and council elections are primarily financed by white, male donors who don’t reflect the racial and class diversity of the city’s residents. The experience in Chicago is emblematic of national elections, where a small cadre of white major donors—.01 percent—accounted for over 40 percent of all campaign contributions.[2] New research provides disturbing evidence that the financing of our elections by a small group of big donors has very real consequences in terms of the public policies that get enacted.[3] In fact, when the preferences of the donor class diverge with those of the average voter, it is the donor class’s preferences that win. But donors and voters don’t always agree. For example, while 34% of non-donors living in Chicago support the Bowles-Simpson austerity plan, 62% of Chicago donors do. The preferences of the white, male and rich donor class diverge strongly from ordinary Chicagoans but it’s their agenda that’s being implemented.

How Chicago's White Donor Class Distorts City Policy | Demos

Rich, White Political Donors Have Been A Disaster For Chicago


“Chicago’s democracy is being distorted by an overwhelmingly, white, wealthy and male donor class,” reads the study. Thanks to money counting for much more influence in politics than actual votes, city policies reflect the wishes of the donors rather than residents or voters.

The study referenced a survey called the Survey of Economically Successful Americans, which compared the policy preferences of those with a median wealth of $7.5 million. The study showed that wealthy political donors are much less likely to believe that government has a role in caring for its citizens than the average person. While nearly three-quarters of the general public believes government should ensure citizens receive a college education, have a higher minimum wage, and that no one should go without adequate food, clothing or shelter, only about 40 percent of wealthy people do. While nearly 90 percent of average Americans believe government should spend whatever necessary to ensure all children get a decent public education, only 35 percent of the rich agree.

Rich, White Political Donors Have Been A Disaster For Chicago - The Chicagoist

These are conservative whites. Republicans.

How about you come over to this thread and again tell us about all those imaginary white supremacist you see behind very bush.

"God, please help me to hate white people"

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2021/04/17/mercer-u-theology-profs-prayer-dear-god-please-help-me-to-hate-white-people/ What kind of bull crap is this? I'm all for equality, I hate everyone equally! :rolleyes:

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[IM2]

National Review doesn't like change..........imagine that.

WTF does that have to do with the fact Democrats created and own all the problems they claim to have?

The problems are slowly getting addressed. That you can only see this in political terms is sad.

Police corruption is part of the problem. Black culture is the other part. Addressing the latter can only be resolved through change within that community, but even mentioning this issue is apparently "racist."

It has to start at the top. We are one of the most violent countries in the world and we wonder why the people are also violent.

We're not one of the most violent countries in the world overall, but we are one of the most violent in the First World. The reasons for this are many, but some of those reasons aren't politically correct to mention. Until we are comfortable with admitting the politically incorrect ones, we won't ever really progress past them.

The most peaceful societies in the world are culturally homogeneous, so a certain amount of conflict is inevitable in a multicultural society. And certain cultures are more violent than others.

We are the most violent country and so let's talk about politically incorrect.

This cannot be a homogeneous land unless whites take their asses back to Europe, pay our relocation costs back to Africa, and do the same for Asians. When you talk that violent culture shit look in the mirror white man. Because when you do that, you are looking at a member of what has been proven to be the most violent culture on earth.

Out of the three races you posted which is the most violent in the US?

Whites. The annual numbers show this.

 

[IM2]

Chicago Black Activists: "Voting Democrat is Black on Black Crime"!--" Government's War On Family"

Lol! He we go with the white boy using a sellout thinking that by doing so, his argument has merit.

Chicago is not the whole nation and:

Study Details Clout of Wealthy, White Donors in Chicago Politics

The report, “How Chicago’s White Donor Class Distorts City Policy,” was released by Common Cause, Demos, Reclaim Chicago and People’s Action. It examines the city’s hotly-contested 2015 mayoral race, concluding that more than 90 percent of the money raised by the two leading candidates came in donations of more than $1,000 and that just over half of the money was provided by out-of-town donors.

