A President and a Charlatan....

[RandallFlagg]

President Richard Nixon - “In any organization, the man at the top must bear the responsibility. That responsibility, therefore, belongs here in this office. I accept it.”




President Barack Hussein Obama - *crickets chirping*





Nixon was a crooked Son of a *****, yet he STILL had more integrity than this little boy who occupies the office at the present time.

 

[LoneLaugher]

President Richard Nixon - “In any organization, the man at the top must bear the responsibility. That responsibility, therefore, belongs here in this office. I accept it.”




President Barack Hussein Obama - *crickets chirping*





Nixon was a crooked Son of a *****, yet he STILL had more integrity than this little boy who occupies the office at the present time.

Crazy people say crazy things.

 

[PoliticalChic]

2. Now....the charlatan. The current President knows who has declared war on America, who attacks us at every opportunity...yet he forbids the unvarnished truth revealed to the public.

a. "President Obama jettisoned the use of the phrase “global war on terror,” preferring ‘overseas contingency operation.’ "
Obama?s War on Terror By Some Other Name - Hit & Run : Reason.com

The president used the word 'terrorism' 21 times in his speech. He used the word 'terrorist(s)' more than that. 'Terror' multiple times.

The rightwing myth about Obama refusing to call terrorism terrorism is more nutty than birtherism.

This post....a perfect example of you obfuscating.

I never said that he didn't target 'terrorism,' did I.

So....why would you imply that I did?
Isn't that the kind of thing you Leftists call 'a lie'?



He tried to shift the blame and hide the ones responsible for 99%+ of the world's terrorism....

....more smoke and mirrors than a fire in a brothel.

 

[PoliticalChic]

President Richard Nixon - “In any organization, the man at the top must bear the responsibility. That responsibility, therefore, belongs here in this office. I accept it.”




President Barack Hussein Obama - *crickets chirping*





Nixon was a crooked Son of a *****, yet he STILL had more integrity than this little boy who occupies the office at the present time.

And actually accomplished stuff!

 

[midcan5]

And actually accomplished stuff!

PC, you show your hypocrisy again and again. As President, Nixon did accomplish things, and so has President Obama, but your narrow mind sees these accomplishments through a filter of a blind and bitter partisan. Sorry your guy lost get over it.

Does Richard Nixon sound like the republicans of today? Heck no. Obama accomplished one of the great things for America, the Affordable Care Act, like FDR's social Security, accomplishments never matched, and will never be matched, by any republican.

"Nixon's accomplishments while in office included: ERA (Equal Rights Amendment), ending segregation, revenue sharing, ending the draft, new anti crime laws, started the process of ending the Cold War, recognized and fought against foreign oil price gouging, and implemented a broad environmental program (he is largely responsible for the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). He was the only President to achieve a balanced national budget between 1961 and 1998....Some of his most acclaimed achievements came in his quest for world stability. During visits in 1972 to Beijing and Moscow, he reduced tensions with China and the U.S.S.R. His summit meetings with Russian leader Leonid I. Brezhnev produced a treaty to limit strategic nuclear weapons. In January 1973, he announced an accord with North Vietnam to end American involvement in Indochina. In 1974, his Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, negotiated disengagement agreements between Israel and its opponents, Egypt and Syria." What were the major accomplishments of Richard Nixon

 

[NYcarbineer]

2. Now....the charlatan. The current President knows who has declared war on America, who attacks us at every opportunity...yet he forbids the unvarnished truth revealed to the public.

a. "President Obama jettisoned the use of the phrase “global war on terror,” preferring ‘overseas contingency operation.’ "
Obama?s War on Terror By Some Other Name - Hit & Run : Reason.com

The president used the word 'terrorism' 21 times in his speech. He used the word 'terrorist(s)' more than that. 'Terror' multiple times.

The rightwing myth about Obama refusing to call terrorism terrorism is more nutty than birtherism.

This post....a perfect example of you obfuscating.

I never said that he didn't target 'terrorism,' did I.

So....why would you imply that I did?
Isn't that the kind of thing you Leftists call 'a lie'?



