911 WTC 7 Silent Thermate Demolition, Debunkers Grab Your Ankles!

[daws101]

you weren't TILL I EXPLAINED IT TO YOU.
NOW THEN WHAT DOES A FRAME RATE HAVE TO DO WITH ANY OF THIS?

U R kidding ..... right?

BTW: do you know about "Carl & Jerry" .....?

C'mon, Spammy!
Gamolon challenged you to a round of your favorite game ... "pretend physicists" and yet more than 24 hrs later you have failed to respond. In fact, one would get the impression you are avoiding him or are you just too busy playing "Grab Your Ankles" again?

is that with or without the lube?

I just don't get it. Finally someone is willing to play "Pretend Physics" with our village idiot and he packs up his stuff and disappears. What a surprise!

on the collapse thread he dodge you and gave another massively bogus answer to me..

 

[SAYIT]

you weren't TILL I EXPLAINED IT TO YOU.
NOW THEN WHAT DOES A FRAME RATE HAVE TO DO WITH ANY OF THIS?

U R kidding ..... right?

BTW: do you know about "Carl & Jerry" .....?

C'mon, Spammy!
Gamolon challenged you to a round of your favorite game ... "pretend physicists" and yet more than 24 hrs later you have failed to respond. In fact, one would get the impression you are avoiding him or are you just too busy playing "Grab Your Ankles" again?

is that with or without the lube?

I just don't get it. Finally someone is willing to play "Pretend Physics" with our village idiot and he packs up his stuff and disappears. What a surprise!

on the collapse thread he dodge you and gave another massively bogus answer to me..

He strikes me as the emotionally fragile type who struggles to come to grips with the reality that his fantasies are just in his head but fortunately one cannot get seriously injured jumping from one's Mom's basement window.
Whew.

 

[daws101]

U R kidding ..... right?

BTW: do you know about "Carl & Jerry" .....?

C'mon, Spammy!
Gamolon challenged you to a round of your favorite game ... "pretend physicists" and yet more than 24 hrs later you have failed to respond. In fact, one would get the impression you are avoiding him or are you just too busy playing "Grab Your Ankles" again?

is that with or without the lube?

I just don't get it. Finally someone is willing to play "Pretend Physics" with our village idiot and he packs up his stuff and disappears. What a surprise!

on the collapse thread he dodge you and gave another massively bogus answer to me..

He strikes me as the emotionally fragile type who will struggle to come to grips with the reality that his fantasies are just in his head but fortunately one cannot get seriously injured jumping from one's Mom's basement window.
Whew.

and the room's padded

 

[SAYIT]

you weren't TILL I EXPLAINED IT TO YOU.
NOW THEN WHAT DOES A FRAME RATE HAVE TO DO WITH ANY OF THIS?

U R kidding ..... right?

BTW: do you know about "Carl & Jerry" .....?

C'mon, Spammy!
Gamolon challenged you to a round of your favorite game ... "pretend physicists" and yet more than 24 hrs later you have failed to respond. In fact, one would get the impression you are avoiding him or are you just too busy playing "Grab Your Ankles" again?

And here we are another full day later and still no response by Spammy to Gamolon's willingness to engage in a game of Let's-do-the-Math. I bear Spammy no ill will and sincerely hope he will take a cold, hard look at the raging idiot he has become and get some professional help. I further hope he will share his tale of Life-in-the-Rabbit-Hole so others can know how damaging it is.
"I thought the term ‘Truth Movement’ meant that there’d be some search for truth. I was wrong." - Charlie Veitch

 

[SAYIT]

This is getting worrisome (and ridiculous). It now almost a week since Gamolon challenged Spammy's pseudo-physics and one of the CT board's most prolific 9/11 CT posters vanished like a fart in the wind.
C'mon, Spammy ... come back and take your whuppin' like a man.

