The thing is from our point of view a repressive Islamic government is a bad thing, however for alot of people in the Middle East it is what they want, we have to stop looking at this from an American point of view but from the point of view of a unedcuated Muslim male in the region, I say uneducated because alot of them are in those countries. For them an Islamic regime is like saying to us free lap dances and wings at the strip club.
While I agree that, due to circumstances, people may favor a dictatorship over freedom, those situations are usually very dire ones. After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the turmoil that followed, some Russians openly asked for a return to communist rule simply because it was able to keep order. The same in the Balkans after
Yugoslavia collapsed upon the departure of the Soviets. Some in Iraq wished for a return of Saddam when the succeeding regime couldn't keep the power and water running nor control the mayhem in the streets.
As Fareed Zakaria points out in his book, [ame="http://www.amazon.com/Future-Freedom-Illiberal-Democracy-Abroad/dp/0393047644"]The Future of Freedom[/ame], "some poor countries have become democracies. But when countries become democratic at low levels of development, their democracy usually dies....a democratic country that has a per capita income of under $1500 (in today's dollars), the regime on average had a life expectancy of just eight years. With between $1500 and $3000 it survived on average for about eighteen years. Above $6,000 it became highly resilient."
In order to survive, democracy needs a specific standard of living since people who are starving or barely surviving focus more on survival than personal rights.