The2ndAmendment
Gold Member
The OP needs to get laid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The human is a sickly animal, and brutal, monolithic authoritarianism is the only possible means to its salvation. Humanity is largely a group of cowards and crooks that only serve to maim and distort anything that may be considered good or just when they are allowed to function as free actors. The ideal occurrence would be for humanity to extinguish itself in an orgy of murder/suicide, but at exhilarating as it would be to see the streets of every city run red, and as brilliantly and brightly that the new society of worthwhile human animals would function, most of humanity actually believe (incredibly!) that they are of BENEFIT to themselves and others.
Since humanity is too idiotic to even recognize what evil creatures they are, let alone take steps to rectify the problem (i.e., mass murder and suicide), I advocate strict meritocratic fascism. Global society should be ruled by a group of maleficent dictators, handing down iron-clad edicts, violations of which to be punished by public torture and death.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have broken this essay into many separate parts for both the ease of the reader and to guard against a banning. The next section will define some of my basic terms, delve further into the plans for an optimal society, and will set forth a brief introduction into plans to greatly reduce the world's population, starting will the elimination of fertility in women, to be replaced by asexual fertilization of only a very select group of females.

All humans will have their minds and bodies judged on a set of objective criterion. Those found wanting will work the fields or serve their betters in some other way.
Another idiot who thinks others are as worthless as they are. To judge all humans based on their own lack of substance and intelligence is typical. And they want to be ruled over with an iron fist by someone equally demented.
How about a neg rep for such stupidity?
All humans will have their minds and bodies judged on a set of objective criterion. Those found wanting will work the fields or serve their betters in some other way. This will be discussed later at much length.

Another idiot who thinks others are as worthless as they are. To judge all humans based on their own lack of substance and intelligence is typical. And they want to be ruled over with an iron fist by someone equally demented.
How about a neg rep for such stupidity?
All humans will have their minds and bodies judged on a set of objective criterion. Those found wanting will work the fields or serve their betters in some other way. This will be discussed later at much length.
Do you mean betters or bettors.
Or bitters?![]()

