Dear
Disir:
And how many civilians were killed in the recent church shooting in Texas?
What about the 9 soldiers killed at the Fort Hood military base
by a terrorist sympathizer deemed "workplace violence":
Texas floods: 9 soldiers killed at Fort Hood - CNN
Doesn't that mean Texas or the US Military in general are ineffective?
In cases of mentally or criminally ill people violently targeting and attacking others,
the one hope I have found for diagnosing and screening such illness in advance
is Christian spiritual healing.
Governments cannot impose or regulate spiritual healing that is necessary to catch and
cure criminal illness before it becomes deadly.
It is the people who need to choose to study and implement such means
and methods "voluntarily" .
So what you are essentially saying is people or society
are ineffective in our current approaches to crime and violence, including terrorists attacks.
We only respond "after the fact" which is what our govts are limited to.
It is our churches and spiritual knowledge and methods of diagnosing, treating and curing disorders that can detect abuses and dangers in advance;
but those are not in charge of public security which is the job of govt.
If these two authorities do not work together,
yes, it becomes conflicting and ineffective.
Thanks
Disir
And yes you can say that if people in Pakistan whose
govt and religion either reject or remain divided from
Christian knowledge and practice of spiritual healing,
that is the same problem or worse than division in
America and elsewhere, where church and state are
working in opposition against each other and the people's best interest.
You could say Pakistan is even "more" ineffective,
because of political religious strife, but all nations
including American face this same conflict causing similar problems.