And if 40 hours was full-time then they could cut it to 39.5 hours.
The fact remains, the number of workers who are working part-time because their hours were cut back has gone DOWN by 1.12 million since Obamacare was signed into law.

..why do you feel the need to change the subject, especially without a link.
You, as well as Obama, have no credibility to spend.
How exactly is showing the claim that Obamacare is causing employers to cut workers hours is bullshit by showing that the number of workers who had their hours cut since Obamacare was signed into law has gone DOWN by 1.12 million workers changing the subject????? If your bullshit were true the number would have gone up, not DOWN!!!!!
Actually, you're both correct, just using different time frames.
Ed starts in 2010 while Lumpy clearly states this year, 2013.
PolitiFact | The truth(s) behind part-time jobs and the recovery
In one item, we checked a claim made by Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, in a response to one of Obamas Saturday radio addresses.
"In the past, most new jobs were full time, but,
this year, the overwhelming majority of new jobs are part time," Collins said. "Under this troubling trend, more workers will find their hours and their earnings reduced. Jobs will be lost.
PolitiFact | Susan Collins says this year, 'overwhelming majority' of new jobs are part time
The other comment we checked was made by Alan Krueger, the chairman of Obamas Council of Economic Advisers, during an interview with Sara Eisen of Bloomberg television.
Eisen asked Krueger whether were "creating a part-time economy. The news is filled with stories of small businesses and colleges cutting back worker's hours or putting a freeze on hiring."
He responded, "I think that's highly misleading.
Since the Affordable Care Act passed, 90 percent of job growth has been in full-time positions."
PolitiFact | Alan Krueger, top economist to Obama, says most new jobs since health care law passed are full time
Two diametrically opposed statements. Yet both turned out to be correct.
For Collins, we looked at the change in full-time and part-time employment between December 2012 and July 2013, then determined which of the two types of employment accounted for a larger share of the increase in overall employment.
And she was right: 77 percent of the increase in employment over this period came from part-time jobs.
But if you take a longer view, the picture changes.
To check
Kruegers claim, we looked at the same data for the period between March 2010 and July 2013. It turns out that Krueger was right --
87 percent of the increase in employment over this period came from full-time jobs.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
More links in links
