About Those J6 “People”

Sund who was chief of the capitol police wanted them and was turned down by some democrat.
Yes, but the claim made by someone here was the false claim that it was Trump who offered 10,000 NG to Pelosi and Bowser. And if I'm not mistaken, neither Sergeant at Arms wanted the National Guard there prior to 1/6.
 
Quote Sund saying he wanted the 10,000 NG Trump "offered."

Here’s Who REALLY Denied National Guard Troops on January 6—And It Wasn’t Trump​

Matt Margolis | 6:31 PM on June 09, 2025

Ever since President Trump federalized the National Guard to restore order in Los Angeles and protect federal officers from violent left-wing mobs, the left has been screeching the same tired lie: that Trump “refused” to send the Guard to the Capitol on January 6. It’s a narrative being pushed by Democrat hacks, legacy media mouthpieces, and keyboard warriors who conveniently ignore the facts. The truth? Trump absolutely did authorize and recommend the deployment of National Guard troops ahead of January 6—multiple times.


In fact, days before the riot, Trump personally requested 10,000 National Guard troops to be stationed at the Capitol due to concerns over crowd size. He made that clear the request was turned down because officials were more concerned about how the optics would play with the press than protecting the Capitol. So let’s stop pretending this was some kind of dereliction of duty. Trump saw the threat coming—and they ignored him.

But here’s where it really gets interesting. Just three days before the events of January 6, Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund requested National Guard support—but was shot down because of politics. According to Sund’s testimony before a House subcommittee, House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving rejected the request, saying Speaker Nancy Pelosi would “never go for it.” Sund said Irving dismissed the idea over “optics” and claimed intelligence didn’t justify the move.

According to a timeline of the D.C. National Guard deployment on January 6, 2021, released by the House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight, the chaos on January 6 wasn’t just a security failure—it was a breakdown of leadership driven by political hesitation and bureaucratic delays from Democrat officials and Pentagon brass.


Sund first requested National Guard support on January 3, 2021, but House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving, who was appointed by Nancy Pelosi, rejected it, reportedly saying, “Pelosi will never go for it.” Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger echoed the concern. Sund later testified that Irving tipped off Stenger in advance to block the request.

ICYMI: Even CNN Knows the Riots Are Gonna Backfire on the Left

At the same time, President Trump had already approved the use of the D.C. National Guard. On January 3, he met with Acting Secretary of Defense Chris Miller and authorized Guard deployment. On January 5, he offered 10,000 troops, but the offer was declined.

Meanwhile, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser had requested limited National Guard help for traffic control—but on January 5, she sent a letter to the Pentagon explicitly stating that no further law enforcement support was needed and discouraged additional deployments.

On January 6, after the first breach of the Capitol perimeter at 12:53 PM, Sund began urgently requesting Guard assistance. The Capitol Police Board didn’t approve it until 2:08 PM, and even then, the Pentagon stalled. Senior military officials, including Lt. Gen. Charles Flynn and Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt, reportedly objected to the “optics” of deploying troops at the Capitol.


Although Miller gave verbal approval at 3:04 PM, Guard Commander Major General William Walker didn’t receive official orders to deploy until 5:08 PM. Guardsmen didn’t arrive at the Capitol until nearly 6 PM—hours after the violence had erupted.

The facts are clear: Trump authorized troops, Sund requested help, and yet Democrat leaders and Pentagon officials blocked or delayed every step.

The left is lying in order to rewrite history. Don’t let them control the narrative! Join PJ Media VIP for the facts and in-depth analysis you won't find anywhere else. Now more than ever, support fearless journalism and get 60% off with code FIGHT. Sign up today and support fearless journalism.
 
As far as there being nothing in there to prosecute anyone, we can only speak on what's been released. There's no way of knowing what they're hiding.
Should ALL criminal investigations have their contents released to the public? Regardless of proof or evidence? Or just Epstein because you think Trump might be in them.
If you had an enemy that called the FBI tip line and lied about you would you want that released to the public?
 
Fell way off after the Biden fiasco. How could he still hold the record?

This bodes poorly for the next election since it is clear a lot more Democrats will bolt as I did and kiss the Democrats goodbye.
Yeah, because Democrats had an all time recorded low voter turnout due largely to the crap Democrats pulled off between hiding Biden's mental state and the Harris switcheroo.
 
If there was nothing there, they would have released it all.
Nothing there that can be proven obviously (Biden had the files for 4 years). why would you want a bunch of garbage released out to the public that is not even provable? A bunch of hearsay, he said she said, from a tip line? Are you crazy?
 

Here’s Who REALLY Denied National Guard Troops on January 6—And It Wasn’t Trump​

Matt Margolis | 6:31 PM on June 09, 2025

Ever since President Trump federalized the National Guard to restore order in Los Angeles and protect federal officers from violent left-wing mobs, the left has been screeching the same tired lie: that Trump “refused” to send the Guard to the Capitol on January 6. It’s a narrative being pushed by Democrat hacks, legacy media mouthpieces, and keyboard warriors who conveniently ignore the facts. The truth? Trump absolutely did authorize and recommend the deployment of National Guard troops ahead of January 6—multiple times.


In fact, days before the riot, Trump personally requested 10,000 National Guard troops to be stationed at the Capitol due to concerns over crowd size. He made that clear the request was turned down because officials were more concerned about how the optics would play with the press than protecting the Capitol. So let’s stop pretending this was some kind of dereliction of duty. Trump saw the threat coming—and they ignored him.

But here’s where it really gets interesting. Just three days before the events of January 6, Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund requested National Guard support—but was shot down because of politics. According to Sund’s testimony before a House subcommittee, House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving rejected the request, saying Speaker Nancy Pelosi would “never go for it.” Sund said Irving dismissed the idea over “optics” and claimed intelligence didn’t justify the move.

