5000 Troops on Iraq with no Status of Froces Agreement?

I thought we had to have that?:dunno:

lol, another ISIS defender.

No, that would be our president who is backing aq, isis, and every other terrorist towelhead.

Because he's killed thousands of ISIS fighters, dozens of ISIS leaders, and because he's gotten the Iraqis to defend themselves, to the point they are now winning against ISIS?
I thought we had to have that?:dunno:

lol, another ISIS defender.

Obama is a co-founder of isis. Why don't we need a Status of forces agreement now?:dunno:

Nice mini-meltdown. Keep up with the Koolaid.
 
More American soldiers will die so Iran can take over Iraq


Iran took over Iraq when the GWB administration "appointed" the Shi'a Maliki 10 years ago.....

Nope, they took it over when Obama pulled out for political reasons ...We should have a military base there..a big one, partially paid for by Iraq

You people want to bankrupt us with useless military spending.
 
Nope, they took it over when Obama pulled out for political reasons ...We should have a military base there..a big one, partially paid for by Iraq

Inane response......

Did we have or did we NOT have an agreement signed by Bush and Malaki to withdraw ALL our troops by a certain date???................Yes or No?

Would a breach of that agreement have made us a foreign force occupier of a sovereign state that did not want us there.....Yes or No???

Would our troops in Iraq as uninvited occupiers have been the target of .....not only Iraqis....but all other neighboring countries? Yes or NO???
 
More American soldiers will die so Iran can take over Iraq


Iran took over Iraq when the GWB administration "appointed" the Shi'a Maliki 10 years ago.....

Nope, they took it over when Obama pulled out for political reasons ...We should have a military base there..a big one, partially paid for by Iraq

You people want to bankrupt us with useless military spending.

No, useless entitlements are bankrupting us...

Losers need to get a job... But wait

36 hour a week jobs are all there is....

-Geaux
 
The SOFA is so dems can have this phoney excuse that they "had" to get us out of Iraq.
The dems dovetail every thing the gop does. But redefine it, and the gullible fall for it.



Funny no complaints about these 5000 U.S. soldiers in Iraq from the leftist. Hillary wont even admit they are there

And a Navy Chief was killed yesterday when his vehicle was bombed

-Geaux
 
More American soldiers will die so Iran can take over Iraq


Iran took over Iraq when the GWB administration "appointed" the Shi'a Maliki 10 years ago.....

Nope, they took it over when Obama pulled out for political reasons ...We should have a military base there..a big one, partially paid for by Iraq
Iraq/Iran were at war on & off for decades. When George W Bush took out Sadam, Iran no longer had to spend its resources fighting & defending from Iraq.
 
Democrat's at war? A war that could have been avoided? A war we should never have been involved in? Heaven forbid the fool is required to eat crow. I guess now its ok? He learned a very simple lesson, power vacuums are destined to be filled.
I guess that diplomacy thing didn't work out so well after all did it?
 
I thought we had to have that?:dunno:

lol, another ISIS defender.

No, that would be our president who is backing aq, isis, and every other terrorist towelhead.

Because he's killed thousands of ISIS fighters, dozens of ISIS leaders, and because he's gotten the Iraqis to defend themselves, to the point they are now winning against ISIS?
I thought we had to have that?:dunno:

lol, another ISIS defender.

Obama is a co-founder of isis. Why don't we need a Status of forces agreement now?:dunno:

Nice mini-meltdown. Keep up with the Koolaid.

Nice try but no. You'll also notice how O has upended the ME with his incompetent policies. There is no Yemen, Syria, libya. You can thank O for this. He has created complete chaos.
 
I thought we had to have that?:dunno:
You mean to say you are stupid enough to think we sent troops to Iraq without Iraq's permission? Really?

You tards really do get dumber and dumber every day.
 
I bet they've got one, maybe had one all along. All they had to do is arrest one GI and they'd get SHOCK AND AWE again....it was always a dodge by Barry the Fairy to hightail it out of there.
 
I thought we had to have that?:dunno:

Funny. Iraq "requested" our help - therefore, our troops are not under Iraq legal authority.
They are under legal authority. Iraq provided Diplomatic Letters which are recognized as legal agreements to treat all US Forces under the same diplomatic immunity as is given to Embassy personnel. If an individual is accused of committing a crime the only recourse Iraq would have would be to demand the individual leave the country. They are immune from prosecution.
 
More American soldiers will die so Iran can take over Iraq


Iran took over Iraq when the GWB administration "appointed" the Shi'a Maliki 10 years ago.....

Nope, they took it over when Obama pulled out for political reasons ...We should have a military base there..a big one, partially paid for by Iraq

You people want to bankrupt us with useless military spending.
You people? You people gave us isis. You people want to send 100s of billions to the U.N. and foreign governments for some fake, money laundering, global warming crap. You people sent our jobs to other countries, while our people lose them. You people favor foreigners over our own citizens . You people gave us leftist riots in the streets and demonize our police officers......you people indeed.:slap:
 
15th post
Nope, they took it over when Obama pulled out for political reasons ...We should have a military base there..a big one, partially paid for by Iraq

Inane response......

Did we have or did we NOT have an agreement signed by Bush and Malaki to withdraw ALL our troops by a certain date???................Yes or No?

Would a breach of that agreement have made us a foreign force occupier of a sovereign state that did not want us there.....Yes or No???

Would our troops in Iraq as uninvited occupiers have been the target of .....not only Iraqis....but all other neighboring countries? Yes or NO???


it was an interim agreement, not a final status of forces agreement. We spent trillions in that country. They should pay for part of it and it shouldn't be handed over to Iran, as Iran was sent billions by Obama to accomplish that
 
Last edited:
US Iraq agree on plan to send more American troops - CNNPolitics.com

Yes a new agreement was made.

You people are sofa king stupid that it makes me sick.
US Iraq agree on plan to send more American troops - CNNPolitics.com

Yes a new agreement was made.

You people are sofa king stupid that it makes me sick.

Whats that have to do with prosecution of our troops genius? So he all the sudden was able to get such an agreement?..Post it for me
 
All Americans should watch this incredible documentary. Most will likely begin to question their support for endless war.

 
I thought we had to have that?:dunno:
You mean to say you are stupid enough to think we sent troops to Iraq without Iraq's permission? Really?

You tards really do get dumber and dumber every day.


Permission?..Iran got permission? We didn't need any friken permission we were there already:slap:
 
Back
Top Bottom