There's about ten million less in the workforce now than when Obama took office.
Some of that is due to retirement, but not all.
If at least some of these millions were counted the unemplyment rate would be higher.
I think the only number that really tells us anything is the number of jobs created month by month.
When that number is over 125,000 we are creating more jobs than population growth. Less than that, we are falling behind.
So that is the only trend that really matters to me as far as employment numbers goes.
After that, what matters most is the wages people are receiving for the new jobs. Are they part time, low wage jobs, or are higher paying jobs rising?
If you look, you will find that job growth has been sluggish since before Obama. It has been sluggish since 2000. Under Bush, only 3 million jobs were created in 8 years, where 25 million were created during Clinton's two terms.
I believe a big reason for that is that in 2000 total public and private debt crossed 260% of GDP. Studies have shown that when that happens, excessive debt blocks the main channel of monetary influence on economic activity.