A few negative issues with President Trump

[BackAgain]

Relax, BackFlush.

Sit down Fumblin’ Dickweed. You’re making an even bigger twat rash of yourself.

Meanwhile, anything Trump tries is automatically denigrated by vermin shit bags like you.

Objectivity ain’t your strong suit. You don’t have any strong suits.

 

[White 6]

.

Cat food cab cost more than beans and rice ... They should be better shoppers ...

.​

Aw, they should choose between food to keep them alive vs overpriced drugs to keep them alive? I can't support that. It just isn't right and doesn't have to be that way, as pharmaceutical profits have been up, even with some controls on price.

 

[BlackSand]

Aw, they should choose between food to keep them alive vs overpriced drugs to keep them alive? I can't support that. It just isn't right and doesn't have to be that way, as pharmaceutical profits have been up, even with some controls on price.

.

No ... I said they should choose better food than cat food ...
And save some money ...

Of course ... You might not understand that ...
There's a lot more 'feelings' involved ... If you just say they are stupid enough to eat cat food ...
Which might actually go further into explaining why they cannot pay their bills ...

.​

 

[Natural Citizen]

.

No ... I said they should choose better food than cat food ...
And save some money ...

Of course ... You might not understand that ...
There's a lot more 'feelings' involved ... If you just say they are stupid enough to eat cat food ...
Which might actually go further into explaining why they cannot pay their bills ...

.​

Bring back the funny and agree button.


Gawldangit...

 

[Natural Citizen]

I don't even know if I believe that whole thing about people eating cat food.

 

[BlackSand]

I don't even know if I believe that whole thing about people eating cat food.

.

Well ... If you add a little Critical Theory and Class Warfare ...
Then it can be someone else's fault ...

.​

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

That’s not a refutation. You moron.

None. So, nobody to ask.

How did you prove that he did not sexually abuse Jean Carroll? May I see the proof?

 

[hadit]

Can't escape being in favor of Trump with supporting this. He campaigned on it. Can't separate from it.

Be sure to let us know when you find a political candidate with whom you agree totally, 100%, absolutely no differences. And they can't be yourself.

 

[Natural Citizen]

.

Well ... If you add a little Critical Theory and Class Warfare ...
Then it can be someone else's fault ...

.​

Blech...Frankfurt Marxists...gag me with a spoon...

Think there may have been a fairly decent discussion on that around here some place, probably a thread from years ago, though. An dmost of those posters are probably long gone by now.

That's back when we used to have semi-decent threads and conversation.

These days it's like a game of tag, teee hee heee heee heee, you're it...dumb shit...

 

[BackAgain]

How did you prove that he did not sexually abuse Jean Carroll? May I see the proof?

I don’t recall claiming proof about that. Care to provide me with the actual “quote” and link?

Nah. I didn’t think so.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

I don’t recall claiming proof about that. Care to provide me with the actual “quote” and link?

Of course, see your own post above #104:

How did you prove there were no sexual abuse victims? (or is that simply a belief you hold?)

Nah. I didn’t think so.

 

[BackAgain]

Of course, see your own post above #104:

View attachment 1086303
As I said. Nobody to ask. Just because you buy a civil jury verdict from a poisonous deep blue state, doesn’t mean he ever did anything.

Damn, you’re stuoid.

How did you prove there were no sexual abuse victims? (or is that simply a belief you hold?)

As I said. I never claimed to have any proof. Not ever.

But, of course I don’t believe the claim from that shithead plaintiff.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Damn, you’re stuoid.

At least I can spell "stupid".

As I said. I never claimed to have any proof. Not ever.

Oh, I assumed you had seen proof that nobody was sexually abused by Trump, I see now it was just idle waffle and it is just misogyny that leads you to make the claim. You know saying X is true when you are unable to prove X is true is called guessing?

But, of course I don’t believe the claim from that shithead plaintiff.

But no proof, yes I get it now.

Later Big Ass.

 

[BackAgain]

At least I can spell "stupid".

Ah. Good one. A typo! I’m proud of you.

Oh, I assumed

You just assumed too much. As usual.

But no proof, yes I get it now.

It would ordinarily be very difficult to “prove” a negative.

You “get” very little in life.

