Mac1958
Diamond Member
Yeah, I didn't think so.I don't need to you chose daily on here to support progressives and to attack conservatives.
<flick>
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, I didn't think so.I don't need to you chose daily on here to support progressives and to attack conservatives.
we know you attack every aspect of the republican party and constantly defend the left ... what more do we need to know ??Always so nasty and personal.
You don't know my politics, but don't let that stop you.
Yuck.
Wrong.we know you attack every aspect of the republican party and constantly defend the left ... what more do we need to know ??
You've bought in to the trumpian lie which basically says............"I'm nominating someone who couldn't handle running two tiny partisan vet groups without being accused of sexual harassment and let go for mismanaging funds, to run the biggest agency in the US government so he can deal with the fictitious deep state equivalent inside the DoD."Cleaning out incompetent woke fools at the Pentagon improves national defense
yes we do we have seen you side constantly with progressives and attack Conservatives.
98.6% of what dickhead Mac1958 posts here is deranged speculation about da Eebil Orange Man or saying those who voted for Trump (which is a majority of Americans) are dumb and he's smarter because he is anti-that. (everything)Then I'm sure it will be easy for you to provide two or three progressive positions I hold on the actual issues.
Be the first. Go ahead.
![]()
Same. Earbuds and CSpan are a thing.I work for a living!
You bought into the Biderer lie that Lloyd Austin was "qualified" because he was a DIE hire. List for us the specific qualifications required for Sec. Def.You've bought in to the trumpian lie which basically says............"I'm nominating someone who couldn't handle running two tiny partisan vet groups without being accused of sexual harassment and let go for mismanaging funds, to run the biggest agency in the US government so he can deal with the fictitious deep state equivalent inside the DoD."
Lie thar
NOTHING in his background suggests he is qualified to run a hotdog stand.
Sheesh, Duke. After that shredding, there won't be enough of ole' Mac left to sweep up into a dustpan.98.6% of what dickhead Mac1958 posts here is deranged speculation about da Eebil Orange Man or saying those who voted for Trump (which is a majority of Americans) are dumb and he's smarter because he is anti-that.
Sorry Mac, you're wrong. You're thick as a brick, and probably some kind of government plant here to sow discord like Golfing Gator. Fuck Off, you broken record shitbird.
The Mac1958 schtick, it's old. Past its 10th birthday.Sheesh, Duke. After that shredding, there won't be enough of ole' Mac left to sweep up into a dustpan.![]()
If you were president, would you allow people into your administration that you believe will undermine your entire administration? You wouldn't. Would you?Sure. That's why he wants to gut all government positions and replace them with blind loyalists, why he wants to destroy the press, why he wants to bring down the justice and judicial systems.
He doesn't want to be held accountable.
The world has seen it before, and it's all playing out again, in real time, right in front of us.
Only the committee chairman and the ranking member can see the BGC, so it's debatable how much the Democrats know about the BGC.Democrats Say F.B.I. Did Not Interview Critical Witnesses About Pete Hegseth
Senate Democrats on Monday said that an F.B.I. background check on Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald J. Trump’s pick to lead the Pentagon, omitted key details on major allegations against him, in part because it did not include interviews with critical witnesses.
One missed opportunity came when the bureau did not interview one of Mr. Hegseth’s ex-wives before its findings were presented to senators last week, according to people familiar with the bureau’s investigation.
“My understanding is that some of them would like to be contacted by the F.B.I. investigative team, or the vetters, and they have not been talked to,” Ms. Duckworth added in the MSNBC interview.
A spokeswoman for the F.B.I. declined to comment.
Mr. Trump's transition team commissioned the F.B.I. background check on Mr. Hegseth last month after initially floating the idea of hiring private contractors to look into the president-elect’s cabinet picks. As the client, presidential transition teams are traditionally able to set the parameters for background checks into cabinet picks, and potentially dictate which witnesses are interviewed and what questions are asked. The transition team’s directions to the F.B.I. for its investigation of Mr. Hegseth are unknown.
![]()
Democrats Say F.B.I. Did Not Interview Critical Witnesses About Pete Hegseth
The bureau did not interview an ex-wife of President-elect Donald J. Trump’s pick for defense secretary before the findings on his background check were presented to senators.www.nytimes.com
Just like.........
Report says Trump White House obstructed FBI probe into allegations against Kavanaugh
![]()
Report says Trump White House obstructed FBI probe into allegations against Kavanaugh
The Senate report is a damning rebuke to Trump’s claim he gave the FBI “free rein” to investigate sexual misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh.www.msnbc.com
For her part, Sen. Duckworth has noted Dems were not given the same access to Hegseth as Repubs prior to today's hearing.
Duckworth: Trump’s Pentagon pick has less experience than Applebee’s manager
Duckworth held the press call to lay out her concerns about Trump’s nominee, insisting that her objections to Hegseth aren’t motivated by politics but by what his confirmation would mean for national security.