 

[n0spam4me]

Its really a sort of a moot point, the fact is that whatever was used, be it atomic weapons or firecrackers, the bottom line is that the towers + 7 were an engineered demolition. So whats to argue? Look at the fact of complete & total demolition + the speed of demolition and people dare to allege that the buildings just fell down because of fires ( + alleged airliner crashes to the towers )

 

[SFC Ollie]

Its really a sort of a moot point, the fact is that whatever was used, be it atomic weapons or firecrackers, the bottom line is that the towers + 7 were an engineered demolition. So whats to argue? Look at the fact of complete & total demolition + the speed of demolition and people dare to allege that the buildings just fell down because of fires ( + alleged airliner crashes to the towers )

Anyone ever told you that you were a nut?

 

[Faun]

Seems the Mossad has silently taken out the OP because he knew too much.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Seems the Mossad has silently taken out the OP because he knew too much.

"KokomoJojo......knew too much".

What is something no one said, ever?

 

[KokomoJojo]

So this is the ....third?... 'thermetic cutter' you've claimed was in common use?

1) You can't factually establish that any 'thermetic cutter' even exists. You've show us yet another drawing. Not an actual device.

2) You can't factually establish that if existing, it works as claimed. Patents require no proof of concept, no demonstration that the ideas described are viable or work in any way.

3) You can't factually establish that if existing and working as claimed, any where in the WTC 7. And your theory requires thousands.
.

awe skylar did I ignore you?

So sorry, sure here is a cutter just for you, just to show you what backwards neanderthal you are.



the technology is really easy and simple. you could make on in your back yard and it slices through steel far better than a hot knife through butter and requires very little thermate too.

Oh yeh, well the proof is all that molten shit, unless you want to go for a nook, otherwise the only other options you have available that could produce that kind of heat are the looney tune posers and official story huggers hot air.

enjoy, been a pleasure teaching you how wrong you are.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So this is the ....third?... 'thermetic cutter' you've claimed was in common use?

1) You can't factually establish that any 'thermetic cutter' even exists. You've show us yet another drawing. Not an actual device.

2) You can't factually establish that if existing, it works as claimed. Patents require no proof of concept, no demonstration that the ideas described are viable or work in any way.

3) You can't factually establish that if existing and working as claimed, any where in the WTC 7. And your theory requires thousands.
.

awe skylar did I ignore you?

So sorry, sure here is a cutter just for you, just to show you what backwards neanderthal you are.



the technology is really easy and simple. you could make on in your back yard and it slices through steel far better than a hot knife through butter and requires very little thermate too.

Oh yeh, well the proof is all that molten shit, unless you want to go for a nook, otherwise the only other options you have available that could produce that kind of heat are the looney tune posers and official story huggers hot air.

enjoy, been a pleasure teaching you how wrong you are.

So how many of those were found in the wreckage?

 

[daws101]

So this is the ....third?... 'thermetic cutter' you've claimed was in common use?

1) You can't factually establish that any 'thermetic cutter' even exists. You've show us yet another drawing. Not an actual device.

2) You can't factually establish that if existing, it works as claimed. Patents require no proof of concept, no demonstration that the ideas described are viable or work in any way.

3) You can't factually establish that if existing and working as claimed, any where in the WTC 7. And your theory requires thousands.
.

awe skylar did I ignore you?

So sorry, sure here is a cutter just for you, just to show you what backwards neanderthal you are.



the technology is really easy and simple. you could make on in your back yard and it slices through steel far better than a hot knife through butter and requires very little thermate too.

Oh yeh, well the proof is all that molten shit, unless you want to go for a nook, otherwise the only other options you have available that could produce that kind of heat are the looney tune posers and official story huggers hot air.

enjoy, been a pleasure teaching you how wrong you are.

problem is it would never work on any thing larger than rebar.
also no evidence was found.
sane people 10 koko 0

 

[Skylar]

So this is the ....third?... 'thermetic cutter' you've claimed was in common use?

