8 things to stop mass shooters, that won't stop mass shooters, and are pretty dumb ideas....

[2aguy]

The anti gunners think they are pretty clever....here is another one. He lists 8 things to stop future mass public shooters....and none of them would stop a mass shooter........but don't let that stop him...

Democrats Have No Idea How To Prevent Mass Shootings

 

[Pogo]

The anti gunners think they are pretty clever....here is another one. He lists 8 things to stop future mass public shooters....and none of them would stop a mass shooter........but don't let that stop him...

Democrats Have No Idea How To Prevent Mass Shootings

Where are you getting "Democrat"?

Where in fact do you see any citation of a political party at all?

 

[2aguy]

The anti gunners think they are pretty clever....here is another one. He lists 8 things to stop future mass public shooters....and none of them would stop a mass shooter........but don't let that stop him...

Democrats Have No Idea How To Prevent Mass Shootings

Where are you getting "Democrat"?

Where in fact do you see any citation of a political party at all?

Kristoff is a democrat....dumb shit....and these are democrat, anti gun talking points......

 

[Pogo]

The anti gunners think they are pretty clever....here is another one. He lists 8 things to stop future mass public shooters....and none of them would stop a mass shooter........but don't let that stop him...

Democrats Have No Idea How To Prevent Mass Shootings

Where are you getting "Democrat"?

Where in fact do you see any citation of a political party at all?

Kristoff is a democrat....dumb shit....and these are democrat, anti gun talking points......

Instead of restating the premise try answering the question.

WHERE are you getting "Democrat"?

Do I need to explain what the word "where" means? Or do you think you can handle it?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

So now Pogo is going to attempt to claim that the left side of the aisle is NOT the side where you will find individuals who are most likely the ones to either call for gun bans, or more gun restrictions.

 

[Pogo]

So now Pogo is going to attempt to claim that the left side of the aisle is NOT the side where you will find individuals who are most likely the ones to either call for gun bans, or more gun restrictions.

So now Pogo is going to sit and wait for an answer that he already knows will never come, since the OP pulled it out of his ass.

The writer is not a politician. There's no evidence for what his political affiliation is or if he even has one. But the OP will never admit that. He'll just run away.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Obviously we should ban hotels being within firing range of concert venues.

lolol

But that is after we have passed a law that removes the trigger fingers of all white males.

roflmao

 

[TNHarley]

So now Pogo is going to attempt to claim that the left side of the aisle is NOT the side where you will find individuals who are most likely the ones to either call for gun bans, or more gun restrictions.

So now Pogo is going to sit and wait for an answer that he already knows will never come, since the OP pulled it out of his ass.

The writer is not a politician. There's no evidence for what his political affiliation is or if he even has one. But the OP will never admit that. He'll just run away.

Nick kristof? LOL

 

[westwall]

The anti gunners think they are pretty clever....here is another one. He lists 8 things to stop future mass public shooters....and none of them would stop a mass shooter........but don't let that stop him...

Democrats Have No Idea How To Prevent Mass Shootings

Where are you getting "Democrat"?

Where in fact do you see any citation of a political party at all?

Kristoff is a democrat....dumb shit....and these are democrat, anti gun talking points......

Instead of restating the premise try answering the question.

WHERE are you getting "Democrat"?

Do I need to explain what the word "where" means? Or do you think you can handle it?

He answered you dumbshit. The fact that you don't like the answer doesn't negate the fact that he answered you. Now, stop acting stupid. Or is that not possible with you?

 

[JimBowie1958]

He answered you dumbshit. The fact that you don't like the answer doesn't negate the fact that he answered you. Now, stop acting stupid. Or is that not possible with you?

I am shocked that you would speak so unkindly to a mentally disabled person, Westwall.

SHOCKED, JUST SHOCKED!


hit him again; go for the fences!

 

[Pogo]

The anti gunners think they are pretty clever....here is another one. He lists 8 things to stop future mass public shooters....and none of them would stop a mass shooter........but don't let that stop him...

Democrats Have No Idea How To Prevent Mass Shootings

Where are you getting "Democrat"?

Where in fact do you see any citation of a political party at all?

Kristoff is a democrat....dumb shit....and these are democrat, anti gun talking points......

Instead of restating the premise try answering the question.

WHERE are you getting "Democrat"?

Do I need to explain what the word "where" means? Or do you think you can handle it?

He answered you dumbshit. The fact that you don't like the answer doesn't negate the fact that he answered you. Now, stop acting stupid. Or is that not possible with you?

This is the same bullshit where you claim to have "answered" a similar question the other day.

Apparently on planet Self-Delusion all you do is claim, "uh, yeah I already did that". If such answer actually existed, it could be quoted. And no, ipse dixit ("Kristoff is a democrat [sic]....dumb shit....") in no way qualifies as a response.

And no, the fact that the question cannot be answered doesn't make you have done it in the past. I posed both questions specifically because I already know they have no answer. This is what's called in discourse a rhetorical question. Thus the askee is left with either the honest choice of admitting he has no evidence for his claim and therefore engaged in fabrication; or the wimp choice of running away. The OP here, and you in the other thread, chose the latter.

 

[Brain357]

The anti gunners think they are pretty clever....here is another one. He lists 8 things to stop future mass public shooters....and none of them would stop a mass shooter........but don't let that stop him...

Democrats Have No Idea How To Prevent Mass Shootings

Strong gun control has reduced mass shootings. We are only civilized country with this problem. Everywhere else it is rare or requires a terrorist group.

 

[westwall]

The anti gunners think they are pretty clever....here is another one. He lists 8 things to stop future mass public shooters....and none of them would stop a mass shooter........but don't let that stop him...

Democrats Have No Idea How To Prevent Mass Shootings

Where are you getting "Democrat"?

