montelatici, et al,
This is a political move by do-gooders, soft hearted humanitarian that love lost puppies, and activist that advocate constant and continuous hand-outs to their parasitic populations. This is a population that cannot maintain law and order, who are in constant conflict with the adjacent state, and claim that they need the adjacent state to provide for their people because they cannot do for themselves; --- and a population that muster an administration with the prerequisite knowledge, skills and abilities to stand alone and effectively handle routine matters.
If ever there was a territory and a incapable people, described in Article 22 of the old LoN Covenant, it is the parasitic Palestinians that subsist on the donations provided by others, so that they can reap the benefits at the expense of others.
montelatici, et al,
And just what requires Israel to pay anything to a hostile nation?
Israel pays nothing to support the Palestinians, the EU, the UN and the US do. In fact, it often keeps the taxes Palestinians pay for themselves.
The Israelis make millions on the backs of the Palestinians.
The E.U. however, is threatening to make Israel pay for the occupation as occupiers have always done in the past.
"EU official threatens funding to PA, saying Israel should pay for its occupation -
“the EU cannot fund the Israeli occupation anymore. Israel needs to be responsible for its occupation. This means no more EU money to the PA.”
- See more at:
EU official threatens funding to PA, saying Israel should pay for its occupation
See more at:
EU official threatens funding to PA, saying Israel should pay for its occupation
(COMMENT)
All Israel has to do is handle Area "C" Areas "A" and "B" are the Palestinians responsibility.
If the Palestinians don't want US Aid, all they need to do is notify the US Ambassador in Israel.
Most Respectfully,
R
"Taking Care of the Civilian Population
Beyond the maintenance of law and order, Occupying Powers are responsible for the care of the civilian population, including its overall health and hygiene. In particular, the Occupying Power must, to the "fullest extent of the means available to it," ensure the population receives adequate food, water, and medical treatment; if supplies in the occupied territory are inadequate, foodstuffs and medical stores must be brought in. National Red Cross and Crescent societies, like the Iraqi Red Crescent Society, must be permitted to conduct humanitarian activities, a requirement that also applies to other relief agencies, such as those that maintain public utility services, distribute aid, and conduct rescue operations....."
Law of Belligerent Occupier
(COMMENT)
What I hear here, is a type of political coercion. The Palestinians are crying that someone must fund their Jihad. That they cannot carry on the seven decades of conflict if they do not get donors to suck dry, while they focus on the three No's. The parasitic Hostile Arab Palestinians want the Israelis to fund their insurgency against themselves.
There is no Rule of War --- or --- International Law / Binding Resolution that compels a nation under siege (Israel) to fund the conflict, hostilities, the insurgency and terrorism with a people that have pledged:
No peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, and no negotiations with Israel. (
Khartoum Resolution 1967) There is no Customary Law or International Law that compels Israel help fund or support a parasitic Hostile Arab Palestinian population that has made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition. (
Statement of 6 February 1948 Communicated to the Secretary-General by Mr. Isa Nakhleh, Representative of the Arab Higher Committee) There is nothing under International Humanitarian Law that compels Israel to even attempt to provide humanitarian assistance to a people that pledged hostilities to the death (The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out — man, woman and child.) Under what International Law are you going to use to compel Israel to provide direct support and assistance to:
"It is neither a controversial, nor a negotiable issue; it is, rather, dogmatic fundamental cause in struggle against Israel," said al-Zahhar, referring to armed resistance, pointing out that Israel has long sought to erase the Palestinian constants, concerning the Palestinian lands, Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa Mosque.
Al-Zahhar stressed that the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) refuses a Palestinian state within the 1967 or 1948 territories, saying "Our policy is Palestine, all of Palestine". He explained that Palestine as a whole is a part of the Islamic dogma that is derived from the Holy Qura'an.
Speaking of relations with the Islamic Jihad, al-Zahhar confirmed that both movements cooperate at political, security, military, and syndicate levels. Political leaders meet continuously, said al-Zahhar. At military level, there is a full coordination between Hamas and the Islamic Jihad, added he.
For More Visit Alresalah English
http://english.alresalah.ps/en/post.php?id=4702
Which International Law advocates the "terrorism to destroy Israel." Many people think that the UN denounces the advocacy of armed conflict and terrorism for any cause.
Abbas's Fatah Calls to Conquer Israel 'By Force'
By Ari Yashar, First Publish: 5/25/2015,
Fatah 'Nakba' messages call for terrorism as 'only' way to take entire state of Israel for its own, while showing off its terror branches.
Palestinian Authority (PA) Chairman Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah faction marked "Nakba" day - signifying the "catastrophe" of the establishment of the modern state of Israel - by calling for terrorism to destroy Israel and conquer the state as the "only" way.
What law allows for the continued funding of terrorist activities? I thought the Security Council passed a binding resolutions [
S/RES/1624 (2005)] that said:
1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:
(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;
Most Respectfully,
R
