A Look at the Democrat Judge Who Sent a Mother to Prison for Trying to Feed Her Children

[Jake Winker Frogen]

Trump declared a "national emergency" on March 13 which gives the governors under the federalist system emergency powers.

Nothing gives anyone in government the authority to violate the Constitution, or to violate those rights of the people which the Constitution affirms.

Nothing.

The preamble of the Constitution states "promote the general welfare " this is a core function of government.

Just as the Bill of Rights does not mean you have a right to drive anyway you want, drunk or however you want because it violates the general welfare so opening up during a pandemic and endangering lives violates the general welfare.

 

[two_iron]

I just think it's hilarious that Ms Shelley can buy and sell it now with her GoFundMe money..... not that she would want to own that filthy piece of shit.

 

[tyroneweaver]

All she had to do was apologize for breaking the order and she could have gone free...There was an order on the city for the pandemic emergency with the punitive measures, nothing new during a national and state emergency. Just like when a tornado hits and people are ordered not to enter the area..

 

[Rigby5]

All she had o do was apologize for breaking the order and she could have gone free...There was an order on the city for the pandemic emergency with the punitive measures, nothing new during a national and state emergency. Just like when a tornado hits and people are ordered not to enter the area..

You’re the poster child for the ankle grabbers.

I didn't make the rules the Governor did along with the cities.......Beef it up with them...

I didn't see any rules on the ballot. I would have voted 'no.'

What ballot is that?

The ballot last November on voting day. Nothing about arresting people for working at their job.

Did you vote for a disaster to be declared? I didn't think so. Unless you can foretell the future. It's not what I would have done yet that is what those in charge did, so next time you don't vote for them.

Declaring a disaster is to that one can apply for federal disaster relief funds, and can not in any way violate basic right for no reason.
A governor is NOT a source of any authority, and can only act when necessary in order to defend the rights of other.
Which is NOT the case her.
Jailing the hair dresser served the rights of no one, so then clearly is totally illegal.

Again yes they can...

HENNING JACOBSON, Plff. in Err., v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.

www.law.cornell.edu

The authority of the state to enact this statute is to be referred to what is commonly called the police power,—a power which the state did not surrender when becoming a member of the Union under the Constitution. Although this court has refrained frained from any attempt to define the limits of that power, yet it has distinctly recognized the authority of a state to enact quarantine laws and 'health laws of every description;' indeed, all laws that relate to matters completely within its territory and which do not by their necessary operation affect the people of other states. According to settled principles, the police power of a state must be held to embrace, at least, such reasonable regulations established directly by legislative enactment as will protect the public health and the public safety

I disagree.
The state originally were empowered by royal decree, and this was vacated by joining the Union.
The Bill of Rights became supreme, which has since been recognized as putting individual rights over any state or federal authority.
The ONLY way any governing body or executive then gains the use of any authority is by borrowing it from the individuals whose rights it is protecting.

In your particular ruling it was about enforcing vaccinations to prevent smallpox deaths.
But the reality is that you do not need or want 100% vaccination.
All you need or want is herd immunity, which for smallpox is about 85% of the population.
Since some do die from vaccinations, then if you enforce 100% vaccination rates, you will be guilty of murder, deliberately causing some deaths for no reason at all.
So then the legislature had exceeded its authority, which did not come from the state existing before joining the union, but from the rights of the individual it was acting for.
The only time rights of any individual can be violated is when it conflicts with rights of a greater number of people.
And it did not.
Clearly there are many people who should NOT get any vaccination, such as those with compromised immune systems.
Forcing them to be vaccinated could kill them, for no reason, since herd immunity is satisfied with only around 85%.

 

[Rigby5]

Trump declared a "national emergency" on March 13 which gives the governors under the federalist system emergency powers.

Nothing gives anyone in government the authority to violate the Constitution, or to violate those rights of the people which the Constitution affirms.

Nothing.

The preamble of the Constitution states "promote the general welfare " this is a core function of government.

Just as the Bill of Rights does not mean you have a right to drive anyway you want, drunk or however you want because it violates the general welfare so opening up during a pandemic and endangering lives violates the general welfare.