Nearly nine out of every 10 of those large-dollar donors were white and almost three-quarters of them make more than $100,000 per year, the report said. In contrast, just 39 percent of Chicagoans are white and only 15 percent earn $100,000 or more annually.

“These findings demonstrate how out-of-balance and out-of-touch with everyday Chicagoans our local government has become,” said Trevor Gervais, lead organizer for Common Cause Illinois. “By virtue of their ability to pour big money into the campaign chests of local leaders, a relative handful of wealthy white donors is able to drown out the voices of African-American, Latino and other residents and drive policy decisions by the mayor and aldermen.

Study Details Clout of Wealthy, White Donors in Chicago Politics (commoncause.org)


How Chicago's White Donor Class Distorts City Policy

Chicago’s 2015 mayoral race was one of the most expensive in the nation’s history, with big donors playing an outsized role in financing both candidates’ campaigns. In fact, over 90 percent of the money raised by the two major candidates came from donors giving more than $1,000, and more than half (52%) came from donors outside of the city.[1] Both the Chicago mayoral and council elections are primarily financed by white, male donors who don’t reflect the racial and class diversity of the city’s residents. The experience in Chicago is emblematic of national elections, where a small cadre of white major donors—.01 percent—accounted for over 40 percent of all campaign contributions.[2] New research provides disturbing evidence that the financing of our elections by a small group of big donors has very real consequences in terms of the public policies that get enacted.[3] In fact, when the preferences of the donor class diverge with those of the average voter, it is the donor class’s preferences that win. But donors and voters don’t always agree. For example, while 34% of non-donors living in Chicago support the Bowles-Simpson austerity plan, 62% of Chicago donors do. The preferences of the white, male and rich donor class diverge strongly from ordinary Chicagoans but it’s their agenda that’s being implemented.

How Chicago's White Donor Class Distorts City Policy | Demos

Rich, White Political Donors Have Been A Disaster For Chicago


“Chicago’s democracy is being distorted by an overwhelmingly, white, wealthy and male donor class,” reads the study. Thanks to money counting for much more influence in politics than actual votes, city policies reflect the wishes of the donors rather than residents or voters.

The study referenced a survey called the Survey of Economically Successful Americans, which compared the policy preferences of those with a median wealth of $7.5 million. The study showed that wealthy political donors are much less likely to believe that government has a role in caring for its citizens than the average person. While nearly three-quarters of the general public believes government should ensure citizens receive a college education, have a higher minimum wage, and that no one should go without adequate food, clothing or shelter, only about 40 percent of wealthy people do. While nearly 90 percent of average Americans believe government should spend whatever necessary to ensure all children get a decent public education, only 35 percent of the rich agree.

Rich, White Political Donors Have Been A Disaster For Chicago - The Chicagoist

These are conservative whites. Republicans.

How about you come over to this thread and again tell us about all those imaginary white supremacist you see behind very bush.

"God, please help me to hate white people"

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2021/04/17/mercer-u-theology-profs-prayer-dear-god-please-help-me-to-hate-white-people/ What kind of bull crap is this? I'm all for equality, I hate everyone equally! :rolleyes:

www.usmessageboard.com

Gaslighting doesn't work here bitch. White supremacists exist and you know it. In fact, you want to claim they don't because you are one.

 

[IM2]

Chicago Black Activists: "Voting Democrat is Black on Black Crime"!--" Government's War On Family"

Lol! He we go with the white boy using a sellout thinking that by doing so, his argument has merit.

Chicago is not the whole nation and:

Study Details Clout of Wealthy, White Donors in Chicago Politics

The report, “How Chicago’s White Donor Class Distorts City Policy,” was released by Common Cause, Demos, Reclaim Chicago and People’s Action. It examines the city’s hotly-contested 2015 mayoral race, concluding that more than 90 percent of the money raised by the two leading candidates came in donations of more than $1,000 and that just over half of the money was provided by out-of-town donors.

