A 63 year old movie describes us a little too well

[JoeB131]

Can you prove what you are claiming about Ho Chi Minh?

1955 State of Vietnam referendum - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Thunderbird]

1955 State of Vietnam referendum - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You failed to prove that Ho Chi Minh was capable of winning an “overwealming landslide.”

 

[DonaldFG]

A second Nuremberg trial will be on the way soon. A hearing on this will be getting lots of evidence starting November 11, 2024 in Costa Rica.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Mac, is the DNC increasing your pay along with the increase in desperate hyperbole they are expecting of you?

 

[JoeB131]

You failed to prove that Ho Chi Minh was capable of winning an “overwealming landslide.”

Well, I'm sorry you didn't understand the concept... have someone explain the big words to you.

 

[Thunderbird]

Well, I'm sorry you didn't understand the concept... have someone explain the big words to you.

Let’s see a quote.

 

[JoeB131]

Let’s see a quote.

I provided you the link.

 

[Thunderbird]

I provided you the link.

So you can’t.

 

[JoeB131]

So you can’t.

I provided a link. Have someone help you with the big words.

Because frankly, I make a statement, and you say, "provide a link"

and I provide a link, and you say, "Make a statement".

It gets tiresome.

 

[Thunderbird]

I provided a link. Have someone help you with the big words.

Because frankly, I make a statement, and you say, "provide a link"

and I provide a link, and you say, "Make a statement".

It gets tiresome.

You are tiresome. You made a claim that Ho Chi Minh would have won in a landslide. You then provided a link to an article about a 1955 referendum. Now where in the article is there information proving your statement?

 

[JoeB131]

You are tiresome. You made a claim that Ho Chi Minh would have won in a landslide. You then provided a link to an article about a 1955 referendum. Now where in the article is there information proving your statement?

Again, go ahead and read it, and then have someone explain the big words to you.

 

[Thunderbird]

Again, go ahead and read it, and then have someone explain the big words to you.

We both know you’re full of shit and have no proof.

 

[JoeB131]

We both know you’re full of shit and have no proof.

Go back, read the article, and then have someone explain the big words to you.

 

[Thunderbird]

Again, go ahead and read it, and then have someone explain the big words to you.

We both know you’re full of shit and have no proof.

Go back, read the article, and then have someone explain the big words to you.

I guess actually reading the article and finding a quote is too much for you.

 

[JoeB131]

We both know you’re full of shit and have no proof.
I guess actually reading the article and finding a quote is too much for you.

I provided you the article, that's all I'm obligated to do.

 

[Thunderbird]

I provided you the article, that's all I'm obligated to do.

We both know you are lying. Prove me wrong and show me the quote.

 

[JoeB131]

We both know you are lying. Prove me wrong and show me the quote.

Nope, I provided you the article, that was good enough for me.

This is why I don't provide links... you guys never read them.

 

[Thunderbird]

Nope, I provided you the article, that was good enough for me.

This is why I don't provide links... you guys never read them.

Apparently you don’t read your links either.

 

[imawhosure]

I'm posting this in the Politics section because it so eerily describes our current political climate. I was watching a 1961 movie last night, and a moment in the movie absolutely blew my mind.

At a key moment in the movie (at 2:18:00), a judge (played by Burt Lancaster) who is on trial describes a dark time in the country's history:

There was a fever over the land. A fever of disgrace, of indignity, of hunger. We had a democracy, yes. But it was torn by elements within. Above all, there was fear. Fear of today, fear of tomorrow. Fear of our neighbors, and fear of ourselves. Only when you understand that, can you understand what (he) meant to us. Because he said to us, "lift your heads, be proud to be (who you are). There are devils among us -- communists, liberals, jews, gypsies. Once these devils will be destroyed, your misery will be destroyed". It was the old, old story of the sacrificial lamb.

What about those of us who knew better? We who knew the words were lies, and worse than lies? Why did we sit silent? Why did we take part? Because we loved our country. What difference does it make if a few political extremists lose their rights? What difference does it make if a few racial minorities lose their rights? It is only a passing phase! It is only a stage we're going through! It will be discarded sooner or later! The leader himself will be discarded sooner or later!

The country is in danger. We will march out of the shadows. We will go forward! And history tells us how well we succeeded, your honor.




Pretty amazing. The scene is from Judgment at Nuremberg, 1961.

Judgment at Nuremberg (1961) ⭐ 8.3 | Drama, War

2h 59m | Approved

www.imdb.com

Didn't know you were so touchy/feely. Bet the dudes in women's sports will love you. You can all get together with Tampon Tim and discuss your feelings.