1) You can't factually establish that any 'thermetic cutter' even exists. You've show us yet another drawing. Not an actual device.

2) You can't factually establish that if existing, it works as claimed. Patents require no proof of concept, no demonstration that the ideas described are viable or work in any way.

3) You can't factually establish that if existing and working as claimed, any where in the WTC 7. And your theory requires thousands.
.

awe skylar did I ignore you?

So sorry, sure here is a cutter just for you, just to show you what backwards neanderthal you are.



the technology is really easy and simple. you could make on in your back yard and it slices through steel far better than a hot knife through butter and requires very little thermate too.

Oh yeh, well the proof is all that molten shit, unless you want to go for a nook, otherwise the only other options you have available that could produce that kind of heat are the looney tune posers and official story huggers hot air.

enjoy, been a pleasure teaching you how wrong you are.

So how many of those were found in the wreckage?

Exactly. Remember, if you size up the devices to match the size of the girders it would be cutting, it would be approximately 10 feet long and about 3 and half feet in diameter, weighing as much as a small car. And there's need to be one for each girder at each floor. So there would be thousands of them.

So, um....where are they? They'd be everywhere, scattered throughout the rubble, especially toward the top of the pile, as you insist they were used at the top of the building. Yet no one ever found one. Not before, not during, not after the fire and collapse.

Second, how were they syncronized? Remember, they were on fire BEFORE they would have gone off. So all those cables wouldn't have been consumed by the fire. Any timers would have been reduced to bubbling pools of plastic. So how, pray tell, do you get perfect syncronization.

And if they were installed BEFORE the impacts, do you think someone might have noticed these car sized canisters strapped sideways to every girder? These buildings weren't museums. They were used, maintained, inspected. Yet no one ever saw any of the imagined 'thermite canisters' despite your theory mandating thousands.

And if they were installed AFTER the impacts, how did the FDNY miss them? How were they installed while the building was ON FIRE? Invisible, fire proof, ninja janitors was it?

Truthers can't resolve any of these theory killing holes. Any one of which renders the theory virtually impossible. Together, they demonstrate its silliness.

 

[Skylar]

So this is the ....third?... 'thermetic cutter' you've claimed was in common use?

1) You can't factually establish that any 'thermetic cutter' even exists. You've show us yet another drawing. Not an actual device.

2) You can't factually establish that if existing, it works as claimed. Patents require no proof of concept, no demonstration that the ideas described are viable or work in any way.

3) You can't factually establish that if existing and working as claimed, any where in the WTC 7. And your theory requires thousands.
.

awe skylar did I ignore you?

So sorry, sure here is a cutter just for you, just to show you what backwards neanderthal you are.



the technology is really easy and simple. you could make on in your back yard and it slices through steel far better than a hot knife through butter and requires very little thermate too.

Oh yeh, well the proof is all that molten shit, unless you want to go for a nook, otherwise the only other options you have available that could produce that kind of heat are the looney tune posers and official story huggers hot air.

enjoy, been a pleasure teaching you how wrong you are.

problem is it would never work on any thing larger than rebar.
also no evidence was found.
sane people 10 koko 0

Koko's thermite cutters change like magic depending what hole in his theory he's desperately trying plug. When you ask him where the thousands and thousands of thermite cutters are, he quotes one source that shows a device that is consumed in use. But couldn't cut a girder.

When you ask him how the girders could have been cut by such a device, he shows you something that may well be able to cut a girder......if it were 10 feet long, 3 and half feet in diameter and weighing as much as a small car. And were placed on the building by the thousands....and would have absolutely survived a buidling fire.

When you ask him where the thousands and thousands of car sized canisters were.....he cites the 'cutter' that doesn't actually cut anything that would have been consumed by use.

Brainwash, rinse, repeat.

 

[KokomoJojo]

So how many of those were found in the wreckage?

none if they worked properly, since they self consume and become molten iron upon exhaustion.

doesnt matter though because they ruled out anything related to demolition and didnt bother to look.