All humans will have their minds and bodies judged on a set of objective criterion. Those found wanting will work the fields or serve their betters in some other way. This will be discussed later at much length.
Do you mean betters or bettors.
Or bitters?![]()
![]()
Carry on.
You do however know that fascism is a rather loaded term eh?
I do. I want to show my work to the highest volume of posters that I can. You could substitute that word for "Brutally severe authoritarian meritocracy" if you want.
I'm afraid we're getting a bit sidetracked.
Not entirely. I left you a couple of questions back a page. And is there a version of fascism, German, Italian, or Japanese, that you believe aligns well with yours?
Go to hell and suck Hitler's tiny cock you nazi bastard.Carry on.
You do however know that fascism is a rather loaded term eh?
I do. I want to show my work to the highest volume of posters that I can. You could substitute that word for "Brutally severe authoritarian meritocracy" if you want.
I'm afraid we're getting a bit sidetracked.
Do you mean betters or bettors.
Or bitters?![]()
Go to hell and suck Hitler's tiny cock you nazi bastard.I do. I want to show my work to the highest volume of posters that I can. You could substitute that word for "Brutally severe authoritarian meritocracy" if you want.
I'm afraid we're getting a bit sidetracked.
I am certainly not a Nazi. For one, I hold that all races are equally evil.
Another idiot who thinks others are as worthless as they are. To judge all humans based on their own lack of substance and intelligence is typical. And they want to be ruled over with an iron fist by someone equally demented.
How about a neg rep for such stupidity?
All humans will have their minds and bodies judged on a set of objective criterion. Those found wanting will work the fields or serve their betters in some other way. This will be discussed later at much length.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Mr. H. again.The human is a sickly animal, and brutal, monolithic authoritarianism is the only possible means to its salvation. Humanity is largely a group of cowards and crooks that only serve to maim and distort anything that may be considered good or just when they are allowed to function as free actors. The ideal occurrence would be for humanity to extinguish itself in an orgy of murder/suicide, but at exhilarating as it would be to see the streets of every city run red, and as brilliantly and brightly that the new society of worthwhile human animals would function, most of humanity actually believe (incredibly!) that they are of BENEFIT to themselves and others.
Since humanity is too idiotic to even recognize what evil creatures they are, let alone take steps to rectify the problem (i.e., mass murder and suicide), I advocate strict meritocratic fascism. Global society should be ruled by a group of maleficent dictators, handing down iron-clad edicts, violations of which to be punished by public torture and death.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have broken this essay into many separate parts for both the ease of the reader and to guard against a banning. The next section will define some of my basic terms, delve further into the plans for an optimal society, and will set forth a brief introduction into plans to greatly reduce the world's population, starting will the elimination of fertility in women, to be replaced by asexual fertilization of only a very select group of females.
...says the sickly animal posting away on his hydrocarbon enriched computer powered by hydrocarbons.
Let me guess- you live totally off the grid. Amiright?![]()
Well, you may be desirous of a Dictatorial Meritocracy but it certainly won't be Fascist one under those conditions. What you'll have is Rome, which did very well for a very long time, but it had both internal and external enemies. For glory there must be victory, and for that you need conflict. You might try reading up on Leo Strauss. He can guide you on the necessity of an enemy, and faith.I do. I want to show my work to the highest volume of posters that I can. You could substitute that word for "Brutally severe authoritarian meritocracy" if you want.
I'm afraid we're getting a bit sidetracked.
Not entirely. I left you a couple of questions back a page. And is there a version of fascism, German, Italian, or Japanese, that you believe aligns well with yours?
Oh, I see that you edited some questions on to a post that I had already quoted. Well, not really a question as much as a random amalgamation of words. I believe you are asking me how the following subjects would be treated in my society:
Faith: Religious faith is a harmful delusion and would be violently stamped out wherever it is found. Hopefully we would instill a faith-like devotion to the Government of the Superiors. This seems plausible given the typical brain chemistry (namely, the similarity to the feeling of romantic love) that occurs in the religious.
Nationalism: Ideally, all nations (defined as political boundaries) would be dissolved. In terms of personal devotion to the state, well, we'd certainly hope to foster that in any Inferior.
Enemies: The primary enemy of the average citizen would certainly be placed on the very same brutal ruling force that is greatly restricting their freedom! However, a massive military presence will be omnipresent throughout society to stamp out any hint of rebellion. Said military personnel will be heavily incentivized to carry out their duty. The particular incentives are universal; money, power, sex.
To answer your current question: not particularly.
For now, I will no longer tease later installments of my work. Part 2 should appear in this forum within 4 hours.
Another idiot who thinks others are as worthless as they are. To judge all humans based on their own lack of substance and intelligence is typical. And they want to be ruled over with an iron fist by someone equally demented.
How about a neg rep for such stupidity?
All humans will have their minds and bodies judged on a set of objective criterion. Those found wanting will work the fields or serve their betters in some other way. This will be discussed later at much length.
I do. I want to show my work to the highest volume of posters that I can. You could substitute that word for "Brutally severe authoritarian meritocracy" if you want.
I'm afraid we're getting a bit sidetracked.
Not entirely. I left you a couple of questions back a page. And is there a version of fascism, German, Italian, or Japanese, that you believe aligns well with yours?
Oh, I see that you edited some questions on to a post that I had already quoted. Well, not really a question as much as a random amalgamation of words. I believe you are asking me how the following subjects would be treated in my society:
Faith: Religious faith is a harmful delusion and would be violently stamped out wherever it is found. Hopefully we would instill a faith-like devotion to the Government of the Superiors. This seems plausible given the typical brain chemistry (namely, the similarity to the feeling of romantic love) that occurs in the religious.
Nationalism: Ideally, all nations (defined as political boundaries) would be dissolved. In terms of personal devotion to the state, well, we'd certainly hope to foster that in any Inferior.
Enemies: The primary enemy of the average citizen would certainly be placed on the very same brutal ruling force that is greatly restricting their freedom! However, a massive military presence will be omnipresent throughout society to stamp out any hint of rebellion. Said military personnel will be heavily incentivized to carry out their duty. The particular incentives are universal; money, power, sex.
To answer your current question: not particularly.
For now, I will no longer tease later installments of my work. Part 2 should appear in this forum within 4 hours.