About Those J6 “People”

[Alweysrite!]

Well in all fairness, you can't actually prove your claim. But I already knew that.

You can't rebut the fact that you had a chance with Biden to prove what's in your imagination about Trump, is true.
Do you think all criminal cases and everything about them should be made public? Or just as part of your two-tiered justice system to damage your political enemies?

 

[Alweysrite!]

You're comparing a party to an individual. Congress almost always polls lower than named politicians. That aside, 18% is still a historic low for Democrats. Despite that, 47% to 43% still say they want Democrats to take control of the House following November's elections.

Voters Give Democrats In Congress A Record Low Job Approval But Still Might Vote For Them In 2026, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Majority Think Trump's Use Of Presidential Power Goes Too Far | Quinnipiac University Poll

"A family squabble spills over into the holidays. Democratic voters want their party to hold the reins of the House but are not the least bit happy about what they are doing at the moment," said Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Tim Malloy.

poll.qu.edu

JD Vance would mop up the floor with Kamala. It would almost be unfair in a debate.

 

[Political-Junkie]

View attachment 1269343

Again, comparing individuals to political parties is not an apples to apples comparison.

 

[Alweysrite!]

Now show which Epstein documents are tied up in courts?

Why do you think the victims don't come out and tell us who victimized them?

 

[Political-Junkie]

When did the victims give up?

Don't know if any have or have not, but you posted "courts" don't release documents. These documents are with the DOJ, not in any court. So all that you posted over and over is meaningless in this debate.

 

[Robert W]

Don't know if any have or have not, but you posted "courts" don't release documents. These documents are with the DOJ, not in any court. So all that you posted over and over is meaningless in this debate.

why do you believe courts will play no role?

 

[Political-Junkie]

You can't rebut the fact that you had a chance with Biden to prove what's in your imagination about Trump, is true.
Do you think all criminal cases and everything about them should be made public? Or just as part of your two-tiered justice system to damage your political enemies?

That's irrelevant given you said there's nothing important to release now because if there was, Biden would have released it, but you admitted you don't actually know what Biden's DOJ reviewed. Means there could be relevant documents to be released. And again, the law stated all documents must be released.

 

[Political-Junkie]

JD Vance would mop up the floor with Kamala. It would almost be unfair in a debate.

Anybody would mop up the floor with Kamala.

 

[Robert W]

That's irrelevant given you said there's nothing important to release now because if there was, Biden would have released it, but you admitted you don't actually know what Biden's DOJ reviewed. Means there could be relevant documents to be released. And again, the law stated all documents must be released.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Why do you think the victims don't come out and tell us who victimized them?

Some reasons compiled by AI.

Epstein survivors often do not publicly name their abusers due to severe fears of retaliation, threats to their safety, and the intense trauma of reliving their abuse. Additionally, many victims face a high risk of aggressive Defamation and Retaliation lawsuits from powerful, wealthy perpetrators who have elite legal teams.Survivors have also cited several specific barriers:

Legal Protections and NDAs: High-profile abusers frequently used Non-Disclosure Agreements and financial settlements to silence victims, though legal experts and lawmakers note that NDAs cannot be used to cover up crimes.

Fear of Defamation Claims: Without concrete evidence, victims speaking out publicly put themselves at major financial risk from wealthy abusers. To combat this, some congressional members and public figures have offered to back legal defense funds for victims who name their abusers.

Safety and Intimidation: The ultra-wealthy network surrounding Jeffrey Epstein involved powerful political figures and celebrities, causing survivors to fear for their safety and the safety of their families if they identify their abusers.

Identification Difficulties: Many victims do not know the actual names of their abusers, as perpetrators routinely used fake names, or the victims were heavily drugged or recruited from overseas.

Lack of Institutional Justice: Many survivors express frustration with the legal system, noting that the Department of Justice DOJ Files Release often redacts the names of male perpetrators while struggling to protect the anonymity of victims. They feel that if the government already possesses the identifiable information and client lists, the burden of naming perpetrators should fall on law enforcement rather than forcing traumatized victims to endure public scrutiny.