According to a timeline of the D.C. National Guard deployment on January 6, 2021, released by the House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight, the chaos on January 6 wasn’t just a security failure—it was a breakdown of leadership driven by political hesitation and bureaucratic delays from Democrat officials and Pentagon brass.


Sund first requested National Guard support on January 3, 2021, but House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving, who was appointed by Nancy Pelosi, rejected it, reportedly saying, “Pelosi will never go for it.” Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger echoed the concern. Sund later testified that Irving tipped off Stenger in advance to block the request.

ICYMI: Even CNN Knows the Riots Are Gonna Backfire on the Left

At the same time, President Trump had already approved the use of the D.C. National Guard. On January 3, he met with Acting Secretary of Defense Chris Miller and authorized Guard deployment. On January 5, he offered 10,000 troops, but the offer was declined.

Meanwhile, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser had requested limited National Guard help for traffic control—but on January 5, she sent a letter to the Pentagon explicitly stating that no further law enforcement support was needed and discouraged additional deployments.

On January 6, after the first breach of the Capitol perimeter at 12:53 PM, Sund began urgently requesting Guard assistance. The Capitol Police Board didn’t approve it until 2:08 PM, and even then, the Pentagon stalled. Senior military officials, including Lt. Gen. Charles Flynn and Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt, reportedly objected to the “optics” of deploying troops at the Capitol.


Although Miller gave verbal approval at 3:04 PM, Guard Commander Major General William Walker didn’t receive official orders to deploy until 5:08 PM. Guardsmen didn’t arrive at the Capitol until nearly 6 PM—hours after the violence had erupted.

The facts are clear: Trump authorized troops, Sund requested help, and yet Democrat leaders and Pentagon officials blocked or delayed every step.

The left is lying in order to rewrite history. Don’t let them control the narrative! Join PJ Media VIP for the facts and in-depth analysis you won't find anywhere else. Now more than ever, support fearless journalism and get 60% off with code FIGHT. Sign up today and support fearless journalism.
Trump didn't authorize troops on 1/6 when they were desperately needed.
 
Should ALL criminal investigations have their contents released to the public? Regardless of proof or evidence? Or just Epstein because you think Trump might be in them.
If you had an enemy that called the FBI tip line and lied about you would you want that released to the public?
They've actually been pretty good concealing those identities with redactions on what they've already released. No reason they can't release the rest.
 
Yeah, because Democrats had an all time recorded low voter turnout due largely to the crap Democrats pulled off between hiding Biden's mental state and the Harris switcheroo.
Harris set the record?

Turnout may be the political world’s favorite buzzword. If you’ve ever heard a campaign say that “it’ll all come down to turnout,” you’ll know it has long since become a cliche. Whether they win or lose, candidates often credit (or curse) turnout. Case in point: the 2024 presidential race. Many observers pegged poor Democratic turnout as the primary cause for Kamala Harris’s loss to Donald Trump.

It will come as a surprise to many, then, that “turnout” often lacks a clear definition. There are many ways to look at turnout, ranging from the simplest raw vote totals to complex analyses using voter files and turnout rates from different hypothetical pools of voters. For the purposes of this article, turnout is calculated using the percentage of the citizen, voting-age population that voted in 2024. This allows for a comprehensive overview of the entire country, and a consistent method to calculate turnout across states that heavily vary in election administration and accessibility.

These estimates are not always perfect, as they rely on citizen voting-age population datasets from the Census, which can often be noisy, particularly when it comes to smaller counties. We encourage readers to focus on the broader picture, rather than individual counties, when it comes to our estimates.

In 2024, 65.1% of all voting-age citizens cast a ballot in the presidential election. This is down slightly from the 67.9% turnout in 2020, but is significantly higher than most other recent presidential elections. Across the country, familiar trends emerge: wealthier, and more educated areas tended to have higher turnout. The north, particularly the Upper Midwest and the Pacific Northwest, similarly have higher turnout than Appalachia and the Black Belt.

None of this is unusual, and it all tracks closely with similar turnout trends from previous elections. To get a clearer answer on how turnout impacted the 2024 results, then, we have to dive deeper.

Trump’s Turnout Advantage


In terms of absolute turnout, there does not appear to be any particular correlation with partisanship. Counties that voted for Kamala Harris by 40 points or more had almost the same absolute turnout as counties that voted for Donald Trump by 40 points or more, at 63% for both. However, when we look at the change in turnout from 2020, a different picture emerges.

Trump +40 or higher counties were the only category to achieve greater turnout than 2020. Harris +40 or higher counties saw a decrease of 4.2 percentage points. The overall trendline shows that more Democratic counties generally saw worse turnout relative to 2020 than more Republican counties.
 
15th post
Trump didn't authorize troops on 1/6 when they were desperately needed.
Trump authorized them earlier than that. He does not mess around. Sund reported to congress he wanted them and Bowser said no due to optics. It would not have harmed Bowser to say yes to the offer. While Trump could have gone above her, she said something such as she would handle it. Did Bowser handle that day?
 
Yeah, because Democrats had an all time recorded low voter turnout due largely to the crap Democrats pulled off between hiding Biden's mental state and the Harris switcheroo.
1781493463900.webp
 
It was proven. Not a single state Trump lost reported he would have won if not for fraud. Not a single court found evidence of fraud that would have made Trump the winner.
Cowardly judges
You can't prove what is not there. No systemic fraud happened.
You also can't prove fraud when you are not allowed to submit evidence of fraud.
 
Nothing there that can be proven obviously (Biden had the files for 4 years). why would you want a bunch of garbage released out to the public that is not even provable? A bunch of hearsay, he said she said, from a tip line? Are you crazy?
I want it released for them to prove they're not hiding anything.
 
Back
Top Bottom