How?
When an epidemic has already infiltrated the whole country, absolutely NOTHING good at all can be accomplished by a lock down, (except to prevent hospital flooding, which is not the case).
The reality is that "flattening the curve" is absolutely entirely the wrong thing to do and results in an unnecessarily larger death toll.
That is because herd immunity is the only way to stop infection or deaths, and absent a vaccine, that means acquired immunity.
So the more you slow down achieving herd immunity, the more unnecessary deaths.
With a lock down you can keep some virus alive, and keep the death toll going forever.
But by trying to accelerate herd immunity, you could deliberately infect 55% of the young and healthy, have only a couple thousand deaths, and have ended the whole epidemic in 2 weeks, way back in March.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

The preamble of the Constitution states "promote the general welfare " this is a core function of government.

No rational interpretation of the preamble authorized government in any way to violate the rules which the Constitution goes on to establish about what government may or may not do.

If the Preamble really meant what you are trying to force it to mean, then most of the rest of the Constitution would be pointless and irrelevant.

 

[Jake Winker Frogen]

The preamble of the Constitution states "promote the general welfare " this is a core function of government.

No rational interpretation of the preamble authorized government in any way to violate the rules which the Constitution goes on to establish about what government may or may not do.

If the Preamble really meant what you are trying to force it to mean, then most of the rest of the Constitution would be pointless and irrelevant.

No it would not, the Founding Fathers knew there can not be freedom in chaos, that freedom does not mean the individual does what ever they want when they want to all all conditions.


President Washington set the precedent during the Whiskey rebellion, that the government can restrict actives or tax them that it deems not in the national interest to leave unrestricted or taxed.

He actually used military power to enforce it.

Drafts during wartime restrict personal liberty more than any other act, far more so than just being asked not to be a selfish fuckwit and stay home to help save your fellow human being, they have been ruled over and over before the courts to be constitutional.

The income tax is an imposition on your economic freedom, ruled time and time again constitutional.


No where in the constitution does it state you can do anything you want when ever you want let alone during a national emergency.

 

[Jake Winker Frogen]

Trump declared a "national emergency" on March 13 which gives the governors under the federalist system emergency powers.

Nothing gives anyone in government the authority to violate the Constitution, or to violate those rights of the people which the Constitution affirms.

Nothing.

The preamble of the Constitution states "promote the general welfare " this is a core function of government.

Just as the Bill of Rights does not mean you have a right to drive anyway you want, drunk or however you want because it violates the general welfare so opening up during a pandemic and endangering lives violates the general welfare.

How?
When an epidemic has already infiltrated the whole country, absolutely NOTHING good at all can be accomplished by a lock down, (except to prevent hospital flooding, which is not the case).
The reality is that "flattening the curve" is absolutely entirely the wrong thing to do and results in an unnecessarily larger death toll.
That is because herd immunity is the only way to stop infection or deaths, and absent a vaccine, that means acquired immunity.
So the more you slow down achieving herd immunity, the more unnecessary deaths.
With a lock down you can keep some virus alive, and keep the death toll going forever.
But by trying to accelerate herd immunity, you could deliberately infect 55% of the young and healthy, have only a couple thousand deaths, and have ended the whole epidemic in 2 weeks, way back in March.

So you are saying the entire country is currently infected?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

No it would not, the Founding Fathers knew there can not be freedom in chaos, that freedom does not mean the individual does what ever they want when they want to all all conditions.

Right.

And that is why they crafted the Constitution as the supreme, highest law of the land, to establish the order by which government should operate.

It is ironic that you play the “law and order” card, in a pathetic and deceitful attempt to defend and advocate lawlessness and disorder on the part of government.

My guess is that you're so profoundly retarded, mentally ,that you don't even see the irreconcilable contradiction inherent in your position.

Government is not above the law, as you wish it to be.

The income tax is an imposition on your economic freedom, ruled time and time again constitutional.

You are aware of how the income tax was put into effect, aren't you? The only way that any previously unconstitutional power can legitimately be put into effect, by amending the Constitution itself to allow it.

No where in the constitution does it state you can do anything you want when ever you want let alone during a national emergency.

I never claimed that it does.

However, the Constitution does establish rules by which government is required to operate, and it establishes rights that the people have, which governments forbidden from violating.

And there is nothing anywhere in the Constitution that even hints at government having any legitimate authority to make up a fake crisis, like the to CoronaVirus hoax, and then use that fake crisis as a pretext on which to blatantly violate the rules and rights laid out in the Constitution. This is pretty much the definitive model of corruption and criminality in government, such that the great men who founded this country were trying to prevent.

