$650K Raised for Woman Who Called Child the N-Word

[IM2]

Comparing the two is a false comparison and not appropriate. This is a verbal exchange and social punishment. That involved the death of a human and charges have been filed.

It is a valid comparison to me. Because according to witnesses, Anthony was defending himself, he did not go out and seek someone to kill. Furthermore they did need to raise legal fees. This woman verbally abused a child. That is emotional abuse that will scar this child for some time. It is legally an assault that can be taken to court no different than what happened to Anthony and the fact that a person can call someone a racial slur then create a fundraising account and get $650,000 and counting shows that there are whites in this country who are still very sick. She faces no expenses, so why was this necessary? Why did people feel the need give this much money to someone who assaulted a child like this for no reason? These are the things we should be discussing. Instead it is the usual bushit from the same people, and I'm not talking about you when I say that.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Pro-tip, cussing out a child that is not related to you, is an amazingly bad idea, and tres gauche!

Live by the sword.

Die by the sword.

Not recommended...

Democrats are here telling blacks to live by the sword. They want violence for their own means.

 

[Zincwarrior]

It is a valid comparison to me. Because according to witnesses, Anthony was defending himself, he did not go out and seek someone to kill. Furthermore they did need to raise legal fees. This woman verbally abused a child. That is emotional abuse that will scar this child for some time. It is legally an assault that can be taken to court no different than what happened to Anthony and the fact that a person can call someone a racial slur then create a fundraising account and get $650,000 and counting shows that there are whites in this country who are still very sick. She faces no expenses, so why was this necessary? Why did people feel the need give this much money to someone who assaulted a child like this for no reason? These are the things we should be discussing. Instead it is the usual bushit from the same people, and I'm not talking about you when I say that.

Fair enough. While I agree with the above, I don't view them as comparable.

But yes I agree, depending on what occurred this child was definitely impacted hence my view the PoPo could have procured free bracelets for her.

I also agree with other posters that video is weird as the situation appears weird.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Live by the sword.

Die by the sword.

Not recommended...

Democrats are here telling blacks to live by the sword. They want violence for their own means.

I am not although khopeshes are wicked cool. This is purty!

 

[IM2]

And they would go to jail for doing so.

It is the right of that lady to talk to a thieving kid anyway she wants.



If a white kid was stealing from a black mom, and she called that kid a poor white trash cracker? You would have no problem with that. And neither would I

But the kid wasn't stealing. Why do you white racists always assume things when it involves blacks. This was a 5-year-old kid, if this had been 5-year-old white kid you wouldn't be saying this. It would be a child being curious no harm done. If the black mom had said what you present in your hypothetical, you'd be whining about anti-white racism or woke.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

I am not although khopeshes are wicked cool. This is purty!
View attachment 1107907

Democrats want blacks to act like Marty Mcfly when he's called chicken.

It's bad for Marty and it's bad for blacks.

Blacks should look for peace and not embrace the sword.

Maybe some Back to the Future will help?

 

[Zincwarrior]

But the kid wasn't stealing. Why do you white racists always assume things when it involves blacks. This was a 5-year-old kid, if this had been 5-year-old white kid you wouldn't be saying this. It would be a child being curious no harm done. If the black mom had said what you present in your hypothetical, you'd be whining about anti-white racism or woke.

Correction, five year old child with autism.

 

[IM2]

Fair enough. While I agree with the above, I don't view them as comparable.

But yes I agree, depending on what occurred this child was definitely impacted hence my view the PoPo could have procured free bracelets for her.

I also agree with other posters that video is weird as the situation appears weird.

It's certainly weird, but she could have chastised that child in a number of ways besides the use of that word. However, the real problem here is how many whites have run to contribute money to her only because she called this kid that slur. She does not face any legal fees, so why?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Democrats want blacks to act like Marty Mcfly when he's called chicken.

It's bad for Marty and it's bad for blacks.

Blacks should look for peace and not embrace the sword.

Maybe some Back to the Future will help?

Well now you know I am going there.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

And this? This is the guy that filmed that incident.

View attachment 1107853

UPDATE: Sexual assault case against Rochester men dismissed

The Olmsted County Attorney's Office dismissed charges against Mohamed Hussein Omer and Sharmake Beyle Omar in March of 2025.

www.kaaltv.com

A Somali man previously charged with child rape accosted this Minnesota mom for using the N-word. She's raised over $250,000 and we need to talk about it.

Remember the ancient times before Barack Obama reignited America's skin-color wars?

notthebee.com

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/rule/cr-30/pdf/

I don't like that he was even at that playground to begin with.

As soon as I read the words 'Omar' and 'Minnesota' I quit caring.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Well now you know I am going there.
View attachment 1107910

That looks like a pic of IQ2

 

[IM2]

Correction, five year old child with autism.

And that even makes this worse. Somebody accused this kid of stealing and obviously paid no attention to the autism.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

And that even makes this worse. Somebody accused this kid of stealing and obviously paid no attention to the autism.

Makes it more fake/staged.

 

[playtime]

.




Good.




.

 

[playtime]

Agreed, it shows how the media and social culture have shaped people's priorities.

& donny. don't forget their prez.

Nonetheless, I think both are repulsive and a sad example of where we've headed towards as a society.

donny has given his trogs full tilt permission to be the loudest vile creatures that barely walk upright.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I saw the initial video on the Youtube. Woman has a whole lot of tats.

MS-13 tats, right?

 

[Blaster]

There is nothing wrong with saying the N word. Rap music says it all the time.

 

[Scoutster]

What the woman did was an action dumb ass.

You seem to think that racism is a minor thing. You are downplaying what is legally an assault on a child. That woman scarred that child, psychologically. What she did was child abuse, but to you it was just a word. The bitch was no different than your so called child predator. Whites such as you don't seem to understand psychological impact of racism because your punk asses doesn't face it.

 

[MarcATL]

And you read it all here in their postings. But of course white racism is a thing of the past. Why should these guys be blamed for what their grandparents did, when some of them are the grandparents and they are still doing it?

Yeah, didn't you know that SCOTUS voted that racism is in the past and no longer a factor in American society?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Your argument is that profaning at a child in a public place not your own is legally permissible?

I am going with the local jurisdiction's version of: 1) assault on a child, 2) disturbing the peace; and (by the end of it) 3) resisting arrest. I am sure there are more. Civilly she definitely committed torst against the child. This is not an adult we are talking about but an adult to a five year old.

Of course she didn't commit any tort against the child. It was in phenomenally bad taste but no tort. She didn't assault the child unless she touched him. She hollered at him for touching a diaper bag. She wasn't arrested, nothing happened to her (let's hear it from the free speech experts). Her crowdfunding isn't for any necessary legal fees or settlement awards.

It's for:
Her reasoning for the crowdfunding campaign: She says her identity, social security number, address, phone number, and even the place she exercises have all been leaked, and she needs the money to protect her family from "attacks" or possibly even relocate. "No one has been harmed, and we are getting by," she says in an update on the page. "We are taking the proper procedures in order to stay safe from these constant threats. I'm still very frightened, and I don't think I will feel safe until we can escape completely."

It begs the question, did she call the child a name so she would have an excuse for crowdfunding?