Nearly nine out of every 10 of those large-dollar donors were white and almost three-quarters of them make more than $100,000 per year, the report said. In contrast, just 39 percent of Chicagoans are white and only 15 percent earn $100,000 or more annually.

“These findings demonstrate how out-of-balance and out-of-touch with everyday Chicagoans our local government has become,” said Trevor Gervais, lead organizer for Common Cause Illinois. “By virtue of their ability to pour big money into the campaign chests of local leaders, a relative handful of wealthy white donors is able to drown out the voices of African-American, Latino and other residents and drive policy decisions by the mayor and aldermen.

Study Details Clout of Wealthy, White Donors in Chicago Politics (commoncause.org)


How Chicago's White Donor Class Distorts City Policy

Chicago’s 2015 mayoral race was one of the most expensive in the nation’s history, with big donors playing an outsized role in financing both candidates’ campaigns. In fact, over 90 percent of the money raised by the two major candidates came from donors giving more than $1,000, and more than half (52%) came from donors outside of the city.[1] Both the Chicago mayoral and council elections are primarily financed by white, male donors who don’t reflect the racial and class diversity of the city’s residents. The experience in Chicago is emblematic of national elections, where a small cadre of white major donors—.01 percent—accounted for over 40 percent of all campaign contributions.[2] New research provides disturbing evidence that the financing of our elections by a small group of big donors has very real consequences in terms of the public policies that get enacted.[3] In fact, when the preferences of the donor class diverge with those of the average voter, it is the donor class’s preferences that win. But donors and voters don’t always agree. For example, while 34% of non-donors living in Chicago support the Bowles-Simpson austerity plan, 62% of Chicago donors do. The preferences of the white, male and rich donor class diverge strongly from ordinary Chicagoans but it’s their agenda that’s being implemented.

How Chicago's White Donor Class Distorts City Policy | Demos

Rich, White Political Donors Have Been A Disaster For Chicago


“Chicago’s democracy is being distorted by an overwhelmingly, white, wealthy and male donor class,” reads the study. Thanks to money counting for much more influence in politics than actual votes, city policies reflect the wishes of the donors rather than residents or voters.

The study referenced a survey called the Survey of Economically Successful Americans, which compared the policy preferences of those with a median wealth of $7.5 million. The study showed that wealthy political donors are much less likely to believe that government has a role in caring for its citizens than the average person. While nearly three-quarters of the general public believes government should ensure citizens receive a college education, have a higher minimum wage, and that no one should go without adequate food, clothing or shelter, only about 40 percent of wealthy people do. While nearly 90 percent of average Americans believe government should spend whatever necessary to ensure all children get a decent public education, only 35 percent of the rich agree.

Rich, White Political Donors Have Been A Disaster For Chicago - The Chicagoist

These are conservative whites. Republicans.

Hahahaaha

Can't handle the facts paleface?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

National Review doesn't like change..........imagine that.

WTF does that have to do with the fact Democrats created and own all the problems they claim to have?

The problems are slowly getting addressed. That you can only see this in political terms is sad.

Police corruption is part of the problem. Black culture is the other part. Addressing the latter can only be resolved through change within that community, but even mentioning this issue is apparently "racist."

It has to start at the top. We are one of the most violent countries in the world and we wonder why the people are also violent.

We're not one of the most violent countries in the world overall, but we are one of the most violent in the First World. The reasons for this are many, but some of those reasons aren't politically correct to mention. Until we are comfortable with admitting the politically incorrect ones, we won't ever really progress past them.

The most peaceful societies in the world are culturally homogeneous, so a certain amount of conflict is inevitable in a multicultural society. And certain cultures are more violent than others.

We are the most violent country and so let's talk about politically incorrect.

This cannot be a homogeneous land unless whites take their asses back to Europe, pay our relocation costs back to Africa, and do the same for Asians. When you talk that violent culture shit look in the mirror white man. Because when you do that, you are looking at a member of what has been proven to be the most violent culture on earth.

Out of the three races you posted which is the most violent in the US?

Whites. The annual numbers show this.

Sure they do.