A Nation Of Whisperers

[alang1216]

Free speech means free speech.

No it doesn't. Free speech means you have the right to say whatever you want so long as you don't infringe on anyone else's rights. I don't have the right to tell people that you like to fondle little boys since I can't prove it to be true. I can't call in a bomb threat if there is no bomb. If I yell fire in a crowded theater and someone dies, I can be prosecuted for manslaughter. In the real world (you should come visit sometime), EVERY right comes with restrictions on its use.

There is only one reason to restrict free speech.


Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Brandenburg_v

Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech ... as an abstract doctrine, could be punished under law consistent with the free speechclause.
Citations: 395 U.S. 444 (more‎)89 S. Ct. 1827; 23 ...‎
‎Background · ‎Decision · ‎Per curiam opinion · ‎Subsequent developments

The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action."[2][3]:702 Specifically, the Court struck down Ohio's criminal syndicalism statute, because that statute broadly prohibited the mere advocacy of violence. In the process, Whitney v. California (1927)[4] was explicitly overruled, and doubt was cast on Schenck v. United States (1919),[5] Abrams v. United States (1919),[6] Gitlow v. New York (1925),[7] and Dennis v. United States (1951).[8]

Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I am surprised that you don’t feel conspicuous, marching around in that brown shirt and the helmet with the spike on top….

Just admit you're a Fascist, and you will obey any orders and parrot any statement by your masters.

Was anything I wrote not 100% true?

Libel and slander are types of defamatory statements. Libel is a defamatory statement that is written. Slander is a defamatory statement that is oral. At common law, libel and slander were analyzed under different sets of standards, with libel recognized as the more serious wrong.

You're free to yell fire in a theatre so long as you're willing to face the legal consequences and claiming "free speech" is not a defense if someone dies.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Free speech means free speech.

No it doesn't. Free speech means you have the right to say whatever you want so long as you don't infringe on anyone else's rights. I don't have the right to tell people that you like to fondle little boys since I can't prove it to be true. I can't call in a bomb threat if there is no bomb. If I yell fire in a crowded theater and someone dies, I can be prosecuted for manslaughter. In the real world (you should come visit sometime), EVERY right comes with restrictions on its use.

There is only one reason to restrict free speech.


Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Brandenburg_v

Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech ... as an abstract doctrine, could be punished under law consistent with the free speechclause.
Citations: 395 U.S. 444 (more‎)89 S. Ct. 1827; 23 ...‎
‎Background · ‎Decision · ‎Per curiam opinion · ‎Subsequent developments

The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action."[2][3]:702 Specifically, the Court struck down Ohio's criminal syndicalism statute, because that statute broadly prohibited the mere advocacy of violence. In the process, Whitney v. California (1927)[4] was explicitly overruled, and doubt was cast on Schenck v. United States (1919),[5] Abrams v. United States (1919),[6] Gitlow v. New York (1925),[7] and Dennis v. United States (1951).[8]

Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I am surprised that you don’t feel conspicuous, marching around in that brown shirt and the helmet with the spike on top….

Just admit you're a Fascist, and you will obey any orders and parrot any statement by your masters.

Was anything I wrote not 100% true?

Libel and slander are types of defamatory statements. Libel is a defamatory statement that is written. Slander is a defamatory statement that is oral. At common law, libel and slander were analyzed under different sets of standards, with libel recognized as the more serious wrong.

You're free to yell fire in a theatre so long as you're willing to face the legal consequences and claiming "free speech" is not a defense if someone dies.

This is the sort of lie you Leftist are infamous for.

The sort of speech your sort is about stopping is political speech.



Please get lost.

 

[alang1216]

This is the sort of lie you Leftist are infamous for.

The sort of speech your sort is about stopping is political speech.

Please get lost.

So your sort advocates for lies, distortions, spin, and innuendos?

You are lost.

 

[PoliticalChic]

10. Whether they admit it or not, recent events clearly indicate that the overall ambition of owning and operating the media is to impose Marxism.

Nor was this a hidden objective.


"The ultimate objective of the new policy and of the activity of such an instrument of this policy as the Novosti Press Agency is not to learn more secrets about the adversary, and not even to teach the masses in the West in the spirit of Marxist-Leninist ideology, but to slowly replace the free-market capitalist society, with its individual freedoms in economic and socio-political spheres of life-- with a carbon copy of the “most progressive” system, and eventually merge into one world-wide system ruled by a benevolent bureaucracy which they call Socialism (or Communism, as the final and supreme stage of this “progress.”)

To effect this gradual change, it is much easier and less painful (and less noticeable for the populace) to change the perceptions of reality, attitudes, patterns of behavior and to create wide-spread demands and expectations, leading ultimately to the acceptance of totalitarianism.

Thus the media is the main target of manipulation by the KGB-controlled “independent, non-government, non-political, public organization” known as the Novosti Press Agency."
Yuri Bezmenov's (aka Tomas Schuman) World Thought Police.

World Thought Police: Part One

The following is a scan of Yuri Bezmenov's (aka Tomas Schuman) World Thought Police . Note: This book is probably the same as the book "No N...

uselessdissident.blogspot.com

Yuri Bezmenov worked as a "journalist" for Novosti Press Agency, which was a disinformation and propaganda agency controlled by the Soviet non-military intelligence agency (commonly known as the KGB).

So it was written.....and so it was done.