I believe a lawsuit on those grounds would fail. There's not a single thing in the 2nd Amendment which dictates that a person should be able to procure a gun from a conveniently located dealer. You might think that's a silly thing to rely on, but I would challenge you to prove me wrong...
Dictates? Really? How about, shall not be infringed. Conveniently is a subjective- based on your perception.
The 2nd amendment, are the rules for the rule writers- that they either can't comprehend simple English, or they're just plain stupid, or have nefarious purposes in mind speaks to the lack of proper education in this Country- which, BTW, dictates and enFORCEs, through coercion, school bullshit which leads right back to this conversation. Show me where, in ANY constitution in this Country that grants an official the authority to make one more essential than another- after you look up the definition of essential- which is what this is about, not, the 2nd amendment which clearly states the rules- any half ass lawyer would rip a prosecutor to legal shreds-
A gun store is not "essential."
Your opinion is noted - however, you nor anyone else has that authority, never mind the right to make that determination- in fact- is is "
essential" (words mean things) to the exerciser- the only needs in life are air, water, food, shelter and clothing with the last two being optional- it is
essential, to Liberty, (and those dependent on providers) that wants, needs and desires are not determined by some pin headed idiot educated beyond their intellect- however, it is "essential" (of extreme importance) to those dependent on the vendor of services or goods that he provide those to them- it's not the place of gov't to do that. It is NOwhere in the constitution and I've yet to see it from a State constitution.