She complained that Sen. Jack Reed (R.I.), the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, will likely be the only Senate Democrat who will meet with Hegseth before his hearing.
Duckworth also noted that rank-and-file Democrats on the Armed Services panel may not have a chance to fully review the FBI background check on the nominee, an investigation Democrats believe will be critical to assess a sexual assault allegation from 2017 and alleged mismanagement of Concerned Veterans for America (CVA), an advocacy group.
Can anyone think of a reason why trump's transition team would limit the scope of Hegseth's background check as his WH limited the scope of Kavanaugh's? Are they trying to hide his lack of qualifications for the job, his heavy drinking, his abuse of women, his mismanagement of funds for the partisan vets organizations he ran, the reasons he was let go by them, or his bizarre statements on everything from women to religion?
So anyone who doesn't mindlessly and obediently toe the line is "undermining an entire administration".If you were president, would you allow people into your administration that you believe will undermine your entire administration? You wouldn't. Would you?
You best reply is HITLER!?That's your best reply?
Obviously, you can't refute what I stated.
You lose!
Thanks for playing, LOSER!
NOTHING in his background suggests he is qualified to run a hotdog stand.You've bought in to the trumpian lie which basically says............"I'm nominating someone who couldn't handle running two tiny partisan vet groups without being accused of sexual harassment and let go for mismanaging funds, to run the biggest agency in the US government so he can deal with the fictitious deep state equivalent inside the DoD."
NOTHING in his background suggests he is qualified to run a hotdog stand.
Sounds like a Xiden Admin problem. He runs the FBI. Guess the dems are pissed they didn't make up enough stuff about himDemocrats Say F.B.I. Did Not Interview Critical Witnesses About Pete Hegseth
Senate Democrats on Monday said that an F.B.I. background check on Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald J. Trump’s pick to lead the Pentagon, omitted key details on major allegations against him, in part because it did not include interviews with critical witnesses.
One missed opportunity came when the bureau did not interview one of Mr. Hegseth’s ex-wives before its findings were presented to senators last week, according to people familiar with the bureau’s investigation.
“My understanding is that some of them would like to be contacted by the F.B.I. investigative team, or the vetters, and they have not been talked to,” Ms. Duckworth added in the MSNBC interview.
A spokeswoman for the F.B.I. declined to comment.
Mr. Trump's transition team commissioned the F.B.I. background check on Mr. Hegseth last month after initially floating the idea of hiring private contractors to look into the president-elect’s cabinet picks. As the client, presidential transition teams are traditionally able to set the parameters for background checks into cabinet picks, and potentially dictate which witnesses are interviewed and what questions are asked. The transition team’s directions to the F.B.I. for its investigation of Mr. Hegseth are unknown.
![]()
Democrats Say F.B.I. Did Not Interview Critical Witnesses About Pete Hegseth
The bureau did not interview an ex-wife of President-elect Donald J. Trump’s pick for defense secretary before the findings on his background check were presented to senators.www.nytimes.com
Just like.........
Report says Trump White House obstructed FBI probe into allegations against Kavanaugh
![]()
Report says Trump White House obstructed FBI probe into allegations against Kavanaugh
The Senate report is a damning rebuke to Trump’s claim he gave the FBI “free rein” to investigate sexual misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh.www.msnbc.com
For her part, Sen. Duckworth has noted Dems were not given the same access to Hegseth as Repubs prior to today's hearing.
Duckworth: Trump’s Pentagon pick has less experience than Applebee’s manager
Duckworth held the press call to lay out her concerns about Trump’s nominee, insisting that her objections to Hegseth aren’t motivated by politics but by what his confirmation would mean for national security.
She complained that Sen. Jack Reed (R.I.), the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, will likely be the only Senate Democrat who will meet with Hegseth before his hearing.
Duckworth also noted that rank-and-file Democrats on the Armed Services panel may not have a chance to fully review the FBI background check on the nominee, an investigation Democrats believe will be critical to assess a sexual assault allegation from 2017 and alleged mismanagement of Concerned Veterans for America (CVA), an advocacy group.
Can anyone think of a reason why trump's transition team would limit the scope of Hegseth's background check as his WH limited the scope of Kavanaugh's? Are they trying to hide his lack of qualifications for the job, his heavy drinking, his abuse of women, his mismanagement of funds for the partisan vets organizations he ran, the reasons he was let go by them, or his bizarre statements on everything from women to religion?
98.6% of what dickhead Mac1958 posts here is deranged speculation about da Eebil Orange Man or saying those who voted for Trump (which is a majority of Americans) are dumb and he's smarter because he is anti-that. (everything)
Sorry Mac, you're wrong. You're thick as a brick, and probably some kind of government plant here to sow discord like Golfing Gator. Fuck Off, you broken record shitbird.
Pothole Pete, anyone?NOTHING in his background suggests he is qualified to run a hotdog stand.
That never stopped democrats from making appointments
Its not a bad place to startPothole Pete, anyone?
Leftists are sick bastards and the country would be much better off without them.