I don't know why. You don't seem to know anything about this subject.No. I'm absolutely certain. I'm just not going to set myself on fire to prove it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know why. You don't seem to know anything about this subject.No. I'm absolutely certain. I'm just not going to set myself on fire to prove it.
Exactly. That you don't even know about orbital forcing makes your steadfast belief that life on earth will end in 30 years astonishing.Orbital forcing? What in the hell are you talking about. On second thought, don't tell me.
I am speaking to you. In that, I am speaking to a dead person. If you are planning on living past about 30 years from now, make other plans. Because you and most of the life on Earth is going to be dead. That inescapable fact is something worth setting yourself on fire to bring attention to.
I think you are vastly under estimating the distribution. If what you say were true that would mean almost everyone is under the control of media advertising. For that to be true we would see everyone buying the same product. We don't see that. We don't see anything close to that.You would be that rarest of humans. There's an entire science of advertising that manipulates you in ways you don't even know.
I think you are vastly under estimating the distribution. If what you say were true that would mean almost everyone is under the control of media advertising. For that to be true we would see everyone buying the same product. We don't see that. We don't see anything close to that.
How ironic, he contributed to MMGW by lighting himself on fire. What a fool.In a protest against human caused global warming, Wynn Bruce set himself on fire on the steps of the Supreme Court.
Your idea off history is flawed at best. Next, what we are doing is the opposite of sustainability. Infinite growth is itself unsustainable. Such as population growth is unsustainable. The population growth of latino countries is unsustainable. They breed like bacteria. Like a cancerous growth. Letting them invade our country is no solution to that problem. Any "excess" we create they just eat up in order to breed more. Our world is dying. The oceans are dying. The catastrophe that is coming will kill just about everything. Unfortunately, those most responsible will have enough money and resources to be among the last to go.
Racist much?The population growth of latino countries is unsustainable. They breed like bacteria. Like a cancerous growth.
How ironic, he contributed to MMGW by lighting himself on fire. What a fool.
Is life on Earth so fragile that a fraction of a degree warmer is going to end it all?
Orbital forcing? What in the hell are you talking about. On second thought, don't tell me.
Which is exactly why they need to show the calculation in two parts because they are separate phenomenon. Each component needs to be evaluated on it's own merit. Combing two separate phenomenon makes it difficult to see the predicted contribution of each, adds unnecessary complexity and confusion to the peer review process, can be seen as intentionally misleading and in short is not transparent. Science thrives on transparency.
I am speaking to you. In that, I am speaking to a dead person. If you are planning on living past about 30 years from now, make other plans. Because you and most of the life on Earth is going to be dead. That inescapable fact is something worth setting yourself on fire to bring attention to.
You mean intentionally, right? So what's the breakdown of the two components then? How much of the 2.9 W/m^2 is from the GHG of CO2 and how much is from the feedback of more water vapor?No one is hiding anything from you. Science isn't lacking transparency so much as people who are not in a given field often assume their own ignorance of the technical details amounts to someone hiding something from them.
While I think the abstract had a bit of a weird comment about the nature of the greenhouse effect, this might help you.
Absorption coefficient of carbon dioxide across atmospheric troposphere layer
Absorption coefficient affected by carbon dioxide concentration and optical path length responsible for temperature or global warming across the troposphere layer, which is less than the altitude of 10 km in the atmosphere, is systematically presented ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
You mean intentionally, right?
Believe what you'd like, but science says that lighting a fire adds more heat to any environment than not lighting said fire.No, I believe his immolation would technically be carbon neutral.
Believe what you'd like, but science says that lighting a fire adds more heat to any environment than not lighting said fire.
And yet it seems you can't tell me what the value is for each component so it must be hidden from you. Unintentionally of course.Correct. And if it is not intentional it is not "hidden".
And yet it seems you can't tell me what the value is for each component so it must be hidden from you. Unintentionally of course.
All good. The best jokes are in bad taste,. For example: Magnus.My comment was a bad taste joke. My apologies for not putting a tag on it.