 

[KokomoJojo]

So this is the ....third?... 'thermetic cutter' you've claimed was in common use?

1) You can't factually establish that any 'thermetic cutter' even exists. You've show us yet another drawing. Not an actual device.

2) You can't factually establish that if existing, it works as claimed. Patents require no proof of concept, no demonstration that the ideas described are viable or work in any way.

3) You can't factually establish that if existing and working as claimed, any where in the WTC 7. And your theory requires thousands.
.

awe skylar did I ignore you?

So sorry, sure here is a cutter just for you, just to show you what backwards neanderthal you are.



the technology is really easy and simple. you could make on in your back yard and it slices through steel far better than a hot knife through butter and requires very little thermate too.

Oh yeh, well the proof is all that molten shit, unless you want to go for a nook, otherwise the only other options you have available that could produce that kind of heat are the looney tune posers and official story huggers hot air.

enjoy, been a pleasure teaching you how wrong you are.

So how many of those were found in the wreckage?

Exactly. Remember, if you size up the devices to match the size of the girders it would be cutting, it would be approximately 10 feet long and about 3 and half feet in diameter, weighing as much as a small car. And there's need to be one for each girder at each floor. So there would be thousands of them.

So, um....where are they? They'd be everywhere, scattered throughout the rubble, especially toward the top of the pile, as you insist they were used at the top of the building. Yet no one ever found one. Not before, not during, not after the fire and collapse.

Second, how were they syncronized? Remember, they were on fire BEFORE they would have gone off. So all those cables wouldn't have been consumed by the fire. Any timers would have been reduced to bubbling pools of plastic. So how, pray tell, do you get perfect syncronization.

And if they were installed BEFORE the impacts, do you think someone might have noticed these car sized canisters strapped sideways to every girder? These buildings weren't museums. They were used, maintained, inspected. Yet no one ever saw any of the imagined 'thermite canisters' despite your theory mandating thousands.

And if they were installed AFTER the impacts, how did the FDNY miss them? How were they installed while the building was ON FIRE? Invisible, fire proof, ninja janitors was it?

Truthers can't resolve any of these theory killing holes. Any one of which renders the theory virtually impossible. Together, they demonstrate its silliness.

Nah its fun watching ignoramusus maximus huggerus wallow in foolishness.

Actually the amount of high grade thermate needed is very little since its only the catalyst and the devices are WAY smaller than what the predictions some web idiots made. Especially if you dope em with generically speaking exotic metals.

I suppose you are one of the neandrathals who think the only way is det cord?

Just watch the pretty twinkles and you can follow the sychronization

Oh and this one is NOT the wtc


This one is

Now had you taken the time to actually understand the material you are ridiculing you wouldnt look so foolish aboyt now.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So how many of those were found in the wreckage?

none if they worked properly, since they self consume and become molten iron upon exhaustion.

doesnt matter though because they ruled out anything related to demolition and didnt bother to look.

none if they worked properly, since they self consume

The device in your video doesn't self consume.
Try again?

 

[KokomoJojo]

none if they worked properly, since they self consume

The device in your video doesn't self consume.
Try again?

no shit! LOL



do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents? LOL

Just imagine how kick ass the real mcCoy is now that we have seen a kid who built one that works that good out of shit from his back yard scrap heap eh!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

none if they worked properly, since they self consume

The device in your video doesn't self consume.
Try again?

no shit! LOL



do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents? LOL

Just imagine how kick ass the real mcCoy is now that we have seen a kid who built one that works that good out of shit from his back yard scrap heap eh!

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

 

[Skylar]

So this is the ....third?... 'thermetic cutter' you've claimed was in common use?

1) You can't factually establish that any 'thermetic cutter' even exists. You've show us yet another drawing. Not an actual device.

2) You can't factually establish that if existing, it works as claimed. Patents require no proof of concept, no demonstration that the ideas described are viable or work in any way.

