A U.S. return to Bagram isn’t a bad idea

My son witnessed our soldiers and afghanis killed in that country, when he was supporting the runaway mission to control and export our values, even after Bin Laden had been found and killed in another country. Going after Bin Laden was the reason we were there. The rest of it was just mission creep, remaining is a quagmire, expensive to maintain, hard on the troops, and keeping us entangled in the interal affairs of that shithole country. If you do not believe, look back at the SonovaBush days after 9/11 and see. That was the mission, not to instill American ideas and ideals forcefully on that country, but to get Bin Laden. True, it was great for defense supply companies, logistic supply companies, equipment maintenance companies, but I feel no need to support those companies with our soldiers, just because occupation is good for business.
You should be asking why the once Al Qaeda deputy leader has been given a green light to visit the UN in New York next week where they demolished the twin towers?
 

A U.S. return to Bagram isn’t a bad idea

The abandoned airfield in Afghanistan was once a symbol of American power. Trump wants it back.

20 Sep 2025 ~~ By Editorial Board

For nearly 20 years, the Bagram air base stood as the sprawling symbol of American power in Afghanistan and as the heart of the long U.S. military intervention there. The Biden administration secretly evacuated the base on July 1, 2021, a few weeks ahead of its chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan. The Afghan army left in control of the base surrendered to the Taliban.
Now, President Donald Trump says he wants Bagram back. “We gave it to them for nothing,” he said in in London on Thursday. “We’re trying to get it back, by the way. … We’re trying to get it back because they need things from us.” Good. Bagram is worth pursuing, though not at any cost.Bagram is strategically important because of its proximity to the border with China and to a nuclear testing range at Lop Nur in a remote part of Xinjiang province. The testing range was long believed abandoned, but there have been reports of increased Chinese military construction activities in the area.
An American military presence at Bagram would also allow the U.S. to conduct counterterrorism operations in a volatile region against the Islamic State-Khorasan terrorist group, which is also at war with the Taliban and has also spread its tentacles into Europe.
What the Taliban wants most from the U.S. is recognition. The country’s seat at the United Nations is still held by the former government. The Taliban would also like to access $7 billion in assets frozen in the U.S. to boost its flagging economy.
Taliban officials don’t sound eager for American troops to return to Bagram. “Afghans...”


Commentary:
One of the worst of the long list incompetent acts of the Biden Administration that cost American lives in the process, was to “evacuate Bagram” first. Trump’s plan was to keep it.
At this point, negotiating a deal would not be in the offing and the recapture of Bagram AFB would be necessary.
That would mean putting our military on the firing line once again...
I don't believe that Trump would want to take that route to retake Bagram AFB...
IMHO, the issue is mute and just a wish on Trump's part.
Former Generals Mark Milley, Lloyd Austin and those in the State Department should be held responsible and the former generals cashiered from the military for their roles in the botched evacuation of Bagram AFB and Afghanistan...

The only thing the U.S. should send (bring) to Afghanistan, are all of the pro-Palestinian protesters. Any pro-Palestinian U.S. citizens should have their citizenship revoked via the Denaturalization Act, then sent off to Afghanistan with the others.
 
The only thing the U.S. should send (bring) to Afghanistan, are all of the pro-Palestinian protesters. Any pro-Palestinian U.S. citizens should have their citizenship revoked via the Denaturalization Act, then sent off to Afghanistan with the others.
~~~~~~>
Indeed, Let the Taliban deal with the Palestinian Hamas tribe.
A lot of Hamas heads will roll...
 
— On Thursday, October 9, Pakistan launched airstrikes on Afghan territory — in Kabul, Khost, Jalalabad, and Paktika.
Islamabad stated that the targets were Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants hiding in Afghanistan.

— On October 10, the Afghan authorities (the Taliban) accused Pakistan of violating their airspace and warned of consequences.
The Afghan Ministry of Defense called the strikes on Kabul an act of aggression against the country's sovereignty.

— Evening of October 11: Fierce clashes broke out between the Taliban and Pakistani forces on the border.
Fighting is taking place along the Durand Line in the provinces of Kunar, Nangarhar, and Helmand.

— The Afghan Taliban claim to have launched attacks on Pakistan at seven points along the border.
 
A brief overview of the “war” between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

1. The Pakistani Taliban has been fighting relatively successfully in Pakistan for a long time. The organization operates largely independently of the Afghan Taliban, but they maintain contact. It is important to remember that the Taliban as such is the brainchild of Pakistani military intelligence.

2. The Pakistani Taliban is waging war on Pakistani territory in an effort to gain territorial control. It attacks the military and security forces, but does not shy away from terrorism. Its tactics are generally similar to those of the Afghan Taliban during the war against foreign intervention and the puppet government. Of course, after the victory of the Afghan Taliban, their Pakistani comrades were encouraged, although the chances of overthrowing the Pakistani military regime on their own are not very high.

3. For rest and replenishment, they periodically cross the border into Afghanistan. The Kabul Taliban, of course, have no intention of expelling their Pakistani brothers, but officially they do not participate in the war on Pakistani territory.
In fact, during the American occupation of Afghanistan, the Afghan Taliban also went to Pakistan to rest and replenish their forces. This was done with the knowledge of Pakistani military intelligence. Even under Obama, the US bombed Taliban camps directly on Pakistani territory.
Pakistan, which possesses nuclear weapons, pretended to be very unhappy when its territory was bombed by American drones, killing Pakistani civilians in the process.

4. Following recent successful attacks by Pakistani Taliban on military personnel, Pakistan decided to respond and struck Kabul, where one of the leaders of the Pakistani Taliban was staying. This was done in the spirit of Israel, so to speak. Like Israel's strike on Qatar, Pakistan's strike on Kabul only worsened the situation.
The leader of the Pakistani Taliban was not killed, and local fighting with the Afghan Taliban on the border began. As you might guess, fighting the Afghan Taliban with airstrikes is a pretty pointless endeavor. And so Pakistan risks getting another additional front on its border, on top of the internal attacks by the Pakistani Taliban and the periodically hot front in Kashmir.

5. Given that China has a serious influence on both the Taliban and Pakistan, I assume that Beijing will try to roll back this escalation in the coming week, as both Afghanistan and Pakistan play an important role in China's plans for economic expansion in Central Asia. China does not need war and instability on its border.

6. On the other hand, India may well be fueling the ambitions of the Pakistani Taliban in order to weaken its long-standing adversary with an additional front. Therefore, there may be a conflict of interests here, although India is also interested in participating in new trade corridors, some of which will pass through Afghanistan to India.
The US also stands to gain from chaos in the region, as it will undermine China's position and allow it to continue pressuring the Taliban to hand over the Bagram airbase to the US. So, under these circumstances, I would not be surprised if the US began to show diplomatic or other support for Pakistan's actions.

In general, they will fight, let off steam, and then, under pressure from external players, conclude a cold peace until the next time. As was recently the case in the war between India and Pakistan. For Trump, by the way, this is another reason for cheap PR — let him reconcile the Taliban and Pakistan.
 
Afghanistan has ended its “retaliatory operation” against Pakistan.

The Afghan Ministry of Defense announced the end of the “retaliatory operation” against Pakistan, Tolo News reports.
The ministry specified that it ended at midnight (22:00 Moscow time the day before). The operation included measures against Pakistani security forces along the Durand Line. They were taken after repeated incursions into the country's airspace and air strikes.
The Ministry of Defense emphasized that in the event of repeated attacks, the Afghan Armed Forces would fight back and defend the borders.

Did Donald end the ninth war without even waking up?
 
— On Thursday, October 9, Pakistan launched airstrikes on Afghan territory — in Kabul, Khost, Jalalabad, and Paktika.
Islamabad stated that the targets were Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants hiding in Afghanistan.

— On October 10, the Afghan authorities (the Taliban) accused Pakistan of violating their airspace and warned of consequences.
The Afghan Ministry of Defense called the strikes on Kabul an act of aggression against the country's sovereignty.

— Evening of October 11: Fierce clashes broke out between the Taliban and Pakistani forces on the border.
Fighting is taking place along the Durand Line in the provinces of Kunar, Nangarhar, and Helmand.

— The Afghan Taliban claim to have launched attacks on Pakistan at seven points along the border.
~~~~~~>
I'm surprised it took this long for the Taliban attack the Paki's.
They're attacking the hand that supplied them with munitions and nurtured them for 20 years against the U.S. and International forces...
 
Clashes between Pakistani and Afghan forces have begun in six provinces.
 
— On Thursday, October 9, Pakistan launched airstrikes on Afghan territory — in Kabul, Khost, Jalalabad, and Paktika.
Islamabad stated that the targets were Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants hiding in Afghanistan.

— On October 10, the Afghan authorities (the Taliban) accused Pakistan of violating their airspace and warned of consequences.
The Afghan Ministry of Defense called the strikes on Kabul an act of aggression against the country's sovereignty.

— Evening of October 11: Fierce clashes broke out between the Taliban and Pakistani forces on the border.
Fighting is taking place along the Durand Line in the provinces of Kunar, Nangarhar, and Helmand.

— The Afghan Taliban claim to have launched attacks on Pakistan at seven points along the border.
What border?
 
Back
Top Bottom