80% of the Letitia James case for "Fraud" was tossed....statute of limitations

Is this an indication that the democrat's "lawfare" against Trump will fail?

  • Yes

    Votes: 20 69.0%
  • No

    Votes: 9 31.0%

  • Total voters
    29
The people suing Trump are ā€œThe Peopleā€. What you’re calling the ā€œfundingā€ of those suing Trump is actually the public taking back what was stolen and issuing fines as punishment. It’s what we all face, but the MAGA crowd wants a two-tier system in Trump’s favor!
How did the public lose money?
 
The people suing Trump are ā€œThe Peopleā€. What you’re calling the ā€œfundingā€ of those suing Trump is actually the public taking back what was stolen and issuing fines as punishment. It’s what we all face, but the MAGA crowd wants a two-tier system in Trump’s favor!
/——/ What was taken? You’re grasping at straws.
 
Every time inflated and deflated values to suit a particular deal, he was stealing from everyone that played by the rules.
1. Neither the taxing authorities, nor banks allow a property owner or borrower to appraise real estate for tax and loan purposes.

2. You failed to show how anything Trump did cost the public anything.
 
No criminal prosecution, hence no crime.

Who lost something in these transactions?
Yeah, keep parroting/whining at the same points. That will definitely make a difference in court! :laughing0301:
 
You are the only one who has that fantasy
So, no to the JFK Jr. fantasy, eh? But you still believe your orange loser is going to go scot-free from all his cases, right?
 
Every time inflated and deflated values to suit a particular deal, he was stealing from everyone that played by the rules.
/——-/ What a load of Hillary. You’re just making up crap because you hate Trump. You need to PROVE damages, not some obscure hypothesis. You blithering idiot.
 
/——-/ What a load of Hillary. You’re just making up crap because you hate Trump. You need to PROVE damages, not some obscure hypothesis. You blithering idiot.
I don’t have to prove anything. We have prosecutors for that and they seem to be doing a good job, thank you.
 
1. Neither the taxing authorities, nor banks allow a property owner or borrower to appraise real estate for tax and loan purposes.

2. You failed to show how anything Trump did cost the public anything.
See message #271.
 
So, no to the JFK Jr. fantasy, eh? But you still believe your orange loser is going to go scot-free from all his cases, right?

None of them will survive an appellate court.
 
I don’t have to prove anything. We have prosecutors for that and they seem to be doing a good job, thank you.
/——/ That was a generic YOU, not the personal you, dumbass. You won’t prove damages because you can’t. If Trump defrauded the banks, it would be public knowledge.
 
/——/ That was a generic YOU, not the personal you, dumbass. You won’t prove damages because you can’t. If Trump defrauded the banks, it would be public knowledge.
It’s becoming common knowledge, because of the trial. Is he supposed to get some kind of credit for keeping his crimes well hidden?!?! :rolleyes-41:
 
Well, let's see what day 2 brings. :dunno:
 
It’s becoming common knowledge, because of the trial. Is he supposed to get some kind of credit for keeping his crimes well hidden?!?! :rolleyes-41:
So where's this common knowledge? Link-?
 
Yeah, keep parroting/whining at the same points. That will definitely make a difference in court! :laughing0301:

With a fair court it would. With Dr Crane giving the choice between death or exile, probably not.
 
Back
Top Bottom