 

[Clipper]

Among the most outspoken was former Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (Kentucky), who told Semafor: “No one should excuse violence. And particularly violence against police officers.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy (Louisiana) offered similar comments, telling reporters, “People who assault police officers, if they do the crime, they should do the time.”

“I’m disappointed to see that, and I do fear the message that is sent to these great men and women that stood by us,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) said, referring to the Capitol Police officers who were assaulted.

Sen. Thom Tillis (North Carolina) added: “Anybody who is convicted of assault on a police officer, I can’t get there, at all. I think it was a bad idea.”

Plenty of other Republicans didn’t seem to want to engage or offered muted responses.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (South Dakota) said he was not “looking backwards” and claimed the blanket pardons were actually done on a case-by-case basis. Sen. Susan Collins (Maine) indicated she was unfamiliar with the pardons but would disagree with them if they were for violent offenders. Sen. John Cornyn (Texas) emphasized that it was Trump’s prerogative.

But perhaps most remarkably, some even approved:

• Sen. Ron Johnson (Wisconsin) told Fox News that he didn’t want to pardon violent offenders but that the Justice Department’s handling of the cases made him fully supportive.
• Sen. Tommy Tuberville (Alabama) said that he was “100 percent” for all of the pardons and that the defendants had served enough time. When pressed on those who assaulted police, Tuberville said that was “not acceptable” but that he “didn’t see” the video.
• Sen. Jim Banks (Indiana) added that it was a “disgrace how all of these people were treated” and said that because Trump had previewed his plans and won the election, his action was justified.

Someday, Trump will be exposed for the traiterous lowlife that he is, & the bastard himself will be begging for a pardon along with the scum like Vance who enabled him.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

1. I was and I remain a Trump supporter.

2. Reasonable people can and do have differing views on some matters.

3. But that doesn’t give even a good man like Trump a totally free ride free from criticism. So, in that spirit, I think this thread can fairly list the things I want him to undo where he can:

A. Too late on the J6 pardons. But, while I support most of those pardons, I disapprove of the pardons of any J6 defendant who committed any act of violence against anyone.

B. Using an EO to attempt to ignite legal actions regarding the so-called “birthright” citizenship of the kids born here to illegal alien moms (or moms and dads) may be an effective way to get the ball rolling. But I’d prefer fewer EOs and much greater reliance on Congressional legislation.

C. To undo the damage caused by ex-President Biden’s policies and EO’s, I do applaud President Trump’s use of so many EO’s. But, I see no reason in this modern high tech Information age why the full text of each of his EO’s can’t be posted at his WH web site within moments of his signing them.

Congress and such need to re-write the birthright BS to be the mother or father must be a citizen, if not just the mother. Illegals take advantage of it as is. So much for the wisdom of our founding fathers, but wait, that was added in 1868, when a Confederate/Democrat/Slave-Loving Johnson was POTUS after talking out Lincoln.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Someday, Trump will be exposed for the traiterous lowlife that he is, & the bastard himself will be begging for a pardon along with the scum like Vance who enabled him.

Why don't you ever tire of saying stupid shit to be proven wrong over and over again, each and every day? It's like your comfort zone is a great big lie.

Do the Democrats pitch you a dime every time you write this crap?

 

[toobfreak]

Bring back the funny and agree button.

 

[BackAgain]

Congress and such need to re-write the birthright BS to be the mother or father must be a citizen, if not just the mother. Illegals take advantage of it as is. So much for the wisdom of our founding fathers, but wait, that was added in 1868, when a Confederate/Democrat/Slave-Loving Johnson was POTUS after talking out Lincoln.

Trump wrote an EO.

EVERYONE knows that it will get litigated. This means that SCOTUS may well figure out that “birthright” citizenship for kids born here to illegal aliens has no Constitutional basis.

 

[toobfreak]

EVERYONE knows that it will get litigated. This means that SCOTUS may well figure out that “birthright” citizenship for kids born here to illegal aliens has no Constitutional basis.

Do you want to know my peeve issues with Trump?

1. It wouldn't hurt him to go on a diet and lose 25 pounds. Do it for your wife, dude.
2. Maybe then, he would sit up straighter and not always lean forward.
3. Stop scowling so much. Don't look so serious.
4. Stop mentioning that the war in Ukraine would never have happened had you been president in 2022. We got it the first 35 times he pointed it out.