Where in fact do you see any citation of a political party at all?

Kristoff is a democrat....dumb shit....and these are democrat, anti gun talking points......

Instead of restating the premise try answering the question.

WHERE are you getting "Democrat"?

Do I need to explain what the word "where" means? Or do you think you can handle it?

He answered you dumbshit. The fact that you don't like the answer doesn't negate the fact that he answered you. Now, stop acting stupid. Or is that not possible with you?

This is the same bullshit where you claim to have "answered" a similar question the other day.

Apparently on planet Self-Delusion all you do is claim, "uh, yeah I already did that". If such answer actually existed, it could be quoted. And no, ipse dixit ("Kristoff is a democrat [sic]....dumb shit....") in no way qualifies as a response.

And no, the fact that the question cannot be answered doesn't make you have done it in the past. I posed both questions specifically because I already know they have no answer. This is what's called in discourse a rhetorical question. Thus the askee is left with either the honest choice of admitting he has no evidence for his claim and therefore engaged in fabrication; or the wimp choice of running away. The OP here, and you in the other thread, chose the latter.

Wrong silly boy. Your pissant questions are being answered. You're either too stupid to understand the response, or are simply acting the petulant child screaming in the aisle because your mommy won't buy you a candy. You get to choose which sort of imbecile you are.

 

[westwall]

The anti gunners think they are pretty clever....here is another one. He lists 8 things to stop future mass public shooters....and none of them would stop a mass shooter........but don't let that stop him...

Democrats Have No Idea How To Prevent Mass Shootings

Strong gun control has reduced mass shootings. We are only civilized country with this problem. Everywhere else it is rare or requires a terrorist group.

Tell that to the victims of the Norwegian and Paris shootings. Both had more fatalities. You are factually wrong on all counts and both of those countries have gun laws that you would swoon over.

 

[Brain357]

The anti gunners think they are pretty clever....here is another one. He lists 8 things to stop future mass public shooters....and none of them would stop a mass shooter........but don't let that stop him...

Democrats Have No Idea How To Prevent Mass Shootings

Strong gun control has reduced mass shootings. We are only civilized country with this problem. Everywhere else it is rare or requires a terrorist group.

Tell that to the victims of the Norwegian and Paris shootings. Both had more fatalities. You are factually wrong on all counts and both of those countries have gun laws that you would swoon over.

Norway was a one time event. Nothing before or since. We have these regularly. Paris required a terrorist group and had many shooters. Both countries have much lower homicide rates than us. And they don't have police shot and killed weekly.

 

[hadit]

The anti gunners think they are pretty clever....here is another one. He lists 8 things to stop future mass public shooters....and none of them would stop a mass shooter........but don't let that stop him...

Democrats Have No Idea How To Prevent Mass Shootings

Where are you getting "Democrat"?

Where in fact do you see any citation of a political party at all?

Okay, he's a Republican op-ed writer for the NYT and CNN contributer who champions a social safety net and universal health care. Sometimes something doesn't have to be explicitly stated.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[westwall]

The anti gunners think they are pretty clever....here is another one. He lists 8 things to stop future mass public shooters....and none of them would stop a mass shooter........but don't let that stop him...

Democrats Have No Idea How To Prevent Mass Shootings

Strong gun control has reduced mass shootings. We are only civilized country with this problem. Everywhere else it is rare or requires a terrorist group.

Tell that to the victims of the Norwegian and Paris shootings. Both had more fatalities. You are factually wrong on all counts and both of those countries have gun laws that you would swoon over.

Norway was a one time event. Nothing before or since. We have these regularly. Paris required a terrorist group and had many shooters. Both countries have much lower homicide rates than us. And they don't have police shot and killed weekly.

Wrong again silly boy. We have a population greater than ALL of Europe combined. When you look at Europe they have just as much violence as we do, and it is increasing. Furthermore we have an illegal immigrant population (where the vast majority of violent crime originates) that is more than twice the population of Norway as a whole. Like I sad, you are factually wrong in every respect.

You claimed that draconian gun laws prevent mass shootings. You are wrong. Or you are lying. I'll let you choose which applies to you.

 

[K9Buck]

Ban guns and they'll use trucks. Where there is a will, there is a way. There is no shortage of ways to kill 10, 20 or 50 people without a gun. Just don't ask me to tell you how to do it.

 

[Brain357]

The anti gunners think they are pretty clever....here is another one. He lists 8 things to stop future mass public shooters....and none of them would stop a mass shooter........but don't let that stop him...

Democrats Have No Idea How To Prevent Mass Shootings

Strong gun control has reduced mass shootings. We are only civilized country with this problem. Everywhere else it is rare or requires a terrorist group.

Tell that to the victims of the Norwegian and Paris shootings. Both had more fatalities. You are factually wrong on all counts and both of those countries have gun laws that you would swoon over.

Norway was a one time event. Nothing before or since. We have these regularly. Paris required a terrorist group and had many shooters. Both countries have much lower homicide rates than us. And they don't have police shot and killed weekly.

Wrong again silly boy. We have a population greater than ALL of Europe combined. When you look at Europe they have just as much violence as we do, and it is increasing. Furthermore we have an illegal immigrant population (where the vast majority of violent crime originates) that is more than twice the population of Norway as a whole. Like I sad, you are factually wrong in every respect.

You claimed that draconian gun laws prevent mass shootings. You are wrong. Or you are lying. I'll let you choose which applies to you.

Nothing I said was false. You clearly have no problem lying however. Shall we compare homicide rates with Europe?

 

[Brain357]

Ban guns and they'll use trucks. Where there is a will, there is a way. There is no shortage of ways to kill 10, 20 or 50 people without a gun. Just don't ask me to tell you how to do it.

So you want to make all options available?