 

[Jake Winker Frogen]

No it would not, the Founding Fathers knew there can not be freedom in chaos, that freedom does not mean the individual does what ever they want when they want to all all conditions.

Right.

And that is why they crafted the Constitution as the supreme, highest law of the land, to establish the order by which government should operate.

It is ironic that you play the “law and order” card, in a pathetic and deceitful attempt to defend and advocate lawlessness and disorder on the part of government.

My guess is that you're so profoundly retarded, mentally ,that you don't even see the irreconcilable contradiction inherent in your position.

Government is not above the law, as you wish it to be.

The income tax is an imposition on your economic freedom, ruled time and time again constitutional.

You are aware of how the income tax was put into effect, aren't you? The only way that any previously unconstitutional power can legitimately be put into effect, by amending the Constitution itself to allow it.

No where in the constitution does it state you can do anything you want when ever you want let alone during a national emergency.

I never claimed that it does.

However, the Constitution does establish rules by which government is required to operate, and it establishes rights that the people have, which governments forbidden from violating.

And there is nothing anywhere in the Constitution that even hints at government having any legitimate authority to make up a fake crisis, like the to CoronaVirus hoax, and then use that fake crisis as a pretext on which to blatantly violate the rules and rights laid out in the Constitution. This is pretty much the definitive model of corruption and criminality in government, such that the great men who founded this country were trying to prevent.

There is no need for a constitutional amendment, the power is clearly there under the general welfare clause, it always has been as the Washington knew and used.

It is not a fake crises, your own President declared a state of emergency.

The entire world, every nation in it has declared it to be a global crises too, both democracies and tyrannies.

Under a national emergency both state and federal government have the power to restrict certain activities.

They do under floods, hurricanes, war and so on.

Just because you want to go get a haircut does not mean you have a constitutional right to do so during a state of national emergency.

 

[Jake Winker Frogen]

But then your generation will not bare any burden, pay any price, or pretty much do anything for the good of your nation over all.

 

[Moonglow]

All she had o do was apologize for breaking the order and she could have gone free...There was an order on the city for the pandemic emergency with the punitive measures, nothing new during a national and state emergency. Just like when a tornado hits and people are ordered not to enter the area..

You’re the poster child for the ankle grabbers.

I didn't make the rules the Governor did along with the cities.......Beef it up with them...

I didn't see any rules on the ballot. I would have voted 'no.'

What ballot is that?

The ballot last November on voting day. Nothing about arresting people for working at their job.

Did you vote for a disaster to be declared? I didn't think so. Unless you can foretell the future. It's not what I would have done yet that is what those in charge did, so next time you don't vote for them.

Declaring a disaster is to that one can apply for federal disaster relief funds, and can not in any way violate basic right for no reason.
A governor is NOT a source of any authority, and can only act when necessary in order to defend the rights of other.
Which is NOT the case her.
Jailing the hair dresser served the rights of no one, so then clearly is totally illegal.

Again yes they can...

HENNING JACOBSON, Plff. in Err., v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.

www.law.cornell.edu

The authority of the state to enact this statute is to be referred to what is commonly called the police power,—a power which the state did not surrender when becoming a member of the Union under the Constitution. Although this court has refrained frained from any attempt to define the limits of that power, yet it has distinctly recognized the authority of a state to enact quarantine laws and 'health laws of every description;' indeed, all laws that relate to matters completely within its territory and which do not by their necessary operation affect the people of other states. According to settled principles, the police power of a state must be held to embrace, at least, such reasonable regulations established directly by legislative enactment as will protect the public health and the public safety

I disagree.
The state originally were empowered by royal decree, and this was vacated by joining the Union.
The Bill of Rights became supreme, which has since been recognized as putting individual rights over any state or federal authority.
The ONLY way any governing body or executive then gains the use of any authority is by borrowing it from the individuals whose rights it is protecting.

In your particular ruling it was about enforcing vaccinations to prevent smallpox deaths.
But the reality is that you do not need or want 100% vaccination.
All you need or want is herd immunity, which for smallpox is about 85% of the population.
Since some do die from vaccinations, then if you enforce 100% vaccination rates, you will be guilty of murder, deliberately causing some deaths for no reason at all.
So then the legislature had exceeded its authority, which did not come from the state existing before joining the union, but from the rights of the individual it was acting for.
The only time rights of any individual can be violated is when it conflicts with rights of a greater number of people.
And it did not.
Clearly there are many people who should NOT get any vaccination, such as those with compromised immune systems.
Forcing them to be vaccinated could kill them, for no reason, since herd immunity is satisfied with only around 85%.