3) You can't factually establish that if existing and working as claimed, any where in the WTC 7. And your theory requires thousands.
.

awe skylar did I ignore you?

So sorry, sure here is a cutter just for you, just to show you what backwards neanderthal you are.



the technology is really easy and simple. you could make on in your back yard and it slices through steel far better than a hot knife through butter and requires very little thermate too.

Oh yeh, well the proof is all that molten shit, unless you want to go for a nook, otherwise the only other options you have available that could produce that kind of heat are the looney tune posers and official story huggers hot air.

enjoy, been a pleasure teaching you how wrong you are.

So how many of those were found in the wreckage?

Exactly. Remember, if you size up the devices to match the size of the girders it would be cutting, it would be approximately 10 feet long and about 3 and half feet in diameter, weighing as much as a small car. And there's need to be one for each girder at each floor. So there would be thousands of them.

So, um....where are they? They'd be everywhere, scattered throughout the rubble, especially toward the top of the pile, as you insist they were used at the top of the building. Yet no one ever found one. Not before, not during, not after the fire and collapse.

Second, how were they syncronized? Remember, they were on fire BEFORE they would have gone off. So all those cables wouldn't have been consumed by the fire. Any timers would have been reduced to bubbling pools of plastic. So how, pray tell, do you get perfect syncronization.

And if they were installed BEFORE the impacts, do you think someone might have noticed these car sized canisters strapped sideways to every girder? These buildings weren't museums. They were used, maintained, inspected. Yet no one ever saw any of the imagined 'thermite canisters' despite your theory mandating thousands.

And if they were installed AFTER the impacts, how did the FDNY miss them? How were they installed while the building was ON FIRE? Invisible, fire proof, ninja janitors was it?

Truthers can't resolve any of these theory killing holes. Any one of which renders the theory virtually impossible. Together, they demonstrate its silliness.

Nah its fun watching ignoramusus maximus huggerus wallow in foolishness.

Laughing.....and yet you still can't tell me where all the enormous canisters strapped to each of the girders on each floor holding the nanothermite went after the buildling collapsed. Because none were ever found. Despite your theory requiring thousands.

Nor can you explain why no girder was cut in a manner consistent with thermite. We had bending. We have warping. We had twisting. But no cuts.

And of course, no thermite reactions were ever observed. And they use nanothermite in fireworks. So we're not exactly talking about subtle here. Your theory mandates they occured by the thousand. And there were none. And you have no explaination.

You also can't explain for how this fantastically complex system of demolition worked while ON FIRE. As the WTC 7 was engulfed in flames.

Nor can you explain how canisters the size of a small car strapped to the side of a girder would go unnoticed by say, the folks that work in the building. Or the janitors. Or the building inspectors. Or the Port Authority Bomb Squad. Or the FDNY.

So......giant canisters of thermite that can't be seen, disappear completely after use, that produce thermite reactions that can't be seen either, bringing down a building by NOT cutting any girder. While the building is on fire.

Does that about cover it?

Actually the amount of high grade thermate needed is very little since its only the catalyst and the devices are WAY smaller than what the predictions some web idiots made. Especially if you dope em with generically speaking exotic metals.

Surely you realize that you're talking completely out of your ass, as you don't have the slightest clue how much 'nanothermite' it would take to do anything. Let alone bring down a building. As you don't know what yuo

Hell, you can even decide what conspiracy you're going to follow. As your description of the devices changes with virtually every recitation.

I suppose you are one of the neandrathals who think the only way is det cord?

Just watch the pretty twinkles and you can follow the sychronization

Oh and this one is NOT the wtc


This one is

Why are your gifs so uselessly small? Why are they so wildly modified? Why are they in black and white? Remember, in the unmodified images, nothing you're describing is visible. You can't tell us how they were modified, or by whom.

So how do we know that they're even remotely accurate? And why aren't you asking these questions?