72 Arrested resisting gun confiscation in Maryland!

[iceberg]

Can't get anything past you, eh sherlock?

I, not unlike many, do not have Facebook, dope.

oh my ******* god.

finally a reason to keep to facebook.

Or simply explain WTF the post is meant to be.

nope. it's a facebook thing. you'd not understand.

That's my point, retard.

you're so cute when you're...um...whatever this is.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You gave a link to a Facebook post, dope.

Can't get anything past you, eh sherlock?

I, not unlike many, do not have Facebook, dope.

oh my ******* god.

finally a reason to keep to facebook.

Or simply explain WTF the post is meant to be.

Well, to the thinking person, it becomes self-explanatory in the last three sentences.

No. To a thinking person, it's an unlikely scenario meant to rile the simple.

 

[Moonglow]

This is suppose to be in humor, it has nothing to do with politics..

In fact, it does. It deals with the main topic under discussion in this country right now. Government wanting to reduce or eliminate our Second Amendment rights.

The govt. will not take away your guns if "you" do not let them,,,see how that works....

Yep, the 2A is not required until they try to take it away

-Geaux

They have already taken away the part of the 4th but not a word is said..

 

[Darkwind]

Thread should be in the garbage fake news retarded forum.

Wow. Just ******* wow.

You realize it is satire, right? It is a recounting of the American Revolution using modern language.

Then why didn't you put it in satire? I did check and it wasn't, so I figured it was fake news or you were drunk.

Because it deals with Today's top 'Hot Political Topic'.

The point is political and relevant.

 

[Darkwind]

Can't get anything past you, eh sherlock?

I, not unlike many, do not have Facebook, dope.

oh my ******* god.

finally a reason to keep to facebook.

Or simply explain WTF the post is meant to be.

Well, to the thinking person, it becomes self-explanatory in the last three sentences.

No. To a thinking person, it's an unlikely scenario meant to rile the simple.

Incorrect. But you go ahead and run with that.

 

[Darkwind]

Well, as much fun as this has been, I have to run for a while. Had I known this would trigger so many, I'd have saved it for a time when I wasn't so busy.

 

[OldLady]

Thread should be in the garbage fake news retarded forum.

Wow. Just ******* wow.

You realize it is satire, right? It is a recounting of the American Revolution using modern language.

Then why didn't you put it in satire? I did check and it wasn't, so I figured it was fake news or you were drunk.

maybe it's just a fake drunk.

That is just too much to deal with at 7:45 a.m.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Maryland???

Thread should be in the garbage fake news retarded forum.

You’re dumber than a bag of hammers... ******* shameful what public schools are producing these days... ******* shameful...

it is shameful

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I, not unlike many, do not have Facebook, dope.

oh my ******* god.

finally a reason to keep to facebook.

Or simply explain WTF the post is meant to be.

Well, to the thinking person, it becomes self-explanatory in the last three sentences.

No. To a thinking person, it's an unlikely scenario meant to rile the simple.

Incorrect. But you go ahead and run with that.

I guess it's the sophistication of the thought that keeps it alive only on facebook.

It's nutter porn.

 

[Moonglow]

Well, as much fun as this has been, I have to run for a while. Had I known this would trigger so many, I'd have saved it for a time when I wasn't so busy.

time to masturbate to pictures of guns and dead people....have fun...

 

[iceberg]

Thread should be in the garbage fake news retarded forum.

Wow. Just ******* wow.

You realize it is satire, right? It is a recounting of the American Revolution using modern language.

Then why didn't you put it in satire? I did check and it wasn't, so I figured it was fake news or you were drunk.

maybe it's just a fake drunk.

That is just too much to deal with at 7:45 a.m.

which is why it's fake. if it were real that would be an entirely different issue.

 

[depotoo]

Actually, if you really knew American history, you would know.

Wow.

I gave attribution to the author. If you can't figure out this was nothing more than an embellishment of historical events using modern language, I can't help you.

I suggest you look at post 17.

72 Arrested resisting gun confiscation in Maryland!

You gave a link to a Facebook post, dope.

Can't get anything past you, eh sherlock?

I, not unlike many, do not have Facebook, dope.

How is that My problem?

Because no one has a clue what you're posting, dope.

