OK, let the record show you would rather sit there and fling insults than discuss the topic YOU made a thread of. What a fucking pussy! I knew you wouldn't actually tell us what you really think.

That's what happens when one lets videos do their thinking for them.
OK, Dick Cheney was involved in 9/11. The last video I posted presented evidence of that.
I am willing to discuss that point.
OK. Once again you FORCE people to watch your fucking retarded videos because you are incapable of actually thinking for yourself and presenting your case. So noted.
So let's break it down.
We're listening to a retard named Michael Ruppert who is shamelessly hawking his books to the gullible sheep. Two minutes in and all he's doing is selling his book. This is your source?
BTW, his book was a huge failure. I've read the book. It is retarded to a degree only a first grader would find it credible and then only if the first grader was trying to make a bad joke.
To sum up, Crossing the rubicon aledges that Cheney was personally responsible for 9/11 and, with the help of Israel and Saudi Arabia (no I'm not kidding), used remote controls to bring in the planes into the towers, a missile into the Pentagon while flight 77 was landed elsewhere, and Flight 93 was landed elsewhere and the Shanksville site was made up.

In other words, every major conspiratard theory out there.
I would like to note that at the 3:05 mark, Ruppert actually admits he is ignoring all physical evidence. Isn't this what I always say truthtards do? Ignore all evidence that they don't like?
His reasons? First he claims the photographic evidence is inadmissible in a court of law because of no chain of posession.

What.... he thinks all the investigators are completely incompetent and don't know how to gather evidence that would be admissible in court? Considering all the photographs that WERE admitted as evidence in a court of law and went through the proper examinations, one can correctly deduce that Ruppert is using this as an excuse. He knows the physical evidence makes a mockery of his OPINIONS that Cheney was behind 9/11.
His second reason for ignoring all the evidence? Because it is subject to interpretation.

What a fucking whiner! Again, his claims are PROVEN false as the same evidence he ignores WAS introduced and vetted in a court of law.
Still hawking and bragging about his book at the 4 minute mark, he pretends his work of fiction is admissible in court as evidence as it isn't open for interpretation.

What a fucking RETARD!!!! His OPINION is not evidence. It is OPINION. He has no hard evidence to back up his claims and when he freely admits he is IGNORING evidence in order to make his fantasy seem real, one has to seriously wonder who would be so fucking stupid as to believe this guy.
OK. Five minutes in and he FINALLY gets to the motive. Peak oil. Except peak oil is a myth. Not only that, but the myth that 9/11 was about oil is proven now that we have a decade of history behind us. What did the oil companies get out of 9/11? Iraq? Nope. Very little of the oil production went to US companies and the Iraqi government is firmly in control of the Iraq oil fields. The Afghan pipeline? Still being discussed, but no hard plans. So peak oil as a reason has been proven bullshit.
So let's discuss. Starting at the 5 minute mark, Ruppert makes the following claim
The attacks of September 11th were a pretext for the American, and to a lesser extent, British and Israeli "empires" to begin seizing by force those energy supplies needed to sustain their power, hegemony whether regional or global, and their teetering economies. Both governments were involved well before the attacks occured. The attacks of 9/11 were accomplished through an amazing orchestration of logistics and personnel.
Ten years later. What oil fields has ANYONE taken over? Come on. This is his whole argument for why 9/11 took place, yet HIS PREDICTIONS DIDN'T HAPPEN. Not even a little bit. Seriously. When someone is THIS FAR off base, don't you have to question the story as a whole?
He then goes on to refute Clark's claim that there would be too many people involved. Ruppert points to the Manhattan project as proof it can be kept secret, except this too is an extremely retarded position. The Manhattan project was a secret because they kept people sequestered so they couldn't talk, and after the atom bomb was released, the secret was out. There was no way they could have kept the Manhattan project a secret indefinitely as Ruppert would have you believe.
At 6:30, Ruppert, in his ignorance, pretends the war games being conducted at the time of 9/11 are the smoking gun evidence of government involvement of 9/11. Never mind that the war games are conducted every year. Never mind that the war games made no impact on the events of 9/11. Never mind that it took approximately five seconds for someone to ask if this was real world or an excercise to understand it WASN'T part of the war games. Never mind that the war games did not take away one iota of what America had in terms of defense. Never mind the truth. Ruppert thinks the war games are the evidence. He was found wrong by every account. ATC, FAA, NTSB, NORAD, NEADS, and Air National Guard accountings show beyond any doubt that the war games had ZERO IMPACT to the events of 9/11.
Even better, shit for brains Ruppert claims at 6:45 that Cheney was in charge of the war games!!!!

What a hoot! You do realize that Cheney was put in charge of overseeing the creation of a group to oversee the wargames, right? I mean, this is really old news. Cheney had as much to do with the war games as you or I do. The office he was put in charge of creating WASN'T EVEN IN PLACE on 9/11! Yet this fucker is lying his ass off to you trying to pretend Cheney was in charge. If Cheney was in charge, why is it not ONE COMMAND from Cheney to the people running the war games was ever found?
At 7 minutes he makes a blatant lie. He claims that ALL the wargames but two were all centered around hijackings from within the United States and in the NEADS area. This is simply not true. ONE of the wargames had PART of it dealing with hijackings from overseas. And again, it took all of five seconds for NEADS to ask and get confirmation that what the FAA was dealing with was NOT part of the excercise.
Do you HONESTLY believe the military wouldn't have a contingency plan if a REAL attack happened at the same time excercises were going on? Because as idiotic as not having a way of telling reality from exercise is, that is EXACTLY what Ruppert is demanding you do in order for his fantasy to hold water.
Ruppert then goes on to pretend that the exercises directly involved the planes that were on standby for a real attack. This is proven untrue as those planes were both ready to be launched and WERE launched when NEADS ordered it.
THEN Ruppert goes on to pretend that Northern Vigilance pulled all the aircraft to the north, preventing any kind of response. Again, the events of 9/11 showed that aircraft were present, but not prepared, nor were they SUPPOSE to be prepared.
The FACT of the matter is there were only four aircraft on ready status for the North Eastern United States. This was by design and had not changed in decades. No amount of pretending by Ruppert changes this fact. I suppose this is just another piece of hard evidence he conveniently ignored in order to sell his books to mindless sheep.
THEN Ruppert pretends that the military was flying around remote controlled aircraft to simulate the hijacked aircraft for the military.

Except NOTHING backs up his bullshit claim. NOTHING in six years shows the military was using or even had the capability then to use remote controlled aircraft to simulate hijacked aircraft. And why would they? Hijacked aircraft were to be escorted to a safe place to land, not be shot down. Why would anyone risk an unproven technology for no gain?
At 9:45, Ruppert again makes the claims the war games effectively paralized our response. HOW? NEADS asked and was informed that this was real world and launched fighters as it was suppose to upon request from the FAA. For someone who claims to have investigated this, this is an oversight that cannot and should not be excused by ANYONE.
At 13:30, Ruppert claims the radar injects were continued after the attack was known and that the FAA was having to deal with 22 hijackings at once. Yet this claim is not backed up by ANYONE other than him.

At 18:15 Ruppert starts going off on pretending that the Whitehouse should have been in contact by Giulliani. He then bases his whole argument on a lie. He pretends the only fighters launched towards NYC were from Otis. This is a lie you can easily verify for yourself. The fighters launched from Langley BEFORE the Pentagon was struck were heading for NYC due to the FAA believing Flight 11 was still in the air and heading south from the NYC area. How is it this gasbag doesn't know this? Oh right. Because otherwise he has nothing. The rest of the video is him pretending the Whitehouse HAD to be talking about Otis and thus nothing adds up. Well, yeah. If you start with a lie, it is VERY hard to get things to add up. When you work with the truth, it is very EASY to get things to add up.
OK, Tinmore. I watched your video. As predicted, it didn't bring to light one new or even remotely new item that hasn't been gone over a thousand times before. All it did was reconfirm to me that Ruppert is out to milk you stupid sheep for all you are worth by lying his ass off to anyone who will buy his books.