Agree at least on Wilson, but it doesn't relate to my post, does it.
Sure it does.
The claim that what we view as "liberal" or "progressive" now, is the same as what it was then.
Liberals back then believed the 10th Amendment and 2nd Amendment meant something.
The ones today wipe their asses with it.
Yep, they wrote and approved the 2nd Amendment, which causes the Leftards of today to piss their pants in an epileptic seizure.
Which, again, underscores my point that Liberalism is opposed from both the left and the right.
But you knew that. Just as you knew TJ wasn't a "conservative".
Geezus Christ! Stop with the convoluted semantics already, you're giving me a headache.
Ok, if you're not a liberal and the founding fathers were liberals and conservatives are liberals and liberals are conservatives, then what the hell are you?
There ain't nuttin' "convoluted" about it. Words mean things. And when a word means something, you can't just take the same word and mean its opposite. Lewis Carroll's Humpty Dumpty was lampooning that idea. You've got a definition for Liberalism, now just
leave it alone. It's the Liberal thing to do.
The second half of your post is meaningless word salad and as such, tossed.