- Thread starter
- #21
Way, way, way too late!Is it too late to put Rush Limbaugh on the 20$ note?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Way, way, way too late!Is it too late to put Rush Limbaugh on the 20$ note?
The image of Aunt Jemima was a hard working, well groomed, smiling, black businesswoman.Well..just guessin' here..but maybe because one is a racial stereotype and the other an honor?So how is a black woman on a twenty okay, but on a syrup bottle racist?
I just don't understand the rules of Racial Victimization Poker.
Why?Way, way, way too late!Is it too late to put Rush Limbaugh on the 20$ note?
rich white people are a racial stereotypeWell..just guessin' here..but maybe because one is a racial stereotype and the other an honor?So how is a black woman on a twenty okay, but on a syrup bottle racist?
I just don't understand the rules of Racial Victimization Poker.
Killjoy!meh. . . they are going to crash the entire dollar denominated system with in the next decade or so, so I am not sure it matters much.
After that, it will all be electronic.
I'm not sure it matters.
Well..just guessin' here..but maybe because one is a racial stereotype and the other an honor?
We know that your first choice is David Duke.It should go to John Adams if anyone. A real patriot and Founding Father.
Lindsey Graham would be the better choice. You know the saying. “Queer as a $3 bill”.I was thinking Trump..for the three dollar bill...LOL!It should go to John Adams if anyone. A real patriot and Founding Father.
View attachment 458934
By the time "artists" with sharpies get done, the Tubbie will be out of circulation within six months if that long. There will be horns and moustaches, beards and any number of alterations. They won't be able to be spent of course. As you point out money counters won't recognize them. They will have to be returned to the bank. The bank ATMs won't be able to reuse them. Ohh it will be fun, Expensive but fun.As strange as this sounds asking, will optical money counters be able to recognize money with black people on it? Technology has a long track record of struggling with the color black, from facial recognition software to plastic recycling sorters.
By the time "artists" with sharpies get done, the Tubbie will be out of circulation within six months if that long. There will be horns and moustaches, beards and any number of alterations. They won't be able to be spent of course. As you point out money counters won't recognize them. They will have to be returned to the bank. The bank ATMs won't be able to reuse them. Ohh it will be fun, Expensive but fun.
They'll print trillion dollar bills with Janet Yellen's mug on them. And it will still take a wheelbarrow full of them to buy a 6-pack of beer.meh. . . they are going to crash the entire dollar denominated system with in the next decade or so, so I am not sure it matters much.
After that, it will all be electronic.
I'm not sure it matters.
No, it is her intention to deface currency.By the time "artists" with sharpies get done, the Tubbie will be out of circulation within six months if that long. There will be horns and moustaches, beards and any number of alterations. They won't be able to be spent of course. As you point out money counters won't recognize them. They will have to be returned to the bank. The bank ATMs won't be able to reuse them. Ohh it will be fun, Expensive but fun.
Is this your lie for February 18th?
meh. . . they are going to crash the entire dollar denominated system with in the next decade or so, so I am not sure it matters much.
After that, it will all be electronic.
I'm not sure it matters.
Looks like old Andy Jackson is getting the boot!
Opinion | A Harriet Tubman $20? That’s Just the Beginning
America once had a wide-open approach to currency. Maybe that’s due for a revival.www.politico.com
Less than a week after taking office, the Biden administration announced it would restart Obama-era plans to redesign the $20 bill, replacing the portrait of President Andrew Jackson with that of abolitionist Harriet Tubman, after more than four years of uncertainty about the note’s future. The decision has revived a fervent debate about who belongs on our currency, and whether the change is just another example of so-called cancel culture at its worst.
It’s not hard to understand why some Americans might see the redesign as a radical break from tradition. For the past century, U.S. banknotes have featured a static set of Founding Fathers and presidents, government buildings and national memorials. This 20th-century consistency created the illusion that significant design alterations would sever our currency’s ties to its past.
But this is a misperception. In the 1800s, currency redesigns were not at all uncommon. In fact, banknotes changed regularly, and featured a vibrant range of people, scenes and symbols. The United States did not have standardized designs depicting only a handful of political figures until the 1920s.
What this history suggests is that we should not shy away from rethinking our currency today. Instead, the new $20 bill should be merely a starting point, encouraging us to think more expansively and creatively about the images that appear on our money—as we have in our past and as other nations do today.
Money, after all, is a powerful means of communication. It is a missive we send around the world—an ambassador of sorts. It is also part of our national identity and can help to remind us of our common purpose. Our money should not only reflect our country’s origins, but also who we have become over the past 250 years—as well as who we aspire to be.
Yeah...I heard. Going to take a page out of the left's handbook and get a Andrew Jackson stamp to stamp over Harriet.