He tried to shift the blame and hide the ones responsible for 99%+ of the world's terrorism....

....more smoke and mirrors than a fire in a brothel.

So what blame was the President shifting, from your point of view, when he said the following in the speech:

Most, though not all, of the terrorism we faced is fueled by a common ideology — a belief by some extremists that Islam is in conflict with the United States and the West, and that violence against Western targets, including civilians, is justified in pursuit of a larger cause.

 

[NYcarbineer]

President Richard Nixon - “In any organization, the man at the top must bear the responsibility. That responsibility, therefore, belongs here in this office. I accept it.”




President Barack Hussein Obama - *crickets chirping*





Nixon was a crooked Son of a *****, yet he STILL had more integrity than this little boy who occupies the office at the present time.

Why didn't he take responsibility for Kent State and resign in 1970 then?

 

[NYcarbineer]

2. Now....the charlatan. The current President knows who has declared war on America, who attacks us at every opportunity...yet he forbids the unvarnished truth revealed to the public.

a. "President Obama jettisoned the use of the phrase “global war on terror,” preferring ‘overseas contingency operation.’ "
Obama?s War on Terror By Some Other Name - Hit & Run : Reason.com

The president used the word 'terrorism' 21 times in his speech. He used the word 'terrorist(s)' more than that. 'Terror' multiple times.

The rightwing myth about Obama refusing to call terrorism terrorism is more nutty than birtherism.

This post....a perfect example of you obfuscating.

I never said that he didn't target 'terrorism,' did I.

So....why would you imply that I did?
Isn't that the kind of thing you Leftists call 'a lie'?



He tried to shift the blame and hide the ones responsible for 99%+ of the world's terrorism....

....more smoke and mirrors than a fire in a brothel.

Where in that speech did he try to shift the blame in any terrorist act away from the people who actually committed the terrorism?

 

[007]

I find it very funny that every time a thread pops up which puts Obama in a negative light the same group of Obama fluffers rush to his defense -like the brainwashed drones that they are. As funny as it is, it is also sort of pitiful.

I disagree tjvh. I don't think it's funny ha-ha or funny strange. I think it's pathetic, pathetic that there's actually people low enough, stupid enough, duped enough, so brain washed, brain dead or just plain retarded or all of the above, that they will defend someone right down to as the ship goes under water. What went wrong in their life to be so desperate to defend such a complete loser and POS?

I don't get it.

 

[LoneLaugher]

I find it very funny that every time a thread pops up which puts Obama in a negative light the same group of Obama fluffers rush to his defense -like the brainwashed drones that they are. As funny as it is, it is also sort of pitiful.

I disagree tjvh. I don't think it's funny ha-ha or funny strange. I think it's pathetic, pathetic that there's actually people low enough, stupid enough, duped enough, so brain washed, brain dead or just plain retarded or all of the above, that they will defend someone right down to as the ship goes under water. What went wrong in their life to be so desperate to defend such a complete loser and POS?

I don't get it.

Dude.....you should read the forum rules.

 

[Oldguy]

Another right wing, mutual masturbation, circle jerk thread.

Y'all are addicted to anti-Obama porn.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Another right wing, mutual masturbation, circle jerk thread.

Y'all are addicted to anti-Obama porn.

Another failed attempt at macho, quasi-sexual Obama apologia.

And, in addition to being effete....you're stupid, claiming that Reason mag, the Atlantic and Foreign Policy are 'right wing.'


I keep waiting for the opposition to put forth intelligent debate....rebuttal....counter argument.
All the Left comes up with is ignorant coma-boys like you, sitting on their couch chomping pork rinds.


OK....sorry to have distracted you from the 24-hour Cartoon Network.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The president used the word 'terrorism' 21 times in his speech. He used the word 'terrorist(s)' more than that. 'Terror' multiple times.

The rightwing myth about Obama refusing to call terrorism terrorism is more nutty than birtherism.

This post....a perfect example of you obfuscating.

I never said that he didn't target 'terrorism,' did I.

So....why would you imply that I did?
Isn't that the kind of thing you Leftists call 'a lie'?