 

[Auld Phart]

Can't get anything past you, eh sherlock?

I, not unlike many, do not have Facebook, dope.

oh my ******* god.

finally a reason to keep to facebook.

Or simply explain WTF the post is meant to be.

Well, to the thinking person, it becomes self-explanatory in the last three sentences.

No. To a thinking person, it's an unlikely scenario meant to rile the simple.

it's an unlikely scenario meant to rile the simple.

Looking at the posts, I'd say it did do that

 

[depotoo]

For those still confused, a 1995 WP article, recalling the event from 1775,-
WHEN THE REDCOATS CONFISCATED GUNS
Part of the article-

As British troops sailed to Boston in 1768, the Boston Gazette reported that the ministry commanded things "more grievous to the people, than any thing hitherto made known," the first of which was "that the inhabitants of this Province are to be disarmed." By 1774, the British were routinely conducting warrantless searches and seizures of firearms in the Boston area, leading the Gazette to exclaim that "what most irritated the people next to seizing their arms and ammunition" was the arrest of patriot political leaders. King George III ordered the seizure of any firearms imported into the colonies.

Just after the Redcoats' attempt to seize the arms of the rebel militia at Lexington and Concord in 1775, Gen. Thomas Gage ordered all the inhabitants of Boston to turn in their arms at Faneuil Hall for temporary safekeeping. When the people complied, troops seized the firearms, never to return them. A patriot poet described Gen. Gage's order as saying:

 

[iceberg]

Well, as much fun as this has been, I have to run for a while. Had I known this would trigger so many, I'd have saved it for a time when I wasn't so busy.

time to masturbate to pictures of guns and dead people....have fun...

you got strange hobbies dude. but hey - all good in todays world.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Actually, if you really knew American history, you would know.

You gave a link to a Facebook post, dope.

Can't get anything past you, eh sherlock?

I, not unlike many, do not have Facebook, dope.

How is that My problem?

Because no one has a clue what you're posting, dope.

It has nothing to do with history and everything to do with fantasy.

 

[depotoo]

You are so wrong.

Actually, if you really knew American history, you would know.

Can't get anything past you, eh sherlock?

I, not unlike many, do not have Facebook, dope.

How is that My problem?

Because no one has a clue what you're posting, dope.

It has nothing to do with history and everything to do with fantasy.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I, not unlike many, do not have Facebook, dope.

oh my ******* god.

finally a reason to keep to facebook.

Or simply explain WTF the post is meant to be.

Well, to the thinking person, it becomes self-explanatory in the last three sentences.

No. To a thinking person, it's an unlikely scenario meant to rile the simple.

it's an unlikely scenario meant to rile the simple.

Looking at the posts, I'd say it did do that

I'm not riled at the content but rather the poster's inability to make any sort of point.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You are so wrong.

Actually, if you really knew American history, you would know.

I, not unlike many, do not have Facebook, dope.

How is that My problem?

Because no one has a clue what you're posting, dope.

It has nothing to do with history and everything to do with fantasy.

Sure, dope. It's just like the revolution. The founders would all be up in arms over the tyranny of a decision that they empowered the judiciary to make in a system they designed.


It's fantasy.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

For those still confused, a 1995 WP article, recalling the event from 1775,-
WHEN THE REDCOATS CONFISCATED GUNS
Part of the article-

As British troops sailed to Boston in 1768, the Boston Gazette reported that the ministry commanded things "more grievous to the people, than any thing hitherto made known," the first of which was "that the inhabitants of this Province are to be disarmed." By 1774, the British were routinely conducting warrantless searches and seizures of firearms in the Boston area, leading the Gazette to exclaim that "what most irritated the people next to seizing their arms and ammunition" was the arrest of patriot political leaders. King George III ordered the seizure of any firearms imported into the colonies.

Just after the Redcoats' attempt to seize the arms of the rebel militia at Lexington and Concord in 1775, Gen. Thomas Gage ordered all the inhabitants of Boston to turn in their arms at Faneuil Hall for temporary safekeeping. When the people complied, troops seized the firearms, never to return them. A patriot poet described Gen. Gage's order as saying:

Except the governor and the national guard aren't red coats and would be acting within the limits of the law and the constitution.