 

[Political-Junkie]

why do you believe courts will play no role?

I didn't say none would. I said your claim is in regards to documents in court cases. At this time, none of Epstein's documents are in any court case, do your point has no value in what we're discussing.

 

[Political-Junkie]

View attachment 1269346

That was not done. Trump's DOJ did not comply with that law.

 

[Robert W]

I didn't say none would. I said your claim is in regards to documents in court cases. At this time, none of Epstein's documents are in any court case, do your point has no value in what we're discussing.

You do not mind ruining their cases.

 

[Robert W]

That was not done. Trump's DOJ did not comply with that law.

When did you study the millions of pages?

 

[Robert W]

Some reasons compiled by AI.

Epstein survivors often do not publicly name their abusers due to severe fears of retaliation, threats to their safety, and the intense trauma of reliving their abuse. Additionally, many victims face a high risk of aggressive Defamation and Retaliation lawsuits from powerful, wealthy perpetrators who have elite legal teams.Survivors have also cited several specific barriers:

Legal Protections and NDAs: High-profile abusers frequently used Non-Disclosure Agreements and financial settlements to silence victims, though legal experts and lawmakers note that NDAs cannot be used to cover up crimes.

Fear of Defamation Claims: Without concrete evidence, victims speaking out publicly put themselves at major financial risk from wealthy abusers. To combat this, some congressional members and public figures have offered to back legal defense funds for victims who name their abusers.

Safety and Intimidation: The ultra-wealthy network surrounding Jeffrey Epstein involved powerful political figures and celebrities, causing survivors to fear for their safety and the safety of their families if they identify their abusers.

Identification Difficulties: Many victims do not know the actual names of their abusers, as perpetrators routinely used fake names, or the victims were heavily drugged or recruited from overseas.

Lack of Institutional Justice: Many survivors express frustration with the legal system, noting that the Department of Justice DOJ Files Release often redacts the names of male perpetrators while struggling to protect the anonymity of victims. They feel that if the government already possesses the identifiable information and client lists, the burden of naming perpetrators should fall on law enforcement rather than forcing traumatized victims to endure public scrutiny.

I do not believe this is relevant to courts of law.

 

[Alweysrite!]

That's irrelevant given you said there's nothing important to release now because if there was, Biden would have released it, but you admitted you don't actually know what Biden's DOJ reviewed. Means there could be relevant documents to be released. And again, the law stated all documents must be released.

Not irrelevant. You had your chance to "get Trump ". Time to move on and stop complaining. We have a country to save.

 

[Political-Junkie]

You do not mind ruining their cases.

I'm not bound by you moving goal posts. You were talking about court cases. Now you're talking about cases that don't exist.

 

[Political-Junkie]

When did you study the millions of pages?

Why would I need to? You just posted the law states "all" Epstein related files are to be released.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Not irrelevant. You had your chance to "get Trump ". Time to move on and stop complaining. We have a country to save.

Thanks for abandoning your previous argument.

 

[Robert W]

I'm not bound by you moving goal posts. You were talking about court cases. Now you're talking about cases that don't exist.

You should find a judge and ask him.

The trajectory of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation files from a dormant cache of evidence within the Department of Justice to the central object of a constitutional battle in late 2025 illustrates a collision between populist political mandates and the legal architecture of the American state.

What began as a campaign pledge by Donald Trump in 2024 to expose the secrets of the Epstein ring has become a complex governance crisis involving the separation of powers, the sanctity of grand jury secrecy, and the weaponization of privacy laws.

By November 2025, the discourse had shifted from simple promises of transparency to a high-stakes institutional battle. Following the release of damaging private emails by House Democrats and a subsequent reversal by President Trump to support a full release, the federal government found itself at an impasse.