A clear reason why we need closed Primaries

[progressive hunter]

You said they should be charged as terrorist organizations and banned from political activity.

That's as fascist as fascist can get.

As for your rehashed statement, why should people be denied the ability to tell others on a ballot which party they are part of?

Why is less information better in your opinion?

no I didnt,,

 

[martybegan]

no I didnt,

Yes you did. link below.

A clear reason why we need closed Primaries

 

[progressive hunter]

Yes you did. link below.

A clear reason why we need closed Primaries

that proves you lied,,

 

[martybegan]

that proves you lied,,

Wow, total detachment from reality from you. It's your quote, your fucking words.

What a dickless wonder you are.

 

[progressive hunter]

Wow, total detachment from reality from you. It's your quote, your fucking words.

What a dickless wonder you are.

you said I wanted them charged and I never said that,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Wow, total detachment from reality from you. It's your quote, your fucking words.

What a dickless wonder you are.

are people elected to represent their state or the party they belong to??

since the answer is the state that elected them the party shouldnt be a part of the election or the law making process,,

 

[martybegan]

you said I wanted them charged and I never said that,,

You said you wanted the parties declared terrorist organizations, that can only mean you want to charge the members of the parties as terrorists.

 

[martybegan]

are people elected to represent their state or the party they belong to??

since the answer is the state that elected them the party shouldnt be a part of the election or the law making process,,

They are elected to represent the group of people represented by the voting base for the position in question, IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.

In the primaries, the parties decide who they want to represent their ballot space in the GENERAL ELECTION.

Denying a person the right to declare they are part of "group whatever" on a ballot or in the press is a 1st amendment violation by the government.

 

[progressive hunter]

You said you wanted the parties declared terrorist organizations, that can only mean you want to charge the members of the parties as terrorists.

who the fuck are you to tell me what I meant,,

 

[progressive hunter]

They are elected to represent the group of people represented by the voting base for the position in question, IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.

In the primaries, the parties decide who they want to represent their ballot space in the GENERAL ELECTION.

Denying a person the right to declare they are part of "group whatever" on a ballot or in the press is a 1st amendment violation by the government.

I thought you said rights are not absolute,,

are you now saying they are??

 

[martybegan]

who the fuck are you to tell me what I meant,,

I am telling you how I saw it, and probably how others saw it.

 

[martybegan]

I thought you said rights are not absolute,,

are you now saying they are??

They are not absolute, that doesn't mean they don't exist.

It's called line drawing.

 

[progressive hunter]

I am telling you how I saw it, and probably how others saw it.

so you just mades shit up,, got it,,

according to you rights are not absolute so I'm covered in your book,,

thanks for that,,

 

[progressive hunter]

They are not absolute, that doesn't mean they don't exist.

It's called line drawing.

and who decides where that line is??

 

[martybegan]

so you just mades shit up,, got it,,

according to you rights are not absolute so I'm covered in your book,,

thanks for that,,

No, your intent was cleared in your book.

Just because they aren't absolute, doesn't make your proposed fascism constitutional, aspie.

 

[martybegan]

and who decides where that line is??

Depends on the subject.