You can disagree all you like it is the Supreme Court you have an issue with I have never made any ruling on any law, I am no judge.

 

[Moonglow]

But then your generation will not bare any burden, pay any price, or pretty much do anything for the good of your nation over all.

My sons will get a nice inheritance from me to pay for my share...

 

[Moonglow]

All she had to do was apologize for breaking the order and she could have gone free...There was an order on the city for the pandemic emergency with the punitive measures, nothing new during a national and state emergency. Just like when a tornado hits and people are ordered not to enter the area..

Wasn’t “the law” why kids were locked in cages in unsanitary conditions?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

There is no need for a constitutional amendment, the power is clearly there under the general welfare clause, it always has been as the Washington knew and used.

The general welfare clause grants no powers, it merely states general purpose. It most certainly does not grant any powers that override the rest of the rules explicitly laid out in the Constitution.

Just because you want to go get a haircut does not mean you have a constitutional right to do so during a state of national emergency.

It is not about haircuts.

It is about allowing people to go about their legitimate and necessary business, of working at their jobs,running their businesses, and generating the wealth that they and everyone else need to have generated, so that we may keep roofs over our heads, and food on our tables, and acquire all the other material things that we need to live.

Government absolutely does not have the authority to create a fake crisis, and then use that crisis as an excuse to interfere with this. Period.

Every public servant who is abusing his power to this end is a criminal of the worst sort, and deserves, if not to be put to death, to at least spend the rest of his worthless life in prison.

And I'd waste no outrage if all the useful idiots who support these criminals were made to share in that fate as well.

 

[Jake Winker Frogen]

There is no need for a constitutional amendment, the power is clearly there under the general welfare clause, it always has been as the Washington knew and used.

The general welfare clause grants no powers, it merely states general purpose. It most certainly does not grant any powers that override the rest of the rules explicitly laid out in the Constitution.

Just because you want to go get a haircut does not mean you have a constitutional right to do so during a state of national emergency.

It is not about haircuts.

It is about allowing people to go about their legitimate and necessary business, of working at their jobs,running their businesses, and generating the wealth that they and everyone else need to have generated, so that we may keep roofs over our heads, and food on our tables, and acquire all the other material things that we need to live.

Government absolutely does not have the authority to create a fake crisis, and then use that crisis as an excuse to interfere with this. Period.

Every public servant who is abusing his power to this end is a criminal of the worst sort, and deserves, if not to be put to death, to at least spend the rest of his worthless life in prison.

And I'd waste no outrage if all the useful idiots who support these criminals were made to share in that fate as well.

During World War Two a lot of men had to stop during their legitimate business and go fight, they had to sacrifice personality liberty for the greater good.

A few months of staying home to save your fellow man is no where near as great a sacrifice.

But they were they greatest generation and you are not.

 

[BS Filter]

All she had to do was apologize for breaking the order and she could have gone free...There was an order on the city for the pandemic emergency with the punitive measures, nothing new during a national and state emergency. Just like when a tornado hits and people are ordered not to enter the area..

So you support the fascist judge. You must be a Democrat like the judge is.

 

[Jake Winker Frogen]

No, I would not have locked her up as I said.

I would have allowed her to break a constitutional law and emergency power and when she kills somebody because of her self indulgent selfish nature charge with with manslaughter.

She is nothing more than a virus drunk driver, risking her fellow citizens lives.

 

[freyasman]

Now that all of the fascists have exposed themselves in the CV19 crap, it’s time to purge the fascists from America.

A Look At The Democrat Dallas Judge Who Jailed A Salon Owner

District Court Judge Eric Moye sentenced a Dallas salon owner to seven days in jail and ordered her to pay a $7,000 fine for violating lockdown orders.

thefederalist.com

Yeah okay..... but where does he live?

 

[freyasman]

All she had to do was apologize for breaking the order and she could have gone free...There was an order on the city for the pandemic emergency with the punitive measures, nothing new during a national and state emergency. Just like when a tornado hits and people are ordered not to enter the area..

He demanded she apologize for being "selfish" or he would have her thrown into a cage.

"Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to."

—Theodore Dalrymple, “Our Culture, What’s Left Of It”


Anyone who has trouble figuring out who is wrong here, is the reason so much is wrong here.