He tried to shift the blame and hide the ones responsible for 99%+ of the world's terrorism....

....more smoke and mirrors than a fire in a brothel.

Where in that speech did he try to shift the blame in any terrorist act away from the people who actually committed the terrorism?

And, as we see by the no-answer,

the answer is 'nowhere'. Nowhere in the speech did Obama do any blameshifting of any kind,

which leads to the question...

why was this thread started to falsely accuse him of exactly that?

 

[NYcarbineer]

[


He tried to shift the blame and hide the ones responsible for 99%+ of the world's terrorism....

....more smoke and mirrors than a fire in a brothel.

Well, does ANYONE here want to try to back up the above claim?

Show us how the speech did any blameshifting or covering up of responsibility.

 

[PoliticalChic]

[


He tried to shift the blame and hide the ones responsible for 99%+ of the world's terrorism....

....more smoke and mirrors than a fire in a brothel.

Well, does ANYONE here want to try to back up the above claim?

Show us how the speech did any blameshifting or covering up of responsibility.

Who's "us"?

You and the worm in your pocket?


Why pretend that any others are as dishonorable as you are, and are also pretending not to see the sleight of hand by this charlatan?

Be brave, stand up alone.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This post....a perfect example of you obfuscating.

I never said that he didn't target 'terrorism,' did I.

So....why would you imply that I did?
Isn't that the kind of thing you Leftists call 'a lie'?



He tried to shift the blame and hide the ones responsible for 99%+ of the world's terrorism....

....more smoke and mirrors than a fire in a brothel.

Where in that speech did he try to shift the blame in any terrorist act away from the people who actually committed the terrorism?

And, as we see by the no-answer,

the answer is 'nowhere'. Nowhere in the speech did Obama do any blameshifting of any kind,

which leads to the question...

why was this thread started to falsely accuse him of exactly that?

Answered already....yet, like any 4-year-old mentality, you simply repeat.

 

[NYcarbineer]

[


He tried to shift the blame and hide the ones responsible for 99%+ of the world's terrorism....

....more smoke and mirrors than a fire in a brothel.

Well, does ANYONE here want to try to back up the above claim?

Show us how the speech did any blameshifting or covering up of responsibility.

Who's "us"?

You and the worm in your pocket?


Why pretend that any others are as dishonorable as you are, and are also pretending not to see the sleight of hand by this charlatan?

Be brave, stand up alone.

So far you're the only one who has claimed that Obama engaged in blameshifting in the speech and you can't provide one single shred of evidence to support that claim.

You're the one who's alone here; not even your yes-men will step up and support your nonsense this time.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Where in that speech did he try to shift the blame in any terrorist act away from the people who actually committed the terrorism?

And, as we see by the no-answer,

the answer is 'nowhere'. Nowhere in the speech did Obama do any blameshifting of any kind,

which leads to the question...

why was this thread started to falsely accuse him of exactly that?

Answered already....yet, like any 4-year-old mentality, you simply repeat.

No, you have not cited a single instance where the President shifted the blame for anything to anyone it did not belong to.

You can deny it as many times as you like.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And, as we see by the no-answer,

the answer is 'nowhere'. Nowhere in the speech did Obama do any blameshifting of any kind,

which leads to the question...

why was this thread started to falsely accuse him of exactly that?

Answered already....yet, like any 4-year-old mentality, you simply repeat.

No, you have not cited a single instance where the President shifted the blame for anything to anyone it did not belong to.

You can deny it as many times as you like.

Thanks for the option.....


If only I had this option, as well: Furca et Fossa

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

President Richard Nixon - “In any organization, the man at the top must bear the responsibility. That responsibility, therefore, belongs here in this office. I accept it.”




President Barack Hussein Obama - *crickets chirping*





Nixon was a crooked Son of a *****, yet he STILL had more integrity than this little boy who occupies the office at the present time.

Why didn't he take responsibility for Kent State and resign in 1970 then?

Because it was the Ohio NG, not the U.S. Army that shot the protesters... Good God man....