80% of the Letitia James case for "Fraud" was tossed....statute of limitations

Is this an indication that the democrat's "lawfare" against Trump will fail?

  • Yes

    Votes: 20 69.0%
  • No

    Votes: 9 31.0%

  • Total voters
    29
Who is illiterate?

The judge who agreed with the prosecutor that “Trump and his company deceived banks, insurers and others by massively overvaluing his assets and exaggerating his net worth on paperwork” or his ever-gullible retard followers?

Point here is, the guilt of the orange loser has been established. All we are now waiting for is the amount of fines Trump has to pay.

Your orange fuhrer is trying to spin this and of course you idiots are falling for it. As usual. :itsok:

Fake news! Did the banks sue?
 
It was beyond obvious that this persecution was purely political when the only parties in court are political opponents. The corrupt or incompetent banks got a pass, the professional assessors all got passes, yet it was their job to know and correct any discrepancy. So they were incompetent or complicit. If anyone is a risk to the public it is them. How many customers are effected if banks don't bother to perform due diligence? Looks like today's liberals are occupied by Wall St. How pathetic.
 
It was beyond obvious that this persecution was purely political when the only parties in court are political opponents. The corrupt or incompetent banks got a pass, the professional assessors all got passes, yet it was their job to know and correct any discrepancy. So they were incompetent or complicit. If anyone is a risk to the public it is them. How many customers are effected if banks don't bother to perform due diligence? Looks like today's liberals are occupied by Wall St. How pathetic.

The Democrats are simply lying.
There is none of what you mentioned.
 
Trump just left the court house praising the judge for being fair, since he just tossed 80% of Latitia James' case.
The democrat's "prosecutorial misconduct" exposed.


This OP appears to be FAKE news. I haven't seen any credible sources to verify it. This story may be related to some very old news about the statute of limitation in this case - which had previously been considered and adjudicated. Doesn't sound like anything new.
 
Who is illiterate?

The judge who agreed with the prosecutor that “Trump and his company deceived banks, insurers and others by massively overvaluing his assets and exaggerating his net worth on paperwork” or his ever-gullible retard followers?

Point here is, the guilt of the orange loser has been established. All we are now waiting for is the amount of fines Trump has to pay.

Your orange fuhrer is trying to spin this and of course you idiots are falling for it. As usual. :itsok:
So you just totally make shit up if you don't like something?
Is that the rule?
